老年诈骗犯罪被害的社会对策研究

社会原因是老年诈骗犯罪被害的深层原因,社会对策是预防和处理老年诈骗犯罪被害的治本之策。老年诈骗犯罪被害的社会对策包括刑事法律方面的对策、其他法律方面的对策和社会政策方面的对策。只有从以上三个方面全面着手,充分考虑老年群体的特点,加强对老年群体的特别保护,进行综合治理,才能有效地预防和处理老年诈骗犯罪被害。     

Addressing identity crime in crime management information systems: Definitions,classification, and empirics

Identity fraud as a term and concept in its formative stages was often presumed to be identity theft and visa versa. However, identity theft is caused by the identities (or tokens) of individuals or organisations being stolen is an enabling precursor to identity fraud. The boundaries of identity fraud and identity theft are now better defined. The absence of specific identity crime legislation could be a cause of perpetrators not classified as breaching identity crimes but under other specific entrenched law such as benefit fraud, or credit card fraud. This metrics overlap can cause bias in crime management information systems. This study uses a multi-method approach where data was collected in both a quantitative and qualitative manner. These approaches are used as a lens for defining different classes of online identity crimes in a crime management (IS) security context. In doing so, we contribute to a deeper understanding of identity crime by specifically examining its hierarchical classes and definitions; to aid clearer structure in crime management IS. We seek to answer the questions: should current law around identity fraud continue to be reinforced and measures introduced to prevent identity crime; should laws be amended; or should new identity crime laws be constructed? We conclude and recommend a solution incorporating elements of all three.     

On the Limits of Social Control: Structural Deterrence and the Policing of “Suppressible” Crimes

The present study examined the relationships between patterns of police arrests and subsequent variations in robbery, burglary, and aggravated assault in New York City police precincts from 1989 to 1998. Grounded in the structural deterrence theoretical perspective, and using a two‐stage fixed‐effects statistical framework, the study found that while controlling for indicators of social disorganization, increases in arrest vigor (i.e., arrests per officer for violent crimes in each precinct and raw arrest counts) predicted decreases in robbery and burglary, but that the relationships were non‐linear: as arrest vigor increased, robbery and burglary crime decreased; when arrest thresholds were reached, however, both robbery and burglary crime rates became positively associated with arrest aggressiveness. Conversely, variations in aggressive arrest patterns had no significant effect on aggravated assault, supporting the suppressible crimes arguments that primarily economically motivated crimes, and those that tend to occur in public settings, are most likely deterred by aggressive police practices.     

不当行使所有权的刑法评析——以案例分析、学说检讨为中心论

以不法手段行使所有权该如何定性,无论在理论界还是司法实务界都颇有争议。如果立足于我国刑法的相关规定,对我国夺取型财产罪的法益采取修正的所有权说,并对最高人民法院公布的两则案例进行实质分析,可以得出合理结论:即行为人如果只是单纯地取回自己所有而被他人占有的财物,不构成财产犯罪,侵犯其他法益的按其他罪名处理;如果行为人在取回财产后又进行索赔,应按诈骗罪论处。     

论集资诈骗罪死刑的配置旨趣及最终命运

我国刑法对集资诈骗罪配置死刑,体现了对国有银行金融业务的强有力的保护、对民间资本流向的严格管制以及对社会稳定的极大关注.对集资诈骗罪的配置死刑无必要,应在下次刑法修正时果断废除集资诈骗罪的死刑,可对刑法第199条采取标注括号“废除”的形式进行处理,对其进行整体废除.     

论可撤销合同的法律形式

法律必然要适应社会经济的发展,我国合同法也必然随着我国社会主义市场经济的发展而不断演变,因此,必须对合同法中各项制度加以完善,特别是对可撤销合同的完善。本文通过对可撤销合同的法律形式的研究,进而探讨可撤销合同中存在的相关问题。不仅对合同当事人在合同实践中做出正确的合同行为具有指导意义,而且有利于法院和仲裁机构在审理合同纠纷案件时,做出正确的判决或裁决。     

浅析贷款诈骗犯罪手段、特点及侦查对策

随着我国贷款金融业务的日益发展,贷款诈骗犯罪活动也随之产生并愈益严重,已成为诱发区域性金融风险和金融危机、阻碍我国经济市场化进程的重要因素。文章旨在通过对贷款诈骗常见的作案手段和作案特点的分析,提出侦查对策。     

论诈骗罪的欺骗行为

本文就诈骗罪中欺骗行为的争议问题进行了探讨,认为欺骗行为的实质在于使受骗者陷入或继续维持处分财产的认识错误并进而处分财产;欺骗行为既包括就过去或现在的事实进行欺骗,也包括就将来的事实进行欺骗,还包括就价值判断进行欺骗;欺骗行为既可以是作为,也可以是不作为;欺骗行为既可以表现为使他人陷入错误,也可以表现为在他人已经陷入错误的情况下,使他人继续维持错误;欺骗行为必须达到足以使一般人陷入或者维持错误的程度。     

保险诈骗案件侦查方略初探

保险诈骗犯罪对保险业的健康发展构成严重威胁。保险诈骗案件侦查应把握好以下环节:做好报案登记与谈话,详细了解发案经过;认真勘查出险现场;严格审查相关的证明文件和卷宗;研究投保、索赔经过,发现骗赔征象;围绕案件关键问题进行技术鉴定;加强与保险公司的联系,主动挖掘保险诈骗线索等。     

合同诈骗罪若干问题探究

合同诈骗罪主观上是以非法占有为目的。"非法占有",是指对合法财产所有权的破坏,它与民法上的非法占有含义不同,也与非法占用含义不同。合同诈骗罪与经济合同纠纷的界限主要在于从主观目的上加以区别。对非法目的的判断,在我国采用司法推定的方法来确定。对于司法推定应当允许被告人提出反证,以防止出现冤假错案。