论吸食新型毒品的管制

近年来,我国新型毒品有取代传统毒品的趋势。政府对吸食新型毒品的管制可分为出现法律真空、以地方管制为主、调整和统一戒毒模式三个阶段,具有受管制的新型毒品种类不断扩大、吸食新型毒品的管制日趋严厉、寻求司法与社会、医疗体系间的紧密合作三个特点。当前吸食新型毒品管制存在的问题是：强制隔离戒毒放大了惩处威慑功能、社区戒毒与社区康复管理措施不配套、自愿戒毒增加了复吸重罚的可能性。应转变理念,坚持人文关怀精神;明确社区戒毒定位,制定配套措施;鼓励自愿戒毒,减少管制成本。     

DEALERS,THIEVES, AND THE COMMON DETERMINANTS OF DRUG AND NONDRUG ILLEGAL EARNINGS*

Drug crime often is viewed as distinctive from other types of crime, meriting greater or lesser punishment. In view of this special status, this article asks whether and how illegal earnings attainment differs between drug sales and other forms of economic crime. We estimate monthly illegal earnings with fixed‐effects models, based on data from the National Supported Work Demonstration Project and the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Although drug sales clearly differ from other types of income‐generating crime, we find few differences in their determinants. For example, the use of cocaine or heroin increases illegal earnings from both drug and nondrug crimes, indicating some degree of fungibility in the sources of illegal income. More generally, the same set of factors—particularly legal and illegal opportunities and embeddedness in criminal and conventional networks—predicts both drug earnings and nondrug illegal earnings.     

制售伪劣商品犯罪之死刑究问

制售伪劣商品犯罪毕竞属于非暴力犯罪,不应过分凸显死刑在防治这类犯罪过程中的功能与作用。可以通过司法或立法举措剥离两种制售伪劣商品犯罪的死刑,使原本符合其死刑适用条件之情形转以相关危害公共安全犯罪来论处,从而在避免造成社会震荡之前提下,架空甚至即行废止其死刑。     

娱乐场所涉毒案件侦查方略

娱乐场所已经成为侦查机关查缉涉毒案件的重要场所。娱乐场所涉毒案件具有以聚众吸毒为主、以吸食新型毒品为主的特点。侦查机关在查缉娱乐场所涉毒案件时需要对贩卖毒品、吸食毒品等违法犯罪行为有针对性的采取相应的侦查措施,做到深挖毒品情报、打击毒品犯罪,遏制娱乐场所涉毒案件的滋生。     

Toxicology and Circumstances of Death of Homicide Victims in New South Wales, Australia 1996–2005

Abstract:  To determine the prevalence and circumstances of psychoactive substances amongst homicide victims, 485 consecutive cases autopsied at the NSW Department of Forensic Medicine (1/1/1996–12/31/2005) were analyzed. Substances were detected in 62.6% of cases, and illicit drugs in 32.8%. Alcohol, cannabis, opioids, and psychostimulants were most commonly detected. Alcohol and cannabis were both more prevalent amongst males. Mean ages were significantly younger for decedents who tested positive for a substance and for an illicit drug. Cases where death resulted from a physical altercation were more likely to have had alcohol and cannabis present. Illicit drugs were prominent amongst firearms deaths. The proportion of alcohol positive cases increased from 25.0% on Monday to 49.4% for Saturdays/Sundays. Alcohol was more common in incidents in the 0001–0600 h and 1800–2400 h periods. Psychoactive substances appear to substantially increase the risk of homicide, although there are important differences between drug classes in the circumstances of such incidents.     

试论引诱、教唆、欺骗他人吸毒罪

引诱、教唆、欺骗他人吸毒罪是一个在司法实践中适用率较低的罪名,对于该罪名,系统的研究较少,目前该罪名的主要争议点也就在于引诱、教唆、欺骗的对象是否必须具备认识能力。本罪与刑法总论规定的教唆犯罪的区别也是一个重点。此外,本罪的既遂标准也是人们认定上的难点。     

容留他人吸毒罪相关问题解析

在我国的司法实践中,毒品案件不断攀升,为能准确把握容留他人吸毒罪相关难点,可从该罪的犯罪构成、容留对象、场所、共犯、证据采信等方面予以全面分析,进而为实际判定厘清思路。     

窝藏毒品罪论要

窝藏毒品罪为毒品犯罪分子隐匿直接罪证,给揭露、查缉毒品犯罪制造障碍。我国刑法理论界与实务部门已对其开展了较为全面、系统的研究。然而,由于刑事立法对窝藏毒品罪的罪状建构相对简略,加之与贩卖毒品罪等常见毒品犯罪相比,窝藏毒品罪发案率低、典型判例少导致研究深度不足,这些都极易引发司法实践中特别是在办理新类型案件时定罪量刑结果的混淆与失衡。     

我国毒驾规制的行政法反思

毒驾问题是继醉驾问题后又一个公共话题。在未经由行政法规制而将毒驾直接入刑的做法是与现代刑法谦抑主义相悖的,基于此,我国毒驾规制采用行政规制手段,并体现在事先性驾驶禁止的法规范之中。这种"以权利换管理"的规制模式直接违反我国《禁毒法》的相应规定,且对毒驾问题采用行政事先审查办法予以解决,这不符合行政许可的一般法理,也不符合实践的发展需要。因此,毒驾规制的重心应当实现从行政事先强制性禁止向事后的行政严惩转变。