Humans forget,machines remember: Artificial intelligence and the Right to Be Forgotten

This article examines the problem of AI memory and the Right to Be Forgotten. First, this article analyzes the legal background behind the Right to Be Forgotten, in order to understand its potential applicability to AI, including a discussion on the antagonism between the values of privacy and transparency under current E.U. privacy law. Next, the authors explore whether the Right to Be Forgotten is practicable or beneficial in an AI/machine learning context, in order to understand whether and how the law should address the Right to Be Forgotten in a post-AI world. The authors discuss the technical problems faced when adhering to strict interpretation of data deletion requirements under the Right to Be Forgotten, ultimately concluding that it may be impossible to fulfill the legal aims of the Right to Be Forgotten in artificial intelligence environments. Finally, this article addresses the core issue at the heart of the AI and Right to Be Forgotten problem: the unfortunate dearth of interdisciplinary scholarship supporting privacy law and regulation.     

法律修改时条文序号整理模式分析

修改法律要伴随着法律条文序号的整理,在我国的立法实践中,基本上是采用全部条文重排的模式。但是,在法律修改时采用全部条文序号重排模式具有严重的弊端,容易引起相关法律制度不必要的连锁修改,容易导致因修改法律而产生技术性的疏漏,容易扰乱法律共同体的集体记忆,容易妨碍对既有法学文献的顺畅阅读。因此,在法律修改时根据条文删除或增加的情况,选用适当的条文序号整理模式是有很大社会效益的立法技术措施。     

血细胞线粒体DNA4977缺失与年龄的相关性

目的检测不同年龄组人活体血细胞线粒体DNA4977碱基缺失情况及其与年龄的相关性。方法根据Anderson标准序列设计mtDNA恒定区和mtDNA4977特异缺失区引物,采用实时荧光定量PCR技术,对110份不同年龄组人活体血细胞mtDNA4977缺失水平进行检测。结果在23岁以下个体中未检出mtDNA4977缺失,在大于23岁的被检个体中检测到mtDNA4977缺失,年龄越大,越容易检测到缺失。结论人mtDNA4977缺失与年龄有一定的相关性。     

Y染色体微缺失和突变的全同胞关系鉴定

目的探讨Y染色体微缺失和突变时,两男性个体间的全同胞关系鉴定。方法提取两样本DNA,检测Y-STR分型及常染色体STR分型,通过IBS法、ITO法及全同胞-无关个体判别函数法计算两个体间的全同胞关系。结果 33个Y-STR基因座中有2个基因座存在突变,其中一样本存在19个基因座的缺失。两样本IBS为53,大于阈值42;累积全同胞关系指数为1.36×10~(16),远远大于19;全同胞-无关个体判别函数D_(FS2)D_(R2)。因此倾向于认为两个体为全同胞。结论对于Y染色体微缺失和突变需要进行父系鉴定的情况,可以综合应用IBS法、ITO法以及全同胞-无关个体判别函数法以得出更为可靠的鉴定意见。