生物样品中敌鼠钠盐和溴敌隆杀鼠药的检验

介绍了敌鼠和溴敌隆抗凝血杀鼠药的定性定量分析方法.在酸性条件下,选用液-液提取和C_(18)柱固相萃取方法处理生物样品,用高效液相色谱法和薄层色谱方法定性定量分析.方法适用于中毒案件的检验.     

低拷贝DNA模板检验方法探讨

目的探讨扩增及检测方法对低拷贝DNA模板分型检测灵敏度的影响。方法Control DNA 9947A按比例稀释,采用IdentifilerTM和DNATyper15TM试剂扩增,循环参数设置为28和28+6个循环,平行扩增3次,分别单独检测及3次合并检测,使用310及3130分析仪检测。结果28+6个循环的基因座检出率高于28个循环;等位基因不平衡及丢失与基因座没有特异性的关联,随着DNA模板量的减少,等位基因不平衡及丢失增多;将3次扩增产物混合后检测,等位基因不平衡及丢失情况减少,分型正确率增高。结论模板DNA分3次扩增后混合检测、循环数为28+6,可提高低拷贝模板基因座的检出率。     

Y—STR基因座分型缺失分析

目的分析Y—STR基因座等位基因分型缺失数据,为法医学提供应用参考。方法收集浙江汉族4477名无关男性个体血样,自动工作站磁珠法提取DNA,Y—filer^TM试剂盒进行复合扩增,Gene Mapper IDv3．2分析软件分析Y-STR数据,统计出现基因分型缺失的概率。结果在4477名无关个体的Y—STR数据中,有来自23种单倍型的26个样本Y-STR分型各有1个短片段基因座的基因分型缺失,而其它长片段基因座的分型均完全正常。基因分型缺失的发生频率为0．518％。结论Y-STR基因座分型缺失具有一定的发生率,在日常检案中应注意防止误判。     

A GOOD EXAMPLE OF PARENT ADVOCACY FOR RIGHTS IN INCLUSIVE EDUCATION IN CHINA

While children with disabilities experience exclusion and segregation in education, parents’ involvement has been very limited due to the lack of parent support in China. Negative attitudes toward disability in an environment deeply influenced by the individual model of disability thinking makes it crucial for parents to advocate for their children’s rights in inclusive education through collaborative and organized efforts. This article examines barriers obstructing disabled children’s rights in pursuing inclusive education, barriers parents face to advocate for their children, and the development of parent support. The author argues that equal and inclusive education for all has a broader social impact beyond disability rights to eliminate barriers and pursue dignity for all. In doing so, the author reveals existing structural inequalities facing inclusive education, encourages the momentum for future changes, and utilizes a good example of parent advocacy for a deeper and meaningful policy advancement to overcome discrimination on the basis of disability that causes segregation and exclusion in education. Recommendations include strategies for the construction of a support network for parents to play their important roles in advancing the rights of their disabled children in inclusive education.     

Accuracy Rates of Ancestry Estimation by Forensic Anthropologists Using Identified Forensic Cases

A common task in forensic anthropology involves the estimation of the ancestry of a decedent by comparing their skeletal morphology and measurements to skeletons of individuals from known geographic groups. However, the accuracy rates of ancestry estimation methods in actual forensic casework have rarely been studied. This article uses 99 forensic cases with identified skeletal remains to develop accuracy rates for ancestry estimations conducted by forensic anthropologists. The overall rate of correct ancestry estimation from these cases is 90.9%, which is comparable to most research‐derived rates and those reported by individual practitioners. Statistical tests showed no significant difference in accuracy rates depending on examiner education level or on the estimated or identified ancestry. More recent cases showed a significantly higher accuracy rate. The incorporation of metric analyses into the ancestry estimate in these cases led to a higher accuracy rate.     

The Optimized Summed Scored Attributes Method for the Classification of U.S. Blacks and Whites: A Validation Study

Recently, Hefner and Ousley (2014) introduced the optimized summed scored attributes (OSSA) method that maximizes between‐group differences in U.S. black and white populations by dichotomizing six cranial morphoscopic trait scores. This study tests OSSA using an independent skeletal sample (Hamann‐Todd, n = 208) and positively identified forensic cases (Mercyhurst University, n = 28, and New York City Office of Chief Medical Examiner, n = 38). An evaluation of trait frequencies suggests shifting the heuristically selected sectioning point separating U.S. black and white populations from ≤ 3 to ≤ 4. We found a total correct classification of 73.0% (B = 50.9%, W = 89.2%) using the originally suggested sectioning point of ≤3, while the total correct classification increases to 79.2% (B = 80.2%, W = 78.5%) with a modified sectioning point of ≤4. With the increased total correct classification and reduced classification bias between ancestry groups, we suggest the modified sectioning point of ≤4 be used when assessing ancestry in forensic unknowns.     

