承租人优先购买权的法律救济方式——评《合同法》230条的矛盾性

《中华人民共和国合同法》第230条所规定的承租人优先购买权并未明确救济方式，从逻辑上分析，存在3种救济方式。这3种救济方式有存在的理论根据、优点及不足，并且其也代表了承租人优先购买权的3种性质。房屋承租人优先购买权无论如何定性。在理论上及实务上均存在矛盾。     

四川省家禽及鸟类减蛋综合征血清流行病学调查

采集四川省农村散养的鸡、鸭、鹅、鹌鹑、鸽和野外麻雀的血液，分离血清，应用微量血凝抑制（ＨＩ）试验检测减蛋综合征（ＥＤＳ－７６）病毒感染情况。阳性率为：鸡３．０１％（１３／４３２），鸭４４．８６％（４３６／９７２），鹅２８．８１％（１１９／４１３），鹌鹑３．５７％（２７／７５６），鸽１８．７５％（１８／９６），麻雀３０．５６％（１１／３６）；另外在１９８５年疫病普查时采集并保存的鸭、鹅血清中也查到了ＤＥＳ－７６抗体，阳性率分别为鸭４３．３０％（４２／９７），鹅２６．４０％（２９／１１０）。     

域外文化的移植——沉默权之中国化

法律移植过程中需要避免片面化和理想化的因素,沉默权实质上是证据规则的告知问题。基于中西方文化的差异,我国不宜确立明示的沉默权制度,应建立适宜我国国情的“沉默”制度。     

虚拟价值链的理论与应用

本文详述了虚拟价值链的思想 ,并尝试构建出虚拟价值链的一般理论模型 ,从而解决了企业在信息时代的竞争中缺少战略指导的缺陷。通过论述虚拟价值链和传统价值链的关系 ,本文指出了虚拟价值链模型的适用范围 ,并提出了企业应用这一模型进行竞争的基本原则和方法。     

动物源性金黄色葡萄球菌耐药性的检测

用K B法对52株动物源性金黄色葡萄球菌进行了 17 种抗生素耐药性检测。结果,试验菌对16种抗生素的耐药率达 19.2%~84.6%,耐药率最高的为氨苄青霉素,最低的为头孢曲松;其中对12种抗生素的耐药率在50.0%以上;在52株金黄色葡萄球菌中最少的耐 2 种抗生素,最多的耐15种抗生素,表明临床分离的金黄色葡萄球菌株均表现高水平耐药和多重耐药;受试菌均对万古霉素敏感。     

论循环经济的目标及其规范

循环经济的目标是生态效应,提高生态经济效率和实行3R原则还难以达到这个目标,需要转换思路,创新设计.循环经济立法以生态效应为导向,构建其法域、部门法和法律关系.     

对于"违宪审查"的概念分析

违宪审查热是当前宪法学研究的一个误区.抛弃倾尽全力论证和推动违宪审查制度建立的理想主义,首先应该探讨的是违宪审查的基本概念.应该严格界定违宪的概念,尤其是要与违法区分开来,继而分析究竟什么是违宪审查,在此基础上讨论我国违宪审查的现状.     

“见危不救”犯罪化的层次分析

社会对见危不救行为是否定的.对其价值判断的这种一致性,使得对其犯罪化不只是可能,而且是必要的.对见危不救行为动用刑罚加以调整,使人们自愿承担救人于危难间的义务,以促进社会的整体利益.我国刑法中应增加"见危不救罪",但要有严格的范围限制.     

论非法经营同类营业罪

本文对非法经营同类营业罪规定的国有公司、企业及其中董事、经理的范围和同类营业的内涵等问题进行探讨,以明确本罪犯罪构成。     

Economics and Law of Works of Art in the Single European Market

This paper is concerned with the economic analysis of the European rules on the circulation of works of art. After reviewing the relevant literature, an economic framework of the international circulation of works of art is provided (social goals, efficiency and distributive aspects, an economic rationale for a general free trade rule integrated by selective protectionism). Using this framework the European system of circulation of works of art—resulting from the combination of the Maastricht Treaty with Regulation 3911/92 and Directive 93/7—is analysed. The main results of the analysis are: 1) the general free trade principle ruling the Single European Market is strongly limited by rules protecting national artistic heritages of member states; 2) this protectionism—working towards countries both outside and inside the European Union—is applied according to the national laws of each member state, while, contrary to what the Maastricht Treaty would call for, an artistic heritage of European significance is not defined and no autonomous role is recognized in this field to European Institutions; 3) this system shows some inconsistencies with economic theory, as strict limits to trade are not provided when they should be required by the preservation of the physical or artistic integrity of works of art, while in other cases an unduly restrained trade may derive from highly protectionist national laws and export-licencing policies of member states. Enforcement provisions are also analysed and some proposals to improve the system are advanced.