BEYOND POLITICS AND POSITIONS: A CALL FOR COLLABORATION BETWEEN FAMILY COURT AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROFESSIONALS

The domestic violence advocacy and family court communities have each grown dramatically over the last three decades. Although these professional communities share many values in common, they often find themselves at odds with one another on a host of issues. This article examines the practical, political, definitional, and ideological differences between the two communities and calls for them to join forces and collaborate on behalf of children and families.     

试论网络舆论监督与司法公正的关系

伴随着科技进步与社会主义法治文明的发展,我国的各类舆论媒体对社会问题的关注也越来越执著,尤其是对司法审判的透视与监督。而新兴的网络在此"浪潮"中发挥着不可替代的作用,向世人宣示着自我独有的功效。然而,也不乏一些负面作用,给司法审判造成了不应有的影响和压力,所以如何权衡二者的价值,是摆在我们面前的重要课题。     

试述影响我国司法正义的障碍及构想

正义是人类社会的普遍追求，正义是法律价值中的重要内容，正义只有通过法律才能实现。司法正义是保障法律正义得以实现的手段、方式和途径。我国随着法治建设的不断发展，开始关注司法正义。文章结合我国司法实践，分析目前存在的影响司法正义充分实现的障碍；提出具体的建议和构想，期待我国司法正义的早日实现，为我国积极构建社会主义和谐社会的目标而努力。     

物权的正当性解说

在人类思想史上,先后有多种学说从不同角度和不同层面揭示了物权正当性的法哲学基础。但是若要全面地理解物权正当性的内涵,应从权利本质的角度考察作为主体的人对特定物的自求利益是如何经由国家的价值判断而获得排他性的支配权。该价值判断的基础就在于生产关系的形态及人权保障的需求。     

刑事追赃与善意取得的冲突与重构

法律和司法解释在对善意取得是否能阻断刑事追赃存在不同观点和意见,追赃依据不一致直接导致司法工作者在实际工作中无所适从。现代意义上的法治国家主要标志就是规范公权、限制公权、保障私权、倡导私权,在立法的方向上,把善意取得制度纳入刑事追赃的规范体系是大势所趋。     

善待能动司法——从法社会学和法经济学角度

能动司法与司法能动具有本质的差别,能动司法更加侧重司法的艺术性和对当下社会司法需求的回应。几千年的人治文化及中国现代都市与较落后的农村社会构成的二元社会,造成的公民整体法律意识提高的速度异常缓慢的现状以及不够完善的法律体系,迫切需要法院在解决纠纷方面付出极大的作为,而不是仅仅满足于坐堂审案。这为能动司法提供了存在的基础和发展的空间,并使能动司法具有一定的法社会学和法经济学意义。能动司法应以司法公正为核心,以法律规制为原则,以适度有序为方法论,以利益衡量为正当选择,以审判方法和审判作风为重点。同时法院当前的能动司法适宜以中西部和欠发达地区为主要区域,并围绕司法审判这一中心工作展开。能动司法的实践涵盖刑事、民商、行政三大审判和执行工作,并随国家和当地政策大局的变化而丰富其内涵。     

中国被害人保护制度建立的展望——以恢复性司法为视角

建立中国被害人保护制度,应注意做到,对于被害人的保护应当体系化,全面、同时开展,而不是小修小补,应当借鉴英美尤其是日本和台湾的经验,制定国家补偿制度和被害人援助制度,同时,应当修改刑事诉讼法,增加被害人在刑事诉讼中的权利。     

Relationship of the Family Environment to Children's Involvement in Bully/Victim Problems at School

Previous studies regarding the relationship of the family environment to children's involvement in bully/victim problems at school primarily focused on children's perceptions of family dimensions. No studies were known using data from multiple reporters within 1 family (parents and children) on family characteristics of bully/victim problems. The aim of this study was to investigate differences between families of victims, bullies, bully/victims, and noninvolved children on family functioning, child-rearing practices, and problem-solving strategies in hypothetical conflict situations and perception differences between children and their parents on those dimensions. The findings revealed important perception differences between children and their parents, with parents holding up a more positive picture of their family. Important differences between families of bullies, victims, and bully/victims were documented looking at the family functioning and parent–child interactions from the perspective of the children. In contrast, almost no differences between the groups were observed if parents' reports were considered. Discussion leads to suggestions for further antibullying interventions at the school.     

论社区养老服务发展特征

社区养老服务已成为解决我国养老问题的必然选择。探讨市场经济条件下其特征,无论对社区养老服务的理论研究,还是对社区养老服务的实践指导,都有着十分重要的意义。     

Wanted and Unwanted Sexual Experiences and Family Dysfunction During Adolescence

The goal of this study was to examine the relationship between family dysfunction and wanted, unwanted, and illegal sexual experiences that occurred during childhood and adolescence. Three hundred fifty-three subjects from a sexual abuse clinic, a family practice clinic, and a family planning clinic anonymously completed a survey on childhood sexual experiences and physical violence, family substance abuse, violence toward others, and family quality. Overall, 50% had had unwanted (USE) and wanted sexual experiences (WSE) before they turned 18. Subjects in the sexual abuse clinic had the highest percentage (90%) of unwanted or illegal sexual experiences, followed by the family planning subjects (40%) and the family practice subjects (30%). Both USE and WSE were related to family dysfunction scores, even when they were controlled for demographic influences. Family dysfunction scores were highest for those who reported USE and legal WSE and were lowest for those who reported no USE or WSE.