mRNA荧光复合扩增系统鉴别正常和异常精液初探

目的构建mRNA荧光复合扩增体系,实现对不同种类精液(尤其是无精症精液)的区分鉴别。方法收集正常、少精症及无精症的精液样本,制备精斑样本后提取细胞总RNA,利用逆转录PCR技术扩增2个精子特异mRNA标记(PRM1、PRM2)、2个精浆特异mRNA标记(TGM4、SEMG1)和2个管家基因mRNA标记(TEF、UCE)。结果正常精液样本可检测到全部精液mRNA标记表达;少精症精液样本虽然可检测到全部mRNA标记表达,但精子特异mRNA标记表达量较低;无精症精液样本不能检测到精子mRNA标记,只能检测到精浆特异mRNA标记。结论利用mRNA荧光复合扩增系统可以实现对正常和无精症精液的区分,而正常精液和少精症精液相比差异无统计学意义。     

布料上掌纹的真空镀膜显现及DNA检验的研究

目的探究布料载体上潜掌纹经真空镀膜显现后,掌纹DNA提取相关影响因素与检出基因座数目的关系。方法分别进行出汗手与无汗手掌纹按压,放置不同时间;对提取的掌纹DNA进行定量检测;比较白色与黑色布料载体基因座数目检出情况。结果掌纹基因座数目检出随时间延长而递减,出汗手组基因座数目检出高于无汗手组,rfu值600时,基因座数目检出百分比90%,模板量阈值为0.013ng。同一提取方法白布基因座数目检出高于黑布,布料色素抑制PCR扩增,致使基因座检出数目减少。结论真空镀膜技术能够很好地应于掌纹DNA的检测。     

快速PCR仪与普通PCR仪扩增效果的比较研究

目的比较快速PCR仪与普通PCR仪的扩增效果。方法浓度为0.1、0.05、0.025、0.0125、0.0063ng/μL的9947A标准品各取样100例,采用Identifiler Plus试剂盒构建扩增体系,其中50例在普通PCR仪(9700型扩增仪)上进行扩增,50例在快速PCR仪(Speed cycler2扩增仪)上扩增,3500x L型遗传分析仪检测,对比每种浓度组两种扩增仪的检验结果。结果两种PCR仪的检出率均无差异(P0.05)。但当9947A的浓度为0.0125、0.0063ng/μL时,普通PCR仪检验样本的STR基因座检出数(13.7±1.0;11.3±1.5)均高于快速PCR仪(13.1±1.3;9.9±1.9),差异有统计学意义(P=0.029;P0.001);当9947A的浓度为0.1、0.05、0.025 ng/μL时,普通PCR仪检验样本的图谱峰高(18931±4625;13437±3165;5752±1344)均高于快速PCR仪(16929±4034;11815±4120;4865±1401),差异有统计学意义(P=0.023;P=0.030;P=0.002)。结论快速PCR仪可在较短的时间内达到与普通PCR仪相当的检出率,适合于实际案件中的应用;普通PCR仪检验获得的STR分型结果质量可能更高。     

生物检材中乌头碱的LC-MS/MS快速分析

目的应用高效液相色谱-质谱法对生物检材中乌头生物碱等有毒成分进行快速分析。方法取全血样品经乙腈-甲醇(5:1 v/v)提取,使用Agilent Zorbax SB C18(2.1 mm×50 mm,1.8μm)色谱柱,以0.1%甲酸溶液-乙腈(60:40 v/v)为流动相等度洗脱。在多反应监测模式下测定全血样品中乌头生物碱等有毒成分。结果乌头碱、次乌头碱和中乌头碱的保留时间为0.73 min、0.77 min和0.63 min;用于定量分析的离子对分别为m/z 646.4→586.4(乌头碱)、616.1→556.5(次乌头碱)和632.4→572.1(中乌头碱)。乌头碱在0.1~250 ng/m L内线性关系良好,相关系数(r)≥0.9987,最低检出限0.1ng/m L,精密度考查其变异系数(CV)5.42%(n=6),血液中乌头碱提取回收率不小于90%。结论本文建立的高效液相色谱-质谱法快速、简便、灵敏,适用于天然药毒物检验。