当代心理学关于创造性才能研究的回顾与前瞻

人类对创造性才能的认识从主观走向主体。当代心理学对创造性才能的本质内涵、静态结构、动态特征、人格因素、物质基础等的研究共识 ,使创造性才能研究成为科学。确立创造性才能是人的主体性集中体现的科学认识论和科学方法论根本原则 ;使定量研究与定性研究相结合 ,多角度地透视创造性才能的静态结构和动态规律 ;确立从生活实际中探索创造性才能的发生发展规律并应用于创造性才能培养的最终研究目标 ,是未来创造性才能心理学研究的科学思路     

高校民族图案设计教学探究

民族图案设计教学探究是借民族图案设计对高校教学进行剖析,从艺术共性引入研究图案变化开始,对民族图案的民族性、造型、整体性、线的使用、色性等表现手法进行论述,针对培养学生想象力、创造力、表现力,培养学生创新思维探究。发扬光大富有地域特色的民族文化艺术,每个设计者从中可获得许多有益借鉴与启示。     

LETTERS

正People with good sense all agree that China has grown stronger in terms of innovation,though it is indisputable that globally the country still ranks well below the top-tier innovators.On this issue,attention always focuses on research institutions and industries,which stand at the forefront of innovative ideas and practices.In fact,we need to examine the upper streams of creativity–in education.June is exam season:9th graders take the exam to enter senior     

研究性课堂教学及其心理效应

提出研究性课堂教学的命题,是对陈腐、僵化教学模式的挑战.以人为本,开发课堂教学的生命潜力,是研究性课堂教学的价值追求.倡导研究性课堂教学,对培养创造型人才具有现实性和前瞻性意义.     

试论现行公安院校教育对学生创造力发展的阻碍和突破

高等教育长期存在的一个弊病就是学生有比较扎实的基础知识和基本技能,但缺乏创新意识和创造能力。我们的公安教育要突破对学生创造力发展的阻碍,在培养学生的创造性方面发挥应有的作用,就必须对现行的学校教育进行改革。培养学生的创造力难点何在?本文对此从几个方面进行了探讨。     

高校学术创新的途径和促进措施

创新将成为社会生产力解放和发展的重要基础和标志,成为驱动经济发展和社会进步的最根本的原动力。选择相应的创新机构,促进经济的发展,是我们必须关注的话题。在现代社会,高等院校已经成为先进科技研发的前沿阵地,成为创新人才培养的最佳摇篮。这意味着高等院校必须成为知识创新的基地,才能有效地推动经济发展和社会进步。     

创意的思路与方法

本文从创意的概念着手,对为什么要创意,成功创意的原则和怎样做好创意作了积极的思考和探索.对启发和提高设计工作者的创意思维有着重要的参考价值.     

论公安学报在新世纪的发展思路

公安院校学报在新世纪面临新的机遇和挑战，只有抓住机遇、完善自我、迎接挑战，才是其生存与发展的必然选择。欲使其自秀于期刊之林，就必须明确学术定位，树立精品意识，发扬创新精神，提高编辑素养，重视信息传播。     

非公有制企业团组织在创新创效活动中的作用

青年职工创新创效活动,是以企业青年职工为主体,以创新为手段,以创效为目的的群众性创新活动.通过对瓯海区部分非公有制企业和青年职工的调查,总结分析在青年职工创新创效活动中存在的问题,并就团组织的作用发挥提出针对性建议.     

Creativity in Court‐Connected Mediation: Myth or Reality?

In this study, we examined creativity in court‐connected mediation. We analyzed 129 mediated agreements from civil cases in Norway and Denmark and compared the outcomes with the parties' original claims to determine whether the agreement addressed only the disputants' demands or contained other elements. If the mediated agreements contained elements in addition to the original claims, we considered them to be “creative.” We devised a creativity scale and found that approximately two thirds of the cases contained creative elements and one quarter of them contained more than five creative elements. We then sought to determine which aspects of the mediation promoted creativity by looking at a variety of mediation characteristics (length of mediation, characteristics of the parties, etc.). We found that lengthier mediations tended to feature more creativity as did cases that involved two private individuals rather than businesses. Cases whose issues involved inheritance as well as the division of property following divorce seemed to foster the highest levels of creativity. Finally, we found that the amount of money at issue also seemed to be relevant: the highest levels of creativity were found in cases in which more money was at stake. In this article, we also discuss the implications of our findings for future research, practice, and training.