设计未来：中国发展与知识产权

中国未来的发展,离不开知识产权事业的发展。知识产权战略是建设创新型国家的制度支撑。中国知识产权战略的实施,应着力于＂中国创造＂、＂中国创意＂、＂中国形象＂的发展目标,即实施专利战略、提高国家科技竞争力,实施版权战略、增强国家文化软实力,实施商标战略、提升国家品牌影响力。     

我国对外资银行金融监管体制的设计与创新

我国对外资银行主要实行市场准入、业务经营、资本金、税收方面的监管,但存在的问题不少,主要是监管目标的错位,导致不正当竞争,监管法律不完善等。问题的原因在于监管法治化水平不足、监管目标混乱、体制不合理。解决办法有两方面：一是宏观模式的选择,二是微观规制的创新     

试论采访中职责与伦理的冲突

记者在采访中经常面临职责与伦理“二律背反”的冲突。职责与伦理的涵义分歧，以及公众对记者的角色误读是形成冲突的两个主要原因。应对冲突，记者取舍的首要尺度是“公共利益”，制度设计也有助于化解冲突。     

论“阳光警察”测评指标设计

为了体现"阳光警察"的测评特点,突出"阳光"这一测评内容,把"阳光警察"的测评指标分为两个部分:"阳光品德"和"阳光警务"。"阳光品德"的测评指标参考国外对警察从业人员的品德要求,结合我国公安工作的特点,以及当前我国社会发展和家庭伦理关系的特点,立足于民警的生活、家庭、为人处事的态度、承担责任等几个观察点,来反映出民警是否具有健康的心理、良好的品德。"阳光警务"测评指标设计,根据各警种、各科室、各岗位的工作内容不同,为不同警种、岗位、科室设计不同的测评指标。     

浅议模拟银行实验项目设计与实施

根据实验内容及性质的不同,实验教学项目可分为验证性实验、模拟性实验、设计实验、综合性实验等类型。结合多年来从事模拟银行实验教学的经验,对实验教学项目设计与实施进行探讨。     

基于大公安专业的道路交通管理课程教学设计

《道路交通管理》课程是所有公安专业新增设的专业基础课之一,为了更好地完成课程的教学任务,实现其教学目标,必须开展该课程的教学设计研究,即在明确该课程的性质与定位的基础上,合理选择与设置课程的教学内容与模块,设计与选用相应的教学模式,建设与之教学思路相对应的教材。     

民法典设立先占取得制度之必要性与可能性透视

现行中国民事立法未明示规定先占取得制度,深刻影响着民法价值目标之合理性与体系建构之完整性。综观各 国立法,意识形态虽或相异,历史传统亦未必相同,但其于先占取得制度之构建方面却体现了一种共同之价值立 场并于法典中明示列出。以现行民事立法之价值选择与体系缺失两方面为切入点,分析先占取得制度阙如所产 生之诸种弊端,探明于未来民法典中增设先占取得制度之必然性及可能性,同时,以《中华人民共和国民法草案》 为蓝本对先占取得制度进行简要条文设计。     

Experimental design for acquiring relevant data to address the issue of comparing consecutively manufactured tools and firearms

The comparison of consecutively manufactured tools and firearms has provided much, but not all, of the basis for the profession of firearm and toolmark examination. The authors accept the fundamental soundness of this approach but appeal to the experimental community to close two minor gaps in the experimental procedure. We suggest that “blinding” and attention to appropriateness of other experimental conditions that would consolidate the foundations of our profession. We do not suggest that previous work is unsound.     

外观设计的许诺销售侵权研究

修订后的《专利法》对外观设计提供了许诺销售保护。本文在法学理论分析基础上探讨了许诺销售侵权构成，根据外观设计创造性成果地位论证了保护设计要点的必要性，为外观设计划定了适当的保护范围。并对两类许诺销售侵权提出了判断标准。     

Case law of the EPO Boards of Appeal in 2006

Legal context: The article reviews significant decisions handed down by theBoards of Appeal of the European Patent Office (EPO) in 2006,concentrating on decisions of the Enlarged Board and the Boardsof Appeal issued in 2006 and published or to be published inthe OJ EPO. Key points: The article discusses the application of Art. 24 EPC on exclusionand objection to members of the boards of appeal in the lightof the following decisions: G 1/05, T 281/03 and J 15/04; referralspending before the EBA on the subject of divisional applications(Art. 76 EPC and R. 25 EPC) and exclusion from patentabilityunder R. 23d(c) in conjunction with Art. 53a EPC; and decisionsof technical boards of appeal on exclusions from patentability(Arts. 52 (2)(3) and (4) EPC), the requirement of industrialapplicability (Art. 57 EPC) and re-establishment of rights (Art.122 EPC). Practical significance: The article provides an overview of the 2006 case law of theboards of appeal which is particularly useful since most ofthe decisions discussed have not yet been published in the OJEPO. The author is critical of the recent case law on the applicationof Art. 24 EPC (exclusion and objection to members of the boardsof appeal) and reports on several decisions of particular legalinterest.