论法律意义上的仲裁地点及其确定

The paper studies the concept of the place of arbitration in comparing with the legislation and practices of international commercial arbitration. It also stresses on the connection and distinction between the place of arbitration, the place of hearing, and the place where the arbitration tribunal deliberates the case, as well as the method of deciding the place of arbitration. The author also analyzes the current legislation and practices of the determination on the place of arbitration in China. The paper pointed out that it is important in both theory and practice to promote international arbitration in China and amend domestic arbitration legislation in determing place of arbitration properly. Zhao Xiuwen, professor, has been teaching international business law in the law school of Renmin University of China since 1984. She used to be a Fulbright research scholar in Georgetown Law Center of George Washington University and other universities (USA), and as a visiting professor in universities and research institutes (UK, Germany, Italy, Austria and Australia). She also works in the panel of China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC), World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb), Singapore International Arbitration Center (SIAC) and some local arbitration commissions in China. She is the author of several books and dozens of articles in the field of international business law and commercial arbitration, i.e. arbitration system in Hong Kong, international economic law, private international law, copyright, international commercial arbitration, international economic and trade arbitration law, etc.     

Decision Costs, Contract Excuse, and the Westinghouse Commercial Impracticability Case

The literature on performance excuses does not consider the cost of determining whether the conditions established for contract excuse are met. We must incorporate these costs to determine which contract laws are efficient. I show that while the costs of determining whether the conditions for excuse are met will rise with the value of the contested performance, the benefits are unrelated to the value of performance. I conclude that the court should not allow excuse if the value of the contested performance is large.     

票据行为无因性与物权行为无因性之比较

本文将票据行为无因性理论与物权行为无因性理论加以比较,试图从两种理论的发展渊源、适用范围、价值取向及对交易安全保护的功能是否有可替代性等几个方面,来说明前者的繁荣兴盛,而后者却日趋式微的奥秘所在。     

商业贿赂的公司治理控制

将公司治理理论作用于反商业贿赂领域是一种全新视角下的防治手段,其价值取向在于充分运用公司组织结构的自身力量治理防范各种在商业活动中极易出现的商业贿赂.以公司治理结构与反商业贿赂行为在主体与整体目标要素的契合,通过独立董事制度的建立与完善、强化公司内部相关主体的诚信义务和问责机制以及建立与运用公司社会责任机制等从公司自身制度层面最大限度地治理商业贿赂.     

传统中医药产业知识产权保护战略研究

传统的中医药产业面临着全球化发展趋势和知识经济社会的考验。在总结经验的同时要正视我国当前中医药产业技术落后、知识产权保护意识不强、企业规模小、观念和技术落后、片面发展等问题。正确运用知识产权保护战略,具体实施著作权、专利、商业秘密、商标等综合保护战略,是我国传统中医药产业发展中不能回避的现实问题。     

商业贿赂罪主体范围探讨

商业贿赂是广大人民群众所痛恨的社会公害。我国惩治商业贿赂的立法体系仍然存在很大的局限性,尤其是惩治商业贿赂犯罪的刑事立法依然不够完善,这在一定程度上影响了我国对商业贿赂的有效治理。本文针对我国商业贿赂犯罪主体范围存在的问题提出了完善措施。     

商业贿赂犯罪的动态特征与发展趋势

近年来,随着我国市场经济不断发展,发生在商品流通和服务行业等领域的商业贿赂行为并未得到切实有效地根治,作为一种具有动态意义的新型经济犯罪活动,其触角逐步伸入其他行业和领域,并呈现出一系列新的特点和发展态势。其动态变化特征主要有：犯罪形式多样,犯罪手段隐蔽,侦查难度加大;行业特点明显,发案部门集中,窝案串案突出;案件数目上升,涉案金额加大,大要案比例高;职务犯罪突出,主体特征明显,顶风作案严重。其发展趋势表现为：犯罪领域扩展,防控精度下降;作案手法翻新,查处难度加大;组织程度提高,期货特征明显;社会影响恶劣,危害程度加剧。各地应根据本地商贿犯罪现实情形与发展态势,建立健全惩防商贿犯罪的长效机制。     

论我国对招标过程中商业秘密的法律保护

商业秘密具有实用性,能给权利人带来经济价值。各国法律都对商业秘密进行保护。标底是商业秘密的属性常常被忽视。我国为标底提供了严密的法律保护,通过保护标底不受侵犯,来有效地规范招标过程中存在的不法现象。     

商贸英语长句的分类、理解与翻译

以商贸英语长句中的主要句子成分即主语、谓语与宾语为依据,可以将之分为四类：施动者复杂化、动作复杂化、受动者复杂化、以上二者或三者同时复杂化,理解商贸英语长句的根本就在于把复杂句简单化。     

强行法在国际商事仲裁中的适用

意思自治原则允许合同当事人选择支配其合同的实体法。在国际商事仲裁领域,仲裁员能否适用当事人所没有选择的相关强行法,理论认识中还存在分歧。从国际实践来看,合同履行地国的强行法被认为是与合同的联系更为密切,从而能够在仲裁中得以适用。强行法在国际商事仲裁中的适用是个不争的事实。在适用强行法方面,仲裁员的主要作用在于界定实体法,确定合同履行地及仲裁裁决实施地,甄别、解释有关的强行性法律。而强行法的适用同样有其特定的冲突规范,强行法在国际商事仲裁领域中的适用,构成对当事人选择支配合同实体法的自由的一个限制。