国有垄断性企业收入分配问题的思考

由于体制性因素，政策性因素等原因，导致国有垄断性企业员工收入水平普遍较高，企业内部收入分配平均主义比较突出。为了规范国有垄断性企业的收入分配秩序，体现公平与效率的原则，必须引入竞争机制，降低垄断水平；清理整顿工资外收入，规范收入来源；降低人工成本，逐步拉开企业内分配差距。实徒工资总额管理，健全工资水平管理体制，加大宏观调控力度，理顺收入分配秩序。     

船舶拍卖实务问题研究

船舶拍卖是海事审判中独具特色的法律制度。虽然《海诉法》对此作出了系列规定 ,但在船舶拍卖实务中仍然存在诸多问题。文章根据船舶拍卖的性质对拍卖公告期限、债权登记、确权诉讼、拍卖价款的受偿等问题从实务方面进行了探讨     

From Poisson to the present: Applying operations research to problems of crime and justice

In the 1830s Siméon-Denis Poisson developed the distribution that bears his name, basing it on the binomial distribution. He used it to show how the inherent variance in jury decisions affected the inferences that could be made about the probability of conviction in French courts. In recent years there have been a number of examples where researchers have either ignored or forgotten this inherent variance, and how operations research, in particular mathematical modeling, can be used to incorporate this variance in analyses. These are described in this paper, as well as other contributions made by operations research to the study of crime and criminal justice.     

公平分配的实现过程

公平分配的实现状况直接关系到和谐社会建设的成败，正确地认识公平分配的实现过程至关重要，现阶段，解决公平问题的重点在初次分配，而不是二次、三次分配，实现公平是一个渐进的过程，要分阶段按层面进行，不能一刀切，大体可以分为三个阶段、两个层面。由于涉及问题众多，涉及部门无数，每一个问题、每一个部门有不同特点，所以解决分配问题要形式多样，没有固定的模式。     

我国转轨经济中垄断性行业收入分配制度改革研究

我国改革开放以来,对电力、电信、铁路等垄断性行业进行了一定程度的改革并取得了一定成效。但是,上述行业垄断经营的基本格局并未根本改变,而垄断行业与其它行业的收入差距却在不断扩大。这类垄断性行业往往具有自然垄断的性质,即便是在引入竞争后仍有较高的垄断程度,而且上述行业普遍受到政府规制,规制政策直接影响到行业的经济效率以及收入分配问题。本文在综述国内外已有相关文献的基础上提出了将规制经济学分析框架以及"X非效率"理论引入到该问题的研究当中,构建了我国垄断性行业垄断形成的经济学模型以及"X非效率"的测量模型,提出了我国转轨经济中垄断性行业收入分配制度改革研究的整体研究思路。     

缩小收入差距 促进社会和谐

收入差距的不合理扩大,会引发严重的社会问题和政治问题,直接影响社会和谐。为此必须采取相应的对策,使收入差距保持在一个可以接受的范围,以避免不必要的社会矛盾激化。     

浅论行政自由裁量权

行政自由裁量权是法律赋予行政机关的一项至关重要的权力。适度的自由裁量可以弥补法律规定的不足,体现法的灵活性。依法正确行使自由裁量权有利于提高执法效率。自由裁量权的行使要从立法、司法监督、执法等环节进行控制,保护相对人的合法权益。     

论有中国特色的人才资源管理体系

我国目前的人才资源管理仍存在诸多机制问题,如何建立有中国特色的人才资源管理体系具有重大的理论与现实意义。文章从评价体系的完善,“人本”企业文化理念的树立,契约化、社会化人力资源管理模式的建立以及创新人才培养机制、实现由人才资源向人才资本的转化等5个方面作了理论探讨。     

巨灾损失呼唤个人破产制度

汶川地震,凸显了破产法缺失个人破产制度。个人破产法应尽早进入立法视野。应借鉴企业破产制度中的破产财产制度、破产和解制度,建立个人破产的相关制度,并制定相应的监督制度,更好地发挥破产的价值功能以维护债权人的合法利益,给债务人重生的机会。     

An assessment of Botswana's electoral management body to deliver fair elections

Botswana has regularly held general elections since 1965 and in October 2014 held her 11th general election. All these elections have so far been won by the ruling party. The regularity of elections in Botswana has persuaded some observers to present Botswana as an exemplar of democracy and good governance in Africa. This perception is reinforced by the formal existence of an electoral management body, the Independent Electoral Commission (IEC), whose mandate is to ensure that elections are conducted efficiently, properly, freely and fairly. Although the Constitution enjoins the IEC to ensure that elections are conducted fairly, this article reveals that, in effect, the IEC has neither the authority nor the power to level the electoral playing field, and ensure that elections are also fair, in addition to being conducted efficiently, properly and freely. This inability by Botswana's electoral management body to ensure that elections are conducted fairly emanates from the narrow legal and political framework within which the IEC operates, and exposes the weaknesses of Botswana's much vaunted democracy.