奥运与人性化治安检查──以娱乐场所为例

2008年奥运会的召开将影响娱乐场所人员结构、经营内容和经营方式,同时,娱乐场所的安全也直接影响着奥运安全.人文奥运要求公安机关在奥运期间对娱乐场所的治安检查更加人性化,一是对治安检查主体进行人性化配置,在奥运期间增加实质见警度、降低形式见警度;二是治安检查的频度和深度应当体现人性化,在奥运之前应组织全面、细致的治安检查以保障奥运安全,在奥运期间应适当增加检查频度,以维护娱乐场所安全和秩序;三是治安检查方式应当体现人性化,检查时应保护娱乐场所正常经营活动和秩序不受干扰和破坏、慎用集中清查行动.     

软警力的三重维度：警民关系、警察形象、警政管理

在警力的性质和资源发生了重大变化、对软警力的需求日益增大的时代背景下，应将如何提升软警力作为一个重要课题加以研究，重点从密切警民关系、改善警察形象、提高警政管理水平三个层面实施软警力开发战略，以解决严峻的社会治安形势与警力不足的尖锐矛盾。     

死刑复核程序：一个仍未终结的问题——以死刑审判权与核准权的分设为视角

死刑核准权归位于最高人民法院,这个本不应当出现的问题被解决后,死刑复核程序对拥有死刑复核权法院所裁判的死刑案件应否进行复核以及如何复核仍是一个需要亟待解决的问题。死刑复核程序作为“审判权”与“核准权”分设的特别程序始终未放逐这一立法信念,并以此为进路来设计死刑复核程序,以免死刑核准权被“审判权”架空影响死刑案件的质量。     

以科学发展观为指导保障孤残儿童的基本权益

孤儿是社会上最弱小、最困难的群体,生活在社会的最低层。他们生存权益得不到保障,更别谈其他的权益。应以科学发展观为指导,切实的保障孤残儿童的社会生活权益,以促进社会的和谐发展。     

腐败产生的经济伦理探源

从经济伦理的角度看，资源的稀缺性使得国家公职人员的权力增值，客观上为腐败的产生提供了滋生土壤；公平竞争规则与观念的异化是公职人员以权谋私的主观原因；作为他律的法律制度存在“空洞”，也会为腐败的产生提供了一定机会。     

宪政视野下的《刑事诉讼法·总则》

通过重构《刑事诉讼法·总则》,可以将其分为三部分,涉及权力分配问题、权力主体从事刑事诉讼行为时可能受到的限制、诉讼主体可以凭借的工具。第一部分是在宪政视野下的分析,其得出了一个值得注意的结论,中国刑事诉讼程序现代性因素非常多,权力分配的基本框架已经确立;第二部分,涉及对权力主体的各种限制本身可以增加司法机关判决的可接受性,可以提高司法权威;第三部分,分析了刑事程序参与者可以凭借的各种工具。在此基础上,进一步揭示出其暗含的一些瑕疵、甚至缺陷,如不赋予法官独立权,仅仅赋予法院作为整体的独立权。     

Research on the Difficult Questions Concerning the Judicial Determination of the Joint Crimes of Abduction of and Trafficking in Women or Children

Joint crimes of abduction of and trafficking in women or children are quite common and frequent in judicial practice. Fetching or sending, as well as transferring, of a woman or a child is, in essence, a kind of accessory behavior. Therefore, a person who commits such behaviors shall be punished as an accomplice, except, provided that there are certain judicial interpretations, being punished as a principal criminal in accordance with the law. A person who, for the purpose of buying the victim, instigates or helps others to abduct and traffic in a woman or a child shall be punished with the severer crime in accordance with the principles of implicated offences; a person who, in the process of committing the joint crime of abduction of and trafficking in a woman or a child, transforms his/her intention and buys the abducted woman or child shall be punished in accordance with the principles of inclusive offences. A person, who conducts the role of a broker in the process of buying and selling a woman or a child, shall be punished as an accessory in accordance with the principles of joint crimes. In addition, a person, who is a practioner in a particular industry, jointly, together with the buyer or seller, commits the crime of abduction of and trafficking in women or children shall be punished with a certain crime or combinedly punished with for several crimes in accordance with the specific circumstances.     

Violence,Law, and Politics: Hannah Arendt and Robert M. Cover in Comparative Perspective

Despite many significant points of intersection between his work and that of Hannah Arendt, the legal scholar Robert Cover largely declined to engage her perspective, which posed major challenges to his own. While scholars seeking to rethink Cover's legacy in order to develop a jurisprudence of violence have criticized Cover's acquiescence to the Hobbesian model of the sovereign state, they have similarly ignored Arendt's critique of the Hobbesian model and her attempts to build an alternative to it. This article examines central issues of convergence and divergence between Arendt's and Cover's approaches to law, politics, and violence with the aim to redress this neglect of Arendt's perspective. It begins by focusing on their interpretations of the role and significance of the courtroom trial. It then compares their analysis of the character, effects, and implications of domination as a type of organized power and as a means of conceptualizing punishment, before it concentrates on their instrumental conception of violence, the issue of justification, and its relationship to power. The article concludes by arguing that Arendt's approach, which situates an analysis of law and violence within a broader critique of modernity, provides a more trenchant critical framework for examining the rise of the carceral state than does Cover's.     

浅析教师权力转型的依据

在信息时代,教师权力受到了社会发展的挑战,教师权力现状不容乐观。教师权力转型存在社会实践基础,而西方权力理论为教师权力转型提供了理论依据,其中的＂软权力＂应该成为教师权力转型的主要依据。     

供述自愿性的权力保障模式

在我国，通过权利保障维护供述自愿性的理论构想并未透过现行刑事诉讼法全面体现。在供述自愿性的权利保障模式之外，还存在通过外部权力制衡审讯权力，从而间接维护供述自由的权力保障模式。以侦讯的“基本有效性”为外部限度，供述自愿性的权力保障模式应具备如下特征：审讯时间方面，审讯只能在白天进行，且不能持续太长时间，两次审讯之间应有保障受审人饮食和睡眠的必要时间；审讯空间和审讯主体方面，以“平行式”空间布局为基础，配之以独立、尽责的场所管理者；审讯工具方面，应配置自动化的或由审讯场所管理者独立操作的审讯记录、监控设施。新刑诉法和警务机制改革不同程度地体现了权力保障模式的基本内容，但单一的权力保障模式不足以解决强迫性审讯的所有问题，保障供述自愿性的理想模式应当是权利保障机制与权力制衡机制的有机结合。