道德善、理性化与法的规范性——以哈特理论为中心的反省

法律的规范性是法律理论中最为重要的法律概念之一,并且学者通常以“应当”作为规范性的核心含义。然而,如果进一步追问何谓“应当”,那么就会逐渐引出“可辩护性”的概念。哈特的法律理论之所以是重要的,就因为是他首先意识到可辩护性的重要意义。不过,可辩护性背后隐含着“道德善”的概念,那么这是否意味着法律实证主义主张是错误的？并不必然,要想系统说明应当、可辩护性与道德善这三个概念,就必须借助对于“理性化框架”的整体说明,而法律实证主义在这其中就存在着诸种成立的可能性。     

我国社区矫正的立法展望

我国现行的指导社区矫正试点的规范性文件法律层级效力太低，造成社区矫正制度在实践中执行不力。我国应该制定专门的、隶属于刑事执行法体系的社区矫正法，统一社区行刑的方式，建立有剐于成年人的未成年人社区矫正制度。     

一座新的宫殿——《欧陆法律史概览:事件、渊源、人物及运动》译余剩语

《欧陆法律史概览:事件、渊源、人物及运动》是美国法学院协会"大陆法史系列丛书"中的第一卷。此书除第一编、第九编外,其他七编均以国别为经,又以各国法律发展中的主要时期为纬,描述各国法律发展中的几大要素,即事件、渊源、人物及运动。在很大程度上,它不仅是一部介绍欧陆各国(不包括斯拉夫法系、拜占庭法系及匈牙利法系)法制史概况的书籍,还是一部法学史作品。意大利法、瑞士法、斯堪的那维亚法及西班牙法等内容研究角度别致,内容新颖。本书的用功最勤之处,不在于它的理论建构,而在于其正本清源,旨在说明什么是真的法律史。法学译著应该注意主要遵循"名从主人"、"约定俗成"、"服从主科"和"尊重规范"等翻译原则。     

A CONSUMER-WELFARE APPROACH TO NETWORK NEUTRALITY REGULATION OF THE INTERNET

"Network neutrality" is the shorthand for a proposed regimeof economic regulation for the Internet. Because of the trendto deliver traditional telecommunications services, as wellas new forms of content and applications, by Internet protocol(IP), a regime of network neutrality regulation would displaceor subordinate a substantial portion of existing telecommunicationsregulation. If the United States adopts network neutrality regulation,other industrialized nations probably will soon follow. As aresult of their investment to create next-generation broadbandnetworks, network operators have the ability to innovate insidethe network by offering both senders and receivers of informationgreater bandwidth and prioritization of delivery. Network neutralityregulation would, among other things, prevent providers of broadbandInternet access service (such as digital subscriber line (DSL)or cable modem service) from offering a guaranteed, expediteddelivery speed in return for the payment of a fee. The practicaleffect of banning such differential pricing (called "accesstiering" by its critics) would be to prevent the pricing ofaccess to content or applications providers according to priorityof delivery. To the extent that an advertiser of a good or servicewould be willing to contract with a network operator for advertisingspace on the network operator's affiliated content, anotherpractical effect of network neutrality regulation would be toerect a barrier to vertical integration of network operatorsinto advertising-based business models that could supplementor replace revenues earned from their existing usage-based businessmodels. Moreover, by making end-users pay for the full costof broadband access, network neutrality regulation would denybroadband access to the large number of consumers who wouldnot be able to afford, or who would not have a willingness topay for, what would otherwise be less expensive access. Forexample, Google is planning to offer broadband access to end-usersfor free in San Francisco by charging other content providersfor advertising. This product offering is evidently predicatedon the belief that many end-users demand discounted or freebroadband access that is paid for by parties other than themselves.Proponents of network neutrality regulation argue that suchrestrictions on the pricing policies of network operators arenecessary to preserve innovation on the edges of the network,as opposed to innovation within the network. However, recognizingthat network congestion and real-time applications demand somedifferential pricing according to bandwidth or priority, proponentsof network neutrality regulation would allow broadband Internetaccess providers to charge higher prices to end-users (but notcontent or applications providers) who consume more bandwidthor who seek priority delivery of certain traffic. Thus, thedebate over network neutrality is essentially a debate overhow best to finance the construction and maintenance of a broadbandnetwork in a two-sided market in which senders and receivershave additive demand for the delivery of a given piece of information—andhence additive willingness to pay. Well-established tools ofRamsey pricing from regulatory economics can shed light on whethernetwork congestion and recovery of sunk investment in infrastructureare best addressed by charging providers of content and applications,broadband users, or both for expedited delivery. Apart fromthis pricing problem, an analytically simpler component of proposednetwork neutrality regulation would prohibit a network operatorfrom denying its users access to certain websites and Internetapplications, such as voice over Internet protocol (VoIP). Althoughsome instances of blocking of VoIP have been reported, suchconduct is not a serious risk to competition. To address thisconcern, I analyze whether market forces (that is, competitionamong access providers) and existing regulatory structures aresufficient to protect broadband users. I conclude that economicwelfare would be maximized by allowing access providers to differentiateservices vis-à-vis providers of content and applicationsin value-enhancing ways and by relying on existing legal regimesto protect consumers against the exercise of market power, shouldit exist.     

