论中英两国刑事证人证言可采性标准及检测方法

证人证言在刑事诉讼中的运用一直是各国主要关注的问题 ,而证言运用的核心又在于证言的可采性问题。本文从比较研究的角度 ,对中英两国刑事证人证言可采性标准及检测方法作了具体分析 ,认为中英两国刑事证明标准的不同 ,决定了两国证人证言可采性标准的差异 ,从而导致检测这一标准的方法也各异 ,并认为英国现行的刑事证明标准及由此决定的证言可采性标准有可资借鉴之处     

冷战后美欧的对华政策

冷战后美国和欧盟的对华政策明显地拉开了距离 ,他们的对华政策的调整变化是由各自所处的国际环境、经济利益和战略利益所决定的 ,它对美中关系、欧中关系的发展产生了重要的影响。     

New Thinking in Financial Market Regulation: Dismantling the “Split Share Structure” of Chinese Listed Companies

China’s distinctive set of stock market institutions was introduced in 1990. Among the characteristics of China’s stock markets was a strict separation between different categories of investors. Listed companies issued different categories of shares to state shareholders, domestic corporate investors, domestic individual investors, and foreign investors. By 2005, the barriers segmenting China’s stock market had been significantly relaxed. Domestic investors were allowed to purchase shares previously reserved for foreign investors, and approved foreign investors were allowed to purchase shares previously earmarked for domestic individuals. Nevertheless, a crucial barrier remained. An ongoing debate among Chinese academics, investors, and policy makers focused on how to resolve the “split share structure” (guquan fen zhi) in which a minority of shares were tradable while the majority of shares (namely those reserved for domestic corporate and state shareholders) were excluded from the market. The split share structure was blamed for distorting prices and inhibiting development of the stock market. This paper analyzes the policy adopted to address the split share structure. To what extent does this policy change reflect new thinking on the part of China’s market regulators? This paper argues that analysis of policy making in China’s capital markets can help to distinguish between two competing assessments of China’s political economy. One account sees China pursuing a gradualist strategy, slowly but steadily expanding the role of markets. Another account sees China trapped in a semi-marketized and increasingly corrupt development pattern. The implementation of the split share structure reform program provides evidence to support the gradualist account of incremental, but persistent, reform. Mary Comerford Cooper is an assistant professor in political science at the Ohio State University. Her recent research focuses on the politics of financial markets in China and Taiwan. Earlier versions of this paper were presented at the Comparative Politics Research Workshop/ Globalization, Institutions and Economic Security Workshop at Ohio State University in May 2007, and at the annual meeting of the Association for Chinese Political Studies in July 2007. I benefited greatly from the constructive and insightful comments of Bj?rn Alpermann, Melanie Barr, Jean-Marc Blanchard, Sarah Brooks, Joseph Fewsmith, Sujian Guo, Dane Imerman, Ryan Kennedy, Marcus Kurtz, Xiaoyu Pu, James Reilly, Alex Thompson, Daniel Verdier, Jianwei Wang, Alan Wiseman, Bin Yu, and an anonymous reviewer. I am also grateful for Lan Hu’s exceptional research assistance. All remaining flaws are purely my own.     

积极探索提高党依法执政能力的实现形式

中国共产党在55年长期的革命和改革实践中,逐步形成了一整套执政方式和领导方法。随着社会主义市场经济的确定和发展,党所处的地位和环境、党肩负的历史使命、党的自身状况等,都发生了新的变化。及时总结执政方式和领导方法上的经验教训,根据新的实践加以改革、创新,对全面建设小康社会,推进中国特色社会主义事业,具有极其重要的意义。     

近年来公平与效率关系研究综述

在经济效率大幅度提高的同时,居民收入分配上的差距却日益扩大,已经是一个不争的事实。现阶段,如何科学定位公平与效率二者关系问题,如何把握好个人收入差距的“度”,是摆在我们面前的一个急需在实践中加以妥善解决的重大课题。     

新形势下完善《国籍法》的思考

《中华人民共和国国籍法》公布实施至今已二十六年。随着我国对外开放的进一步发展,国际交往日益增多,新的国籍问题也时有出现。由于《国籍法》独立性较强,在司法实践中,一些特殊案例又无法借用其他相应的法律,因此,迫切需要对《国籍法》加以完善和修改,同时还要规范执法。     

马克思主义民族发展理论在当代中国的实践与创新

民族发展理论是马克思主义民族理论的重要组成部分。新中国成立后,中国共产党和中国政府在社会主义革命和建设的实践中。继承和发展了马克思主义民族发展理论,经历了以政治平等为特征的发展理论——以经济建设为中心的发展理论——全面协调发展理论的演变过程,形成了具有中国特色的民族发展理论,极大地促进了少数民族现代化建设。     

中美公共政策评估系统比较及启示

构思精美,设计精良的政策并非都能达到预期的效果.由于认知的局限性和政策的复杂性,在政策实践中,事与愿违的现象是普遍存在的.因此,政策评估至关重要.现代意义上的政策评估兴起于上世纪60一70年代的美国,而我国在引进政策科学后总体上仍处于"引进"阶段,尚未完全完成"消化、吸收尤其是创新"过程.本文通过比较研究中美两国在公共政策评估系统的差异,从评估者、评估对象、评估目的、评估标准和评估方法五个方面对比分析,得出一些针对我国公共政策评估系统存在问题的启示.     

中国公共管理的“公共性”释义

“公共性”是一个分析现代政府活动性质和行为的重要工具,对公共管理的“公共性”的探讨有利于国家公共政策的制定与执行,对处在转型期的中国而言,研究政府公共管理的“公共性”在这种特定环境与制度下的内涵更具有重要意义。本文从根本理念层面、道德层面和政治过程层面来解释公共管理的“公共性”内容,分析了我国政府对公共管理的根本理念定位———公众满意,国家公务员的公共行政道德责任建设及公民参与对“公共性”实现的重要作用。     

党政机构合并背景下的预算问题研究

2018年进行的党和国家机构改革对我国现行预算制度提出了新的挑战,现行预算制度无法适应机构改革的新情况。党政合并后的新机构属于党的机构体系,不再属于政府机构体系,而现行预算制度的约束主体是政府,无法约束合并后的新机构。由于预算完整性和新机构职能的公共性等原因,新机构应当受到国家法律组成的预算制度的约束,预算制度需要配合机构改革进行调整,党内法规不应成为新机构预算行为的规范来源。机构改革强调党的领导是上层领导,并不影响人大预算职权的具体执行,虽然新机构属于党的机构,但由于其参与行政活动,行使国家权力,使用国家财政经费,故仍需接受人大的预算审查监督。