论法律意义上的仲裁地点及其确定

The paper studies the concept of the place of arbitration in comparing with the legislation and practices of international commercial arbitration. It also stresses on the connection and distinction between the place of arbitration, the place of hearing, and the place where the arbitration tribunal deliberates the case, as well as the method of deciding the place of arbitration. The author also analyzes the current legislation and practices of the determination on the place of arbitration in China. The paper pointed out that it is important in both theory and practice to promote international arbitration in China and amend domestic arbitration legislation in determing place of arbitration properly. Zhao Xiuwen, professor, has been teaching international business law in the law school of Renmin University of China since 1984. She used to be a Fulbright research scholar in Georgetown Law Center of George Washington University and other universities (USA), and as a visiting professor in universities and research institutes (UK, Germany, Italy, Austria and Australia). She also works in the panel of China International Economic & Trade Arbitration Commission (CIETAC), World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO), Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb), Singapore International Arbitration Center (SIAC) and some local arbitration commissions in China. She is the author of several books and dozens of articles in the field of international business law and commercial arbitration, i.e. arbitration system in Hong Kong, international economic law, private international law, copyright, international commercial arbitration, international economic and trade arbitration law, etc.     

Decision Costs, Contract Excuse, and the Westinghouse Commercial Impracticability Case

The literature on performance excuses does not consider the cost of determining whether the conditions established for contract excuse are met. We must incorporate these costs to determine which contract laws are efficient. I show that while the costs of determining whether the conditions for excuse are met will rise with the value of the contested performance, the benefits are unrelated to the value of performance. I conclude that the court should not allow excuse if the value of the contested performance is large.     

票据行为无因性与物权行为无因性之比较

本文将票据行为无因性理论与物权行为无因性理论加以比较,试图从两种理论的发展渊源、适用范围、价值取向及对交易安全保护的功能是否有可替代性等几个方面,来说明前者的繁荣兴盛,而后者却日趋式微的奥秘所在。     

商业受贿罪客观要件之我见

商业受贿罪的客观构成要件是一个颇具争议的问题。从国外立法和我国实际出发,在商业受贿罪客观构成要件中,“利用职务上的便利”既包括直接利用和间接利用,也包括利用过去职务之便和利用将来的职务之便;不应取消“为他人谋取利益”构成要素;“贿赂”应当包括财产性和非财产性利益。     

商业贿赂的公司治理控制

将公司治理理论作用于反商业贿赂领域是一种全新视角下的防治手段,其价值取向在于充分运用公司组织结构的自身力量治理防范各种在商业活动中极易出现的商业贿赂.以公司治理结构与反商业贿赂行为在主体与整体目标要素的契合,通过独立董事制度的建立与完善、强化公司内部相关主体的诚信义务和问责机制以及建立与运用公司社会责任机制等从公司自身制度层面最大限度地治理商业贿赂.     

传统中医药产业知识产权保护战略研究

传统的中医药产业面临着全球化发展趋势和知识经济社会的考验。在总结经验的同时要正视我国当前中医药产业技术落后、知识产权保护意识不强、企业规模小、观念和技术落后、片面发展等问题。正确运用知识产权保护战略,具体实施著作权、专利、商业秘密、商标等综合保护战略,是我国传统中医药产业发展中不能回避的现实问题。     

论劳动关系中的保密义务和竞业禁止

用人单位与劳动者约定竞业禁止可以减少用人单位商业秘密被侵犯的机会,但劳动者的保密义务不以当事人之间的明示约定为前提。用人单位与劳动者之间的竞业禁止协议必须建立在真正的契约自由的基础之上,以用人单位存在可保护的商业秘密为前提,并不得侵犯劳动者的基本人权。     

试论票据诈骗案件的认定

票据作为资金运动的重要载体,以其载负巨资的魅力吸引了许多不法分子,使票据诈骗成为金融诈骗案件中发案率最高的一种。由于此类犯罪具有与其他刑事犯罪交叉、参与犯罪主体庞杂等特点,认定时应从犯罪的行为方式、犯罪数额、行为人的主观故意、犯罪主体以及与合同诈骗罪的区别等不同侧面进行分析。     

侵犯商业秘密罪若干争议问题研究

侵犯商业秘密罪中的重大损失既包括直接损失,也包括间接损失。重大损失应限于物质损失,而不应包括因侵权而导致的荣誉、名誉的损失。重大损失与商业秘密的自身价值不能等同。认定侵犯商业秘密重大损失应综合考虑以权利人的损失、侵权人的获利或商业秘密的许可使用费进行计算。侵犯商业秘密罪是一种故意犯罪,其主观方面不应包括过失。侵犯商业秘密罪中的“应知”不同于刑法总则中的疏忽大意过失中对危害结果的“应当预见”,刑法分则中的“应知”是一种对犯罪对象的客观性预见,其应理解为“应可推为明知”,是一种推定故意的心理态度。     

国有商业银行公司治理结构改革探析

推进国有商业银行股份制改造,核心是建立完善的公司治理结构,能否构建有效的公司治理结构,决定着国有商业银行改革的成败。为此,必须针对国有商业银行公司治理结构存在的问题,从完善公司制度、优化组织结构、建立激励机制等方面采取相应的对策措施,以期实现国有商业银行公司治理结构改革的A目标。