左琴科《一本浅蓝色的书》的两种改造

迫于时代的政治"大势",苏联幽默作家左琴科在其作品《一本浅蓝色的书》中做了"自我改造".改造之一是将他之前创作的幽默小说大量改写,变揭露为歌颂;改造之二是他在作品中大兴文体革新,将历史纳入文学,通过历史与现实的对照,无情揭示了现实的本相.因而改造的结果是,左琴科有意无意地坚守了自己的"道",作品也获得与"自我改造"宗旨既一致又矛盾的复杂意蕴.     

社会主义市场经济体制改革理论创新

党的十六大提出新世纪头20年全面建设小康社会的宏伟目标,从十六届三中全会确定的主题看,推进小康社会建设,首先应抓深化改革,从完善社会主义市场经济体制入手,按照“五个统筹”的要求完善新体制,使股份制成为公有制的主要实现形式,建立健全现代产权制度,这是一项现实的选择和正确的决策,必将有力地推进我国社会主义现代化建设事业的蓬勃发展。     

一次失败的窃火——中国第一种小说期刊《海上奇书》论略

《海上奇书》是中国文学发展史上第一种小说期刊,它的创刊在新闻出版史和小说发展史上都具有重要意义,表明了中国新闻事业的发展趋向细密化分工,出现了以刊载小说为主的专业刊物。同时,它的问世标志着一种全新的小说创作方式和传播模式的诞生,对于研究刊载其上的晚清方言小说《海上花列传》也具有版本学的价值。     

脑络通对气虚血瘀证脑缺血大鼠作用机理研究

目的：探讨脑络通对气虚血瘀证脑缺血大鼠作用机理,为脑络通的临床应用提供实验依据。方法：采用多因素病证结合气虚血瘀脑缺血大鼠模型,观察了局部脑组织血流量（ｒＣＢＦ）,脑水肿,血流流变性,血浆血栓素Ａ２（ＴＸＡ２）及前列环素（ＰＧＩ２）的变化,结果：脑络通能显著增加模型鼠ｒＣＢＦ,减轻脑水肿程度（Ｐ〈０．０１）,能显著改善模型鼠血流变性,能显著降低模型鼠血浆ＴＸＢ２水平,升高ＰＧＩ２水平（Ｐ〈０．０５     

英语A、B级无纸化考试系统简析

借助于计算机技术的英语网络无纸化考试系统,对节约考试成本,提高考试效率,确保考试结果的公平、公正、科学、及时等具有重要的意义。广东省英语A、B级网络无纸化考试模式由五大子系统组成,采用WEB和WindowsMedia技术,便于客户端的维护,具有较强的网络故障适应能力,可进行听力或口语在线考试,实现了考试管理的创新。