论醉酒人犯罪的刑事责任

醉酒分为生理醉酒、复杂性醉酒和病理性醉酒三大类。其中 ,只有生理醉酒的人为完全责任能力之人。原因中的自由行为是 (生理 )醉酒人犯罪负刑事责任根据的有力学说。行为人对醉酒的不同心态 ,也是考察生理醉酒中行为人醉酒后犯罪的刑事责任时 ,需要考虑的重要因素。     

培养高素质的驾驶员是驾校的神圣职责

确保道路交通安全是一项系统工程,人、车、路三大要素均对道路交通安全产生重大影响,而驾驶员的因素居于首位,是起决定性作用的因素。文章仅分析驾驶员的因素对道路交通安全的影响,以及从何处人手提高驾驶员的素质,遏制交通事故的发生。     

The Rise of China: The Sustained Development of the World System or the End of It? *

It has been a controversial issue in the past thirty-odd years in academic circles at home and abroad whether China’s economic rise as a unique development model sustains and supplements the world system or brings an end to it. This article makes an analysis of the basic features of the three historical stages of the world system established 500 years ago from the perspective of the relationship between the world system and the rise and fall of countries. The analysis finds that the stages of mercantilism (1500-1750/1800), liberal economy (1800/1850-1914/1945) and mixed economy (1945-2030) were mainly based respectively on “geographical discovery” and “colonialism,” “industrial revolution” and “free trade,” and “economic globalization” and “system innovation.” For the above-mentioned reasons, “geographical discovery,” “international trade and finance,” “science and technology” and “international institutions and mechanisms” are the four fundamental driving forces that the world system has depended on for its existence for 500 years. The world system provided a context for the rise and fall of each individual country in the past 500 years, while the economic success China has achieved in the past three decades mainly benefits from its constant integration into this world system still in existence today. Therefore, the challenge to China in its future development will come, to a great extent, from the world system and its impact on China’s domestic politics, economy and social structure.     

旅途性精神病的社会危害及其防范

旅途性精神病有特定的发病因素、独特的病症表现和作案特点 ,大多可造成严重的后果。这一病症是可以预防的。一旦发生 ,要快速反应 ,采取有效措施控制局面 ,急救、转送伤员和患者 ,确保旅客生命财产的安全和铁路运输秩序。     

对危险驾驶罪的法定刑设置的反思

危险驾驶罪与以危险方法危害公共安全罪、交通肇事罪共同构成维护公共交通安全的刑网体系,但是在法定刑设置上,对危险驾驶罪判处拘役并处罚金与上述两罪并不协调,也存在漏洞;罚金和拘役功能相同,并处罚金不能实现特殊预防,应增加1年以下有期徒刑和轻微危险驾驶肇事行为的刑罚配置,同时就危险驾驶的结果加重犯单独作出规定,以便与相关条文相协调。     

危险驾驶罪疑难问题再探讨

危险驾驶罪实施对于减少和控制醉酒驾驶等危险驾驶犯罪发挥了重要作用,但是,由于本罪的规定存在不足并缺少相应的司法解释,导致司法实践中出现了不少问题。为解决这些问题,本文将从四个方面进行论述,第一部分危险驾驶罪的概述,第二部分着重探讨危险驾驶的内涵,第三部分重点论述醉酒驾驶的认定,第四部分针对本罪行为类型不完善提出相应的完善建议。     

危险驾驶罪之醉酒驾驶的立法完善

《刑法修正案（八）》明确将危险驾驶入罪。危险驾驶罪包括＂追逐竞驶＂和＂醉酒驾驶＂两种行为方式。危险驾驶案件多为醉酒驾驶。实践中,其规定存在着不足。应当扩大醉酒驾驶交通工具的范围、增加情节的限制,完善对危险驾驶罪之醉酒驾驶的刑罚处罚,规范与醉酒驾驶行为相关的机制。     

论危险驾驶罪——兼析《刑法修正案（八）》对危险驾驶罪规定之不足

《刑法修正案（八）》把醉酒驾车、高速追逐竞驶（包括飙车）等危险驾驶行为入罪,已引起社会各界的广泛关注与争论。本文论述了新增危险驾驶罪的必要性、概念与构成特征及其与相关犯罪的区别,旨在为刑法修正提供参考,为司法实践提供一定的理论依据。     

天水市民营经济发展壮大的内在动力与外部环境研究

增强民营经济的内在动力，消除外部环境的障碍，使民营经济加快发展，已成为一个亟待解决的问题。     

论危险驾驶罪的行为构成

危险驾驶罪包括两种行为:在道路上醉酒驾驶机动车和驾驶机动车追逐竞驶。醉驾是抽象危险犯,只要实施醉酒驾驶行为,立法就推定危险状态已经存在,彰显的是行为无价值。我国刑法的醉驾归属于形式犯,而非实质犯。在道路上驾驶机动车追逐竞驶,情节恶劣的,是具体的危险犯,突出的是结果无价值。