管理视角下的公安民警休息权保障对策研究

在当前社会形势下,公安工作日益趋于繁重,社会环境更加复杂,违法犯罪问题日益严重,这使公安工作面临着更大的挑战和压力。为了维护社会稳定,他们普遍长时间、高强度地工作,对身心健康造成了严重损害。本文在对警察休息权的现状、休息权的重要意义,民警休息权无法得到保障的原因等问题进行分析的基础上,用管理学的视角提出有效保障警察休息权的对策建议,希望有助于公安民警休息权的保障,也有利于提高公安工作效率。     

The October 2011 Kenyan invasion of Somalia: fighting al-Shabaab or defending institutional interests?

This paper asks why Kenya invaded Somalia in October 2011. It scrutinises five possible explanations as to why Kenyan decision-makers decided to invade neighbouring Somalia. The explanations are inspired by different theoretical frameworks. Some are inspired by theories developed to analyse Western societies, whereas others are inspired by theoretical reflections aimed at understanding politics in Africa. It is concluded that the decision to invade Somalia was made because of the institutional and ‘bureaucratic’ interests of the Kenyan Defense Forces (KDF) advanced by a limited number of men of Somali-Kenyan origin who pursued their own interests. Security and economic concerns did play a role, while the paper dismisses that the invasion can be understood as a consequence of the Kenyan government pursuing an ‘international image management strategy’. Theoretically, the paper concludes that ‘Western’ theories may contribute to explaining the launch of ‘Linda Nchi,’ whereas Africa-focused theories like neo-patrimonialism seem less helpful in this particular context.     

Conclusion: Mental health and legal responses to the adolescent mental health crisis: Raising the bar on best interests and promoting family connectedness in divorcing families

We are currently facing an unprecedented increase in adolescent mental health problems resulting in alarmingly high levels of depression, anxiety, and suicidality. Significant mental health problems among youth pose unique challenges to families in the process of separation and divorce, as well as to family law professionals across all disciplines. The current adolescent mental health crisis calls for new ways of approaching our work with high conflict families to promote family connectedness and shift away from adversarial approaches that may exacerbate conflict and further destabilize families. As a conclusion to the special issue on adolescent mental health needs, the authors make multidisciplinary best practices recommendations and advocate for systems level changes in recognition of the needs of youth in crisis at this pivotal developmental stage.     

The development and pilot testing of a family treatment court best practices assessment: The model standards implementation scale

In 2019, the family treatment court (FTC) best practice standards (the Standards) were published to clarify attributes of FTC programs associated with superior child, parent, and family outcomes. The Standards cover the breadth of FTC operations including program structure and leadership, substance use treatment and complementary services, and behavioral responses to participants. This study aimed to develop an instrument (the Model Standards Implementation Scale; “MSIS”) that stakeholders can use to assess implementation of the Standards by individual FTCs. The MSIS balances usability with scientific validity. Interrater reliability (IRR), internal consistency, and several types of validity were assessed. Results indicated moderate to strong IRR, high internal consistency, mixed known groups validity depending on Standard, and high convergent and divergent validity. Initial findings suggest good validity and usability of the MSIS for evaluating FTC Standards' implementation. Notably, the process of using the tool functioned to educate FTC team members on the Standards. Although implementation of the MSIS is a resource-intensive process, the opportunity to receive constructive feedback proved to be an effective incentive for initial and subsequent participation in the evaluation among FTCs. Future research is needed to examine predictive validity, including association between Standards' implementation and family outcomes in FTCs.     

家事诉讼与儿童利益保护

儿童利益是一种身份利益,具有显著的公益性,国家与社会必须给予特殊保护。涉及儿童的家事审判要遵循儿童利益最大化、儿童参与以及儿童优先保护等原则。从我国家事审判立法看,涉及儿童利益保护的规定散见于诸多的法律、司法解释以及政策性文件中,这些规定尽管为家事司法提供了基本的依据,但缺憾亦非常明显,表现为没有上位法的原则性规定,没有形成体系完整、结构合理的专门制度,部分立法规范前后矛盾,缺乏科学性和严谨性,缺乏实现儿童利益最大化的具体程序和相关配套机制。为此,有必要在基本法和部门法层面确立儿童利益最大化的法律原则;保障儿童表达意见权利和诉讼参与权;从司法层面看,确认儿童的诉讼主体地位,确立涉儿童家事案件职权探知、职权调查原则,建立专业化的家事审判机构。通过上述多重举措,真正实现家事审判对儿童利益的充分保障。     

完善我国的涉农信访制度——以农民利益保护为视角

在保护农民利益、维护农村社会治安的视角下,从对产生农民“信访潮”的原因分析出发。理性分析信访制度在农民利益保护方面的优势和弊端,进而作出法治化选择,对于构建信访保护农民权益的多元机制,强化现有信访制度的优点并及时完善存在的缺陷,有着积极的意义。     

论经济法的价值

探讨经济法的价值本质,可以遵从这样一种逻辑：价值——利益——法的价值及价值本质——经济法的价值及价值本质。     

综合利用社会资源 建立利益导向机制

思南县通过加强部门协作,健全各项制度,转变工作思路和方法,充分利用社会资源,不断完善政策体系,建立计划生育利益导向机制,塑造了"和谐计生"新形象,为构建"和谐思南"营造了良好的人口环境。     

对等性权利义务下的农业补贴法律制度研究

农业、农村经济的发展以及农民收入的增长是关系到国家和社会利益的一项重要事情,在当前的社会经济发展前提下,根据权利义务的对等性理念,分析农业的特性,得出农业具有先义务性,存在权利与义务非对等性的现象,以此揭示农业补贴得以存在的本质内涵,即弥补这种先义务性,寻求权利义务的数量等值,最后得出须通过建立完善的农业补贴法律制度,达到权利与义务的对等,保证正当权利的实现,使其获得正当利益,最终使社会正义得以体现。