对欧洲资本主义起源问题的研究

资本主义起源的问题,即如何解释欧洲从封建社会向资本主义过渡,是什么力量推动它转变,一直是学术界关注和争论的中心问题。国外学者对此问题的探讨聚讼纷纭。根据研究方法、研究角度的不同,可以分为商业说、人口说、阶级说、文化说、世界体系说、环境说。通过对这些学说的了解,我们可以全面地把握和更好地认清中世纪欧洲的历史。     

正确认识"垂死的"资本主义--二十一世纪重读帝国主义论

历史规律是不可逆转的.当代资本主义的新发展,虽然使得资本主义"垂而不死",但没有改变列宁同志所揭示的帝国主义是腐朽的垂死的资本主义这一论断的正确性.而社会主义在经受磨难之后,定能实现悲壮的扬弃,并通过大力发展生产力,实现"共富村".     

全球化进程中的资本主义与社会主义

全球化是一个不断演进的历史过程。全球化的历史、现实和趋向都揭示了社会主义与资本主义的内在逻辑联系。偏离世界历史总规律和经济全球化总趋向，是苏联社会主义模式失败的重要原因。全球化历程表明，资本主义是全球化的起点，社会主义是全球化的结局。社会主义主导的全球化实现之日是共产主义全球化到来之时，真正意义上的全球化只有在共产主义条件下才能实现。     

适应社会需求的大学生综合素质测评体系的构建

大学生综合素质测评是高校对大学生的质量进行的全面评价和总结,也是社会用人单位了解毕业生的第一手资料。我们要运用文献法、调查法、统计学方法等相关的教育理论,剖析社会对大学生评价与大学生综合素质测评产生差距的原因,在大学生综合素质测评中,坚持全面性与导向性原则,社会化和个性化原则,层次性原则和可操作性原则。     

20世纪50年代毛泽东对私人资本主义认识的演变逻辑

20世纪50年代可以说是毛泽东一生对私人资本主义认识的一个缩影。"利用、限制";"利用、限制、改造";使"资本主义绝种";"可以消灭了资本主义,又搞资本主义"和破"资产阶级法权",把"资本主义残余都可以逐步搞掉",是毛泽东这一时期对私人资本主义认识的演变历程。毛泽东对私人资本主义认识的内在逻辑有三个动因。毛泽东20世纪50年代对私人资本主义认识的演变及其逻辑,对中国今天的特色社会主义建设仍有不少启示。     

资本主义社会内部是否能够孕育和形成社会主义因素?(下)--马克思恩格斯思想与列宁思想的比较

列宁虽然认为资本主义社会内部不能自发地孕育和形成社会主义因素，但他却和马克思、恩格斯一样。认为在资本主义社会内部可以孕育和形成向社会主义过渡的经济形式。     

Financialization,distribution, and macroeconomic regimes before and after the crisis: a post-Keynesian view on Denmark,Estonia, and Latvia

ABSTRACT

Since the early 1980s, financialization has become an increasingly important trend in developed capitalist countries, with different timing, speed, and intensities in different countries. Rising inequality has been a major feature of this trend. Shares of wages in national income have declined and personal income inequality has increased. Against this background unsustainable demand and growth regimes have developed that dominated the major economies before the crisis: the ‘debt-led private demand boom’ and the ‘export-led mercantilist’ regime. The article applies this post-Keynesian approach to the macroeconomics of finance-dominated capitalism of three Baltic Sea countries, Denmark, Estonia, and Latvia, both for the pre-crisis and the post-crisis period. First, the macroeconomics of finance-dominated capitalism are briefly reiterated. Second, the financialization-distribution nexus is examined for the three countries. Third, macroeconomic demand and growth regimes are analyzed, both before and after the crisis.     

Labour Unrest in Vietnam and China: Insurgency or Contained Contention?

This article reviews three recent books on labour politics in Vietnam and China: Angie Tran’s Ties That Bind: Cultural Identity, Class and Law in Vietnam’s Labor Resistance; Jeffrey Becker’s Social Ties, Resources and Migrant Labor Contention in Contemporary China: From Peasants to Protesters, and Eli Friedman’s Insurgency Trap: Labor Politics in Post-Socialist China. These three books capture the changing patterns of labour unrest and labour institutions in Vietnam and China, which are accounted for by the social foundation of resistance as well as the political economy of capitalist development. Their main contribution to the existing literature is that they draw out the new dynamics and new venues within the state that can both enable and constrain labour resistance and struggle in these countries. However, this article also argues that these works have not adequately theorised the nature of change within the state and the role of the law in labour resistance. It therefore suggests that bringing in the law to socio-political institutions is essential to a research agenda that explores continuity and change in labour politics in Vietnam and China as transitional economies.     

Varieties of hierarchical capitalism: family and state market economies in East Asia

Through an examination of East Asian economies, this paper proposes two new capitalist ideal types: family market economies and state market economies. In contrast to coordinated and liberal market economy types, the new capitalist ideal types proposed here display alternative forms of hierarchical coordination. These ideal types are also genuinely novel models of capitalism because they exhibit distinct and stable institutional structures and comparative advantages.     

苏东剧变以来法国马克思主义研究综述

苏联和东欧解体后,社会主义的前途迷雾重重,对马克思主义的否定论调声声迭起.这样的背景使得法国的马克思主义研究呈现出新的特点.法国马克思主义理论界围绕着社会主义的模式、资本主义的新变化和马克思主义理论的解读展开了广泛的研究和讨论,召开了一系列的会议,形成了一些具有代表性的观点.