Comparison of Anonymous Versus Confidential Survey Procedures: Effects on Health Indicators in Dutch Adolescents

Self-report questionnaires are frequently used in youth research, but doubt remains whether total anonymity affects the results. This study compared the responses of 704 mainly 16–17-year-old adolescents to self-report measures of various health indicators in 2 groups: anonymous and confidential collection. For most health indicators no significant differences were found. Perceived health, use of alcohol, and aggressive behavior (for boys) were reported significantly less frequently in the confidential group (small effect size). It appeared that pupils with high scores on social desirability do not respond differently at most health indicators in the 2 conditions. For most health characteristics, epidemiologically useful outcomes may be derived from confidential self-report measures, which are also valuable for detecting individual at-risk children. Similar studies in lower grades and other types of education should confirm the results.Youth Department, Municipal Health Service Rotterdam area. Main research interests are emotional and behavioral problems of adolescents, youth health care, monitoring.Youth Department, Municipal Health Service Rotterdam area. Main research interests are emotional and behavioral problems of adolescents, youth health care, monitoring.Research Department, Municipal Health Service Rotterdam area. Major research interests include emotional and behavioral problems of adolescents, suicidal behavior, youth health care, monitoring.     

NOT (QUITE) A HORSE AND CARRIAGE

This note critically interrogates the Civil Partnership Act 2004. Through an examination of the legislative background and some of the provisions of the Act, it is argued that civil partnership mirrors a marriage model with some exceptions. In creating this new legal status, the legislation also exacerbates the exclusion of some relationship forms from dominant legal norms. It should be understood as part of an agenda for social inclusion, rather than as radical social change.     

以素质教育为主题推进教育事业的全面发展

《中共中央关于制定国民经济和社会发展第十一个五年规划的建议》对科教兴国和人才强国战略作了重要部署。为了保证人才强国战略的实施,《建议》重申了坚持教育优先发展、全面实施素质教育的方针。为了贯彻这一方针,必须落实科学发展观,以素质教育为主题,着力完成“普及、发展、提高”三大任务,推进教育事业全面协调可持续发展。     

西部区域生态移民的科学性和运作模式——对甘肃省民勤县以水定人的调查和分析

本文以对甘肃省民勤县的深入调查为基础,按照以水定人的思路,在认真分析目前该县的水生态环境对人口发展、经济增长和社会进步的严重影响的基础上,提出了具体的生态移民的规划思路、移民设计和运作模式等。     

职务过失犯罪研究

职务过失犯罪是指国家工作人员在履行职务的过程中严重不负责任 ,失职不履行或者不正确履行自己的职责 ,应当预见到自己的失职行为可能造成危害社会的结果而疏忽大意没有预见 ,或者已经预见而轻信能够避免 ,致使公共财产、国家和人民利益遭受重大损失的行为。对职务过失犯罪的注意义务和认定 ,应采取抽象结果预见说 ;对职务过失犯罪的处罚 ,应重于技术过失犯罪和职业过失犯罪。     

Expanded School Mental Health: Challenges and Opportunities in an Emerging Field

Reviews the need for and development of expanded school mental health (ESMH) programs, which provide a continuum of mental health promotion and intervention through school–community partnerships. Since ESMH is a relatively new, but increasingly prominent field, countless issues are being addressed in practice and research and in efforts to bridge practice and research. We review particular content and context dimensions of ESMH in need of development including quality assessment and improvement, empirically supported practice, improving assessment and outcome evaluation, involving educators in the work, understanding school environments, and tailoring programs through qualitative research. Summaries of articles that amplify these themes are provided.     

论共同过失犯罪

共同过失犯罪是指负有共同平等注意义务的二个以上的行为人，由于共同的不注意，共同实施或者促成了违反共同注意义务的行为，造成危害结果发生的一种共同犯罪形态。共同过失犯罪是共同犯罪的一种客观存在形态。不能因为刑事立法的规定和传统刑法理论就否定其存在的价值，而将其排除在共同犯罪之外。在具体司法实践中在确定共同过失犯罪的刑事责任时应该考虑过失程度、行为人所处的地位和行为与结果发生的原因力的大小。     

“依法治国”和“以德治国”并举思想的重大理论意义和实践意义

江总书记提出的”依法治国”和“以德治国”的并举思想，是“法治”与“德治”辩证法的科学总结；是发展市场经济，建设有中国特色社会主义的客观要求；它不是简单的施政策略，而是新时期治理国家的伟大方略，所以具有十分重大的理论意义和实践意义。     

统筹城乡模式下的乡村治理:制度创新与模式设计

在比较中西四种乡村治理模式基础上,致力于从乡村治理演化轨迹、价值诉求方面探讨统筹城乡模式下的一体化、市场化、民主化、系统化价值目标体系,进而从四大主体、五大关系论证统筹城乡模式下乡村治理制度创新理念及其实现路径.     

试析统筹城乡发展与乡镇政府改革

乡镇政府作为直接面对农民的基层行政机构，在推动统筹城乡发展中具有重要作用。当前乡镇政府存在着一系列制约其作用发挥的问题,为此,要从乡镇政府的设置、乡镇职能的转变、乡镇机构的确定、乡镇工作人员的优化、乡镇财政管理的创新等方面进行改革，以提高乡镇政府的行政能力和服务水平。