语境的释义功能与翻译中词义的确定

语境是语用学的重要理论之一 ,它是理解语言必不可少的因素 ,语境对语言具有释义功能 ,翻译过程中确定词义依赖于语境的释义功能 ,在翻译中确定词义应考虑文本语境中的语言知识、背景知识、情景知识或相互知识等因素     

股东查阅权行使机制的司法政策选择

股东查阅权作为一种工具性、救济性权利,其行使规则蕴含股东和公司之间某种恰当尺度的利益平衡,但立法过于原则化使得这一尺度趋于模糊。意在增强查阅权行使的可操作性、可救济性而制订的司法解释,关于诸环节的具体规范不全然是技术性的,而是包含了若干价值判断和对于当前司法救济现实需求的判断。为此,须在肯定我国现行公司法所确立的价值选择和基本法理框架的范围内作出正确的司法政策选择,并在此基础上明确有关股东查阅权行使与救济的诸具体规范。     

公司治理的文化路径依赖及其创新性选择

公司治理作为一种制度安排,必然要求其自身文化气质上的认同;公司治理模式多样性的事实反映出不同文化价值的路径依赖;公司治理的创新性选择是相关文化的适应与超越;中国语境下公司治理模式的创新性必然要求传统文化的现代性。     

行政审判依据间的冲突及选择的操作分析

行政诉讼中的法律冲突有合法与非法之分.合法冲突是法律允许存在的冲突,只需按照冲突的一般解决规则选择适用法律即可.非法冲突即法律不允许并存的冲突,只能是承认一方有效,另一方无效.非法冲突表现多样,危害法律权威和行政、司法公正,其产生有立法观念、立法体制、立法技术等法律方面原因,为提高诉讼效率,尽量减少法律冲突带来的危害,我国需要确立一些可操作的选择适用规则.     

犯罪定量刑法模式的比较与选择

中外刑法中有"立法定性、司法定量"和"立法既定性又定量"两种犯罪定量模式,两者各有利弊.但传统的法文化与现实法体系的冲突注定了在我国刑法典中对犯罪进行"立法定量"的合理性和现实性.只有将"立法定量"与"司法定量"协调统一起来,犯罪定量才会得以实现.     

The empirical application of the spatial theory of voting in multiparty systems with random utility models

Spatial models of voting predominate in the formalization of political decisions and continue to be a growth industry in political science. But strict empirical applications of this theory have been rare. Only recently, conditional discrete choice models have been proposed to fill the gap between formal and empirical models and to predict the individual voting decision in multi-candidate/multiparty contests on the basis of the spatial model. This article highlights several flexible features of these models that are well known in transportation economics and applied marketing science but not yet discussed in the electoral studies community. Empirical illustrations are provided on the basis of (nested) multinomial logit.     

Paradoxes of Gender in Elderly Care: The Case of Men as Care Workers in Sweden

The Swedish public system of elderly care is highly relevant for studying gender relations, specifically when male care workers are more frequently seen within this female-coded field of practice. In this article, qualitative interviews with male and female care workers, elderly women and men, and care managers are analysed to discover how they talk about care work and how gender is expressed, both implicitly and explicitly, in the materialization of care. By illuminating the dynamics of how gender is constructed and negotiated in the intersection of the different actors' perspectives, the paradoxes of gender appeared. The care workers' moral responsibility seemed to undermine equality between male and female care workers, and the elderly clients' gendered expectations and representations created inequality in care work. Furthermore, the gender-neutral assessments made by the care managers came to favour elderly men. Thus, the results suggest the importance of capturing the different perspectives in society's institutions, such as elderly care, in order to understand the complexities of gendered processes.     

Correctly Understanding “School Choice”

Despite ample debates over the efficacy of school choice, theorizing has lagged behind and this hinders progress. Milton Friedman, the choice movement founder, never claimed that choice would improve academics; choice was inherently valuable and parents might demand anything. Choice advocates also exaggerate the remedial power of markets and proliferating academic options seldom brings academic diligence. Given free tutoring opportunities, those lagging behind reject them, and costs will usually be too high for most low achievers. Extensive schooling options already exist, so waging political battles to add more is unnecessary. Moreover, today’s supposed “school choice” is not genuine consumer choice no matter how educationally worthwhile; it is imposed from above san consumer input. Even when choice schools shine, it is unclear why. If free to chose, consumes may prefer non-academics. Finally, if choice qua choice is the standard, focusing on academic achievement is misdirected.

把握着力点探索统筹城乡发展新模式

统筹城乡发展是党中央解决城乡二元结构的总体思路和战略选择,也是解决“三农”问题的最终出路。目前我国城乡二元结构造成的深层次矛盾和问题依然突出,城乡发展的差距还在扩大,怎样解决这些问题,仍值得我们去思考和探索。     

Childcare Policies and the Politics of Choice

Governments have intervened in two basic ways on childcare: via the provision of leaves to care (usually taken by mothers) and the provision or (often only partial) financing of childcare services. These policy options reflect the fundamental debate on how young children should be cared for. Labour has developed both policy areas since 1997, but there is a question mark over how far mothers and fathers have a ‘real choice’ to work and/or to care. Parents' choice in this policy area is a sensitive political issue and, this article suggests, requires a careful balancing of policy instruments. Policy goals may conflict with preferences and there is also the difficult issue that parents' choices may prejudice their future welfare in a work/welfare system that is tending to assume that there will be increasing capacity for self‐provisioning.