刑事错案危害的经济学分析

刑事错案的危害可以用经济指标来衡量.具体体现在四个方面:一是刑事错案降低诉讼效率、浪费司法资源;二是错案赔偿给国家带来经济负担;三是放纵真凶会产生新的社会安全隐患;四是错案追究对办案人员及受害人本身带来直接或者间接的经济损失.狠抓刑事诉讼过程的"质量监管",错案的生成率必然会降低.     

实质合并原则在我国关联企业破产中的适用

实质合并原则是基于衡平而创造的一种公平分配破产财产的救济措施。关联企业蓬勃发展的今天,《公司法》和《企业破产法》并没有关于关联企业破产的相关规定,这为我国司法实践增加了难度。我国可采用"例外适用"的价值选择和在《公司法》中设立专章与在《破产法》中规定相关原则的方式来规范实质合并原则在我国关联企业破产中的适用。     

行政诉讼中“诉的利益”

诉的利益是诉讼法学中一个非常重要的概念,是指当事人在其利益受到不利影响时,寻求司法救济的必要性。诉的利益理论不仅应在防止原告滥用诉权、避免被告无端应诉和避免司法资源浪费方面发挥消极作用;更应当在权利生成方面发挥其积极作用。诉的利益的认定标准问题实际上是一个利益衡量问题。诉的利益的范围直接影响法院的主管范围、原告资格以及诉讼类型等诸多问题。     

Investigating the uses of mobile phone evidence in China criminal proceedings

Data from mobile phones are regularly used in the investigation of crime and court proceedings. Previously published research has primarily addressed technical issues or provided operational manuals for using forensic science evidence, rather than analysing human factors and the implementation of forensic tools in investigation settings. Moreover, previous research has focused almost entirely on western countries, and there is a dearth of research into the uses of forensic evidence in China. In this study, a review was carried out of court sentencing documents referring to mobile phone evidence in China over the period 2013–2018. Automated content analysis was used to identify the specific evidence types utilised and the sentencing outcome for each case. Results show that mobile phone evidence was used in 3.3% of criminal proceedings. Among various data types mentioned in criminal proceedings, call records sustained as the most frequently used type of data. After which, instant messaging tools (e.g. WeChat) are an increasing proportion of all mobile phone evidence, from 1% in 2015 to 25% in 2018. For cases that utilised mobile phone data, the analysis of instant messaging and online transaction tools is routine, with little variation in the use of each application (WeChat, Alipay, QQ) for investigations of different types of crime. However, in the majority of criminal cases, mobile phone data function as subsidiary evidence and posed limited impacts on verdict reached. The current findings indicate that a large amount of mobile phone evidence was transformed into other evidence formats or filtered out directly before court proceedings.     

案外第三人权益程序保障体系研究

我国民事诉讼法为案外第三人维护自身合法权益设置了执行异议、执行异议之诉、撤销之诉和申请再审四种救济途径。由于四种途径在适用范围上存在模糊和矛盾,因此引发了权益保护方式或路径的选择困境。为了避免选择困境,实现救济资源的有效利用,应当对上述方法予以优化配置。执行异议应定位为程序性审查,终局性中止或撤销相关执行行为有赖于执行异议之诉和第三人撤销之诉。基于再审制度的兜底性质,撤销之诉应当被优先适用。如果案外第三人在执行过程中可以通过相关程序主张权利,原则上在执行结束后排除撤销之诉和审判监督程序适用。从立法论视角出发,撤销之诉在我国的确立是针对虚假诉讼的应激举措,只有在民事诉讼立法和实践中确立既判力制度,才能根本保障案外第三人合法权益。     

银行破产法理论的现实意义解读

金融全球化的当今社会,无论是经济学家还是法学家,都满怀热情地把目光投向银行破产问题的研究。在现实背景之下诞生的银行破产法理论必将在对银行危机及银行破产制度安排的理解、当今破产运动的发展认识、加强银行破产立法工作以及澄清理论的模糊四个方面产生深远的影响。     

构建我国个人破产制度的法律思考

个人破产制度在保护债权人利益、维护市场经济秩序等方面起到非常积极的作用。它是维护交易安全,贯彻法的公平价值的保障。在我国建立个人破产制度是经济发展和法制建设的必然要求。     

试论我国破产法律制度之完善

破产是市场竞争优胜劣汰的产物。通过破产使劣质资产获得重组,再显生机。我国破产制度还存在缺陷,我们必须完善破产法律制度,规范企业破产行为,才能最大限度地保护债权人和债务人的合法权益。同时也使破产企业职工获得救济的途径。从而保障社会稳定和市场经济运行健康地发展。