关于解决我国内地与香港、澳门区际合同法律冲突问题的思考

1997年香港回归和1999年澳门回归后三地的经济往来愈加频繁,由此引起的我国内地与香港、澳门区际合同法律冲突问题也越来越频繁地出现在我们面前,解决这一问题业已成为我国立法的重要任务。当事人意思自治和最密切联系是合同冲突法的重要原则,是解决合同法律冲突问题的重要手段,我国在解决区际合同法律冲突问题时也应当充分利用这两项原则。     

公民社会与有限责任政府的构建

改革开放以来,公民社会强调多元性和多样性,尊重社会自治,这就要求政府和社会的界限应该进一步明晰,政府的职能、权力和规模应该受到宪法和法律的明确限制,政府在高效地承担有限责任的同时应充分尊重公民在社会领域内的自治权。     

非营利组织营利活动及其收入的税法规制——制度比较分析的视角

本文通过中外理论及法律法规比较,揭示了非营利组织的基本特征,即非营利组织是具有组织性、非利润分配性、民间性、自治性和志愿性的组织。同时,为了扩大收入来源,保证非营利组织的可持续发展,国家应在附加有关限制条件的基础上,允许非营利组织开展营利活动。与此同时,需采用不同标准划分非营利组织营利收入的来源和用途,针对不同类型的收入设计不同的税收优惠政策,从而达到鼓励社会力量兴办公益事业、促进市场公平竞争的目的。     

大学生创业面临的问题探析

大力支持大学生自主创业、自谋职业,不断发展新的职业,拓宽各种就业渠道,不仅可以使大学生自己成为能够自食其力之人,还可以在创业的过程中创造更多的就业岗位,解决更多人的就业问题。文章分析了大学生创业面临的问题与障碍,从转变就业观念、优化创业环境、发挥政府导向作用、开展创业教育与实践等方面着手,提出促进大学生创业的对策建议。     

竞技体育暴力行为之刑法介入

目前，竞技体育领域强调行业自治，排斥刑法介入，致使体育暴力行为日益猖獗。刑法应当介入竞技体育暴力行为，这符合刑法谦抑性的要求、社会公众的要求以及国外司法实践的作法。刑法介入竞技体育暴力行为，应当以严重脱逸社会相当性理论为依据，遵循有限介入的原则，严格确定刑法介入的范围和程度，疏通刑法介入的渠道，并依照一定的程序予以介入。     

在实践中解放思想 用赶超争创一流

争创＂一流＂党校,成为当前党校系统的热点话题。然而,什么是＂一流＂党校？习近平校长提出教学和科研、人才和队伍、硬件和基础设施、管理和服务、风气和人文环境五个方面争创一流的目标和定位,不仅是中共中央党校当前和今后一个时期的努力方向,也是市县级党校未来发展的依据和参考标尺,是做好市县级党校工作的总抓手。     

论公司自治的法律边界

公司自治的法律边界是规范公司治理行为的重要内容。公司自治的法律边界可以从其实体法、公司章程和法律救济等三个方面进行划定。实体法介入的主要改革思路是减少实体性规定，增加程序性强制规范的适用范围。公司章程约束的主要完善对策除了要增加章程的类型，提高章程的灵活性外，更重要的是要合理分配股东会与董事会的职权范围，固化股东权利。法律救济的完善则应着眼于商事审判理念的确立、经营判断规则的引入和专任商事陪审员制度的建立等几个方面。     

Corporate power in Australian policy making: The case of unfair contract laws

There is increasing concern about the impact of corporate power on Australian policy making. This article examines the dynamics of corporate influence by examining the battle between big business and small business over “unfair contract” laws. It explores whether big business exerted disproportionate power, and if it did whether it was structural, ideational, or instrumental power. It finds that while recent scholarship has been focused on structural and ideational sources of power, there is strong evidence of a narrowly conceived instrumental power exerting considerable influence within both of the major parties. Further, it concludes this form of instrumental power presents the most serious threat to democratic policy making.     

Politics and the Political in Castoriadis

This paper explores the distinction of politics and the political in Castoriadis’ work. Whereas the political refers to the instituted as the management of society in accordance with established laws, politics refers to the instituting as the capacity of the imaginary to constantly challenge established laws on the basis of individual and collective autonomy. The politics of autonomy identify with the regime of direct democracy, established first and foremost at the level of economy and expanding accordingly in all spheres of society. Democracy contains both a psychoanalytical and educational perspective inasmuch as it aims at the conscious self-reflective harmonisation of individual and collective autonomy by means of collective deliberation.     

Private regulatory capture via harmonization: An analysis of global retailer regulatory intermediaries

Studies using the Regulatory–Intermediary–Target (RIT) framework have examined a variety of forms of regulatory capture, including how targets capture intermediaries (T?I) and how intermediaries capture regulators (I?R). Little attention has been paid to why and how regulators themselves might engage in capture. Yet such a scenario is likely in transnational governance settings characterized by regulatory competition and conflict, as well as power differentials between different types of private regulators (non‐governmental organizations, multinational corporations, and business associations). This paper elucidates why and how a private regulator might capture another private regulator via a regulatory intermediary: R1?I?R2. Drawing on interview and archival data, I examine three industry‐driven regulatory intermediaries created to harmonize private labor codes of conduct and ethical audit processes. These are founded and governed by a small group of retail trade associations and global retailers who also fulfill the role of private regulators (R1). My analysis reveals that the creation of these intermediaries is driven by global retailers’ reliance on standardization, low transaction costs, and regulatory harmonization across all aspects of their operations. It further reveals how the harmonization platforms are designed to leverage global retailers’ market power and evolve from regulatory intermediaries into de facto regulators that supplant existing private regulators (R2), and thereby capture transnational governance of consumer product supply chains. The article concludes by discussing contributions, implications, and avenues for future research.