“见危不救”犯罪化的层次分析

社会对见危不救行为是否定的.对其价值判断的这种一致性,使得对其犯罪化不只是可能,而且是必要的.对见危不救行为动用刑罚加以调整,使人们自愿承担救人于危难间的义务,以促进社会的整体利益.我国刑法中应增加"见危不救罪",但要有严格的范围限制.     

刑法主观主义之生成根基

刑法主观主义生成的根本推动力是经济因素。经济结构的变迁引起社会结构的变迁,而伴随社会结构的变迁,犯罪必然呈现出新特征,最终导致刑事犯罪治理策略取向由个人本位转向社会本位,从而导致刑法主观主义生成并渐趋强势。刑法主观主义并非只是为了作为客观主义的对立面而生成,而是对时代变迁的必然回应,是时代的必然产物。     

Developmental trends of delinquent attitudes and behaviors: replications and synthesis across domains, time, and samples

Inconsistent findings of attitude-behavior relations are commonly attributed to uncontrolled domain, time, or situational factors. Without integrative work, studies accounting for these factors may further complicate research by introducing potentially numerous third variables and render a coherent understanding of the attitude-behavior relationship even more difficult to achieve. In this paper, a developmental perspective is taken and the attitude-behavior relationship in delinquency is examined using three modes of investigation: multivariate patterns of attitude-behavior associations, their mutual predictability, and their developmental trajectories. Three grade cohorts of public school boys (n=1517 of the first, seventh, and tenth grades, initially) were followed over a period of 4 years, with an average age span of 7–16 years. Correspondence analyses suggested that adolescent boys with a tolerant attitude toward theft or violence were more deviant than those who had actual behavior of theft or violence. Stronger attitude effect on subsequent behavior, relative to behavior effect on subsequent attitudes, was found among boys aged 10–12 years. While mean scores of tolerant attitudes to serious theft and violence increased linearly with their behavior counterparts between 6 and 17 years of age, ages 11 and 14 were two turning points at which most delinquent attitudes and behaviors escalated at a higher speed. In general, delinquent attitudes and behaviors were related to each other in various patterns, and age was a defining factor that provided much of the explanation for the inconsistencies in research findings.     

论我国刑事诉讼证据种类的完善

我国刑事诉讼法所规定的证据种类不能全面概括司法实践中起证明作用的材料,建议立法补充相应的证据种类。刑事诉讼法规定的各种证据的归类和排序存在缺乏逻辑性和实用性的问题,必须加以调整。     

论口供

口供作为刑事证据之一 ,在案件侦查和审理中所发挥的作用 ,历来为广大办案人员所重视。本文拟对口供的概念、历史、现状、属性、举证责任等进行论述。     

虚开增值税专用发票犯罪的侦查与控制

虚开增值税专用发票犯罪的发生率不断上升,犯罪涉案金额越来越大,国家税收流失非常严重,呈现出严峻态势,必须加强对这类犯罪的侦查和控制。为此,要大力加强增值税专用发票的管理工作,加强公安机关与工商、税务等部门的协调合作;在侦查工作中,应及时调查相关企业的工商税务和银行资料并取证,及时发现犯罪嫌疑人和控制赃款赃物。     

形式正义:刑事侦查的程序价值分析

刑事侦查程序不仅应当具有致成自由、秩序等的实体性价值 ,而且应当具有独立、中立、平等、参与、科学等程序性价值或者说形式价值。我们在构建公正、科学的现代刑事侦查制度时 ,必须充分关注和考量刑事侦查程序的形式正义性     

“防患于未然”的警醒与探讨——兼论我国刑法第306条的存与废

我国刑法自1997年修改之后,刑法第306条关于辩护人、诉讼代理人毁灭证据、伪造证据、妨害作证罪的规定就备受法律界尤其是律师界的关注,取消刑法第306条的议案屡次被提交全国人民代表大会。有人认为刑法第306条属于职业歧视,导致职业报复现象的发生和法律的重置,使律师不愿代理刑事案件,造成司法人员和律师在法律上的不平等,影响律师权益的保障。笔者通过对上述观点的分析,提出如何正确对待和完善该条法律规定的建议。     

论刑法立法解释

刑法立法解释应当限于以全国人大常委会名义颁布的专门解释,它应当与刑法草案说明、刑法解释性条文、立法解释性文件、立法解释性意见相区别。刑法立法解释的对象限于刑法的重要原则、基本概念和检、法两家在某些问题上形成分歧不能达成共识的情形,它作为刑法改进与刑法司法解释的中间物,其独特价值在于明确概念、澄清争议、统一司法。从完善的立场看,该种解释应注意必要、及时和规范三个方面。     

主体建构性和主体行为宣成性--一种后现代女权主义理论

后现代女权主义以解构主义为目的,放弃了对女性解放具体目标的追求,尽心去解构父权制及男权思想导致的性别歧视和性别压迫,并在此基础上提出了社会性别规定性、主体建构性、主体行为宣成性等理论观点,希望通过打破一些诸如性别、阶级等重要界线,来消除性别不平等.本文试对后现代女权主义这些理论观点、主要代表人物及不足等进行分析和探讨,以期对后现代女权主义有一个较为深入和准确的把握,推动女权主义理论的发展.