民事诉讼法前沿理论问题

体系问题是民事诉讼法修订中最重要的问题:在未来的民事诉讼法中是否需要保留证据制度、再审制度、执行制度、非讼程序等尚需进一步探讨;破产程序应从民事诉讼法中剔除;应当增加人事诉讼程序、法律审、小额诉讼、诉讼费用、第三人撤销诉讼、票据诉讼等规定.另外,起诉制度、一事不再理原则、证明责任、证明标准、民事检察监督等需要进一步完善.     

行政强制执行的权限划分

我国行政强制执行模式的实质在于行政强制执行权限在法院与行政机关之间如何划分。本文认为 :除依照法律规定行政机关自行强制执行的案件外 ,行政机关申请法院强制执行的案件 ,法院只负责按一定标准审查、裁定是否予以强制执行 ,具体执行则由申请的行政机关负责     

Legal Theory and Sociological Facts

The authors investigate MacCormick and Weinberger's claim that the Institutional Theory of Law provides a conceptual framework for the study of legal phenomena from a socio-legal point of view. They evaluate this claim by confronting both the Institutional Theory of Law and Weinberger's theory of action with two approaches in socio-legal theory, i.e. the instrumentalist and the constitutive approach. The conclusion is that the Institutional Theory of Law lends itself to empirical research from an instrumentalist perspective, for both place the concept institution in the context of law. Weinberger's theory of action may provide a basis for empirical research from a constitutive perspective. The authors make some suggestions for refinement of Weinberger's theory of action in order that the relation between institutions and action can be labeled dynamic.     

Unwilling to Forget: Local Memory Initiatives in Post-Franco Spain

It has been abundantly argued that the Spanish transition was based on an implicit ‘pact of silence’ by which the main political forces accepted to leave the thorniest aspects of past behind as the only way to peacefully construct a democratic future. And it has been widely accepted that Spanish society subscribed to this. This article defends a more nuanced version of this state-level agreement by focusing on memory-related initiatives at the local level. By doing so, it poses some challenges to existing literature on the politics of memory in general and the Spanish transition in particular.     

现代型诉讼的意义、性质和特点

本文从解决现代工业化社会产生的新型纠纷入手,对传统民事诉讼的构造及理论提出了反思,并从实证立场探索现代型诉讼体系的建立和发展。     

Preference for the Merit Principle Scale: An Individual Difference Measure of Distributive Justice Preferences

The present paper describes the development and validation of the Preference for the Merit Principle (PMP) Scale, a measure to assess people's preference for allocating outcomes on the basis of the distributive justice principle of merit. On the basis of data from a large sample of undergraduate students, we tested the construct and predictive validity of the scale and compared the results with the performance of two existing justice scales (Rasinski's, 1987, Proportionality Scale, and Rubin and Peplau's, 1975, Belief in a Just World Scale). Overall, we found that the PMP Scale had superior construct validity as compared with the Proportionality Scale. In brief, the PMP Scale was more independent of conceptually distinct constructs, such as prejudice and right-wing authoritarianism. In addition, unlike the Proportionality and Just World Scales, the PMP Scale was able to predict participants' future attitudes toward affirmative action     

地方政府征地补偿机制理性分析

现行的征地补偿制度以地方政府垄断经营土地一级市场,征地按土地的原用途补偿为两大基本特征,从而构成了土地管理上的利益驱动,并与兼顾失地农民的合法权益形成了一种博弈关系。征地补偿存在为公共利益的需要征地与所有非农建设都要征地之间、土地补偿的低偿性与土地价值增值性之间、征地主体地位的强势性与农民利益保护脆弱性之间、征地建设谋发展与让被征地者分享发展成果之间等深层矛盾。完善征地补偿机制必须实行制度创新,从改革地方政府征地绩效评估机制入手,解决征地补偿、就业安置、社会保障等方面存在的突出问题。     

刑事诉权导论

刑事诉权理论是刑事诉讼法学的理论基础。其内涵表现为它是向国家审判机关请求的权利,是宪法性基本权利,是程序涵义和实体涵义的统一。其外延在程序上表现为公诉机关的公诉权、刑事自诉人的自诉权和被告人的应诉权,在实体上表现为控辩双方的期待胜诉权。其本质特征表现为它是由宪法保障、国民平等享有的权利,对审判权具有制约性,自身具有程序性。刑事诉权理论为当事人主义审判机制的存在和发展及侦查权的刑事诉权属性奠定了理论基础,为当事人在刑事诉讼中的具体权利的合理配置、公诉案件中被害人诉讼主体地位及一些新型刑事诉讼制度和原则的引进和确立提供了理论依据。     

Toward a psychological ecology of affirmative action

Research-based knowledge of the effects of affirmative action has been little help to policy makers. That is the case because there has been no means through which to organize into a policy-relevant whole the findings that have come from a variety of disciplinary sources. A heuristic schematic of the psychological ecology of affirmative action is proposed as a step toward developing a conceptual framework that can reduce this problem. A psychological ecology of affirmative action consists of the mutual relations between policy interest groups and the procedures used to implement these policies. A critical point that the ecological framework leads to is that the nature of affirmative action procedures has a major influence on the material and subjective links between interest groups. Given that claim, the schematic is used to categorize, review, and critique the multidisciplinary research on affirmative action. From that overview, a set of general guidelines for the design of effective affirmative action programs is proposed. Finally, a call is made for a shift in the unit of policy analysis from a focus on group justice to relational justice.     

股东派生诉讼——公司自治与司法干预的平衡

股东派生诉讼是一种赋予股东为了公司的利益而提起损害赔偿诉讼权的制度安排,源于英美法系,为多国公司法效仿。新《公司法》在我国正式确立了股东派生诉讼。通过对股东派生诉讼法理基础的阐释,以及对其原告资格、前置程序、原告股东的权利限制三方面的制度设计,构筑股东派生诉讼——公司自治与司法干预平衡的理念,以完善我国股东派生诉讼制度。