构建我国域名与商标权纠纷解决机制

域名作为网络的"门牌号",有着自己的属性。注册一个域名,可以用它来发布信息、刊登广告、交友聊天等等,这个小小的域名蕴含着无限的潜能。域名作为新的媒介,与传统的知识产权领域的商标、商号等发生冲突,特别是域名权益与商标权之间纠纷成为域名纠纷的主要问题。目前统一域名纠纷解决政策(UDRP),是国际域名纠纷解决机制最权威的依据。我国没有制定如同UDRP那样详尽的关于域名与商标权纠纷的解决规定。     

环境利益的民事立法保护与救济

民法能够有效地发挥其维护主体民事权益的功能,就是因为其拥有一整套完备的民事权益体系,并针对民事权益进行全面的保护与救济。现如今,处在环境问题以及其带来危机的大背景之下,应将"环境利益"纳入民事立法之中,促使主体利用自然环境的权利得到民事法律的保护与救济。通过确认环境物权、引入环境人格权,以及对《侵权责任法》相关内容的完善,进一步加强环境利益在民事立法中的保护与救济。     

对驰名商标特殊保护潜在弊端的规制问题初探

驰名商标是企业知识产权竞争实力的标准之一,原因在于国家赋予驰名商标特殊的庇佑,使得企业将驰名商标看作经济市场地位和利益的有力保障。驰名商标内在的反淡化保护理论是其发挥特殊性的理论根源。在理论中对驰名商标保护的过度"浓化"使得驰名商标在认定方、认定标准等环节上存在着一定的弊端。尤其在实践中,驰名商标企业会出现侵犯他人在先权利以及将"驰名商标"字样加于外包装等手段获取更大利益。立法应从权衡商标权利人、消费者、竞争者三方利益出发,对驰名商标的授予标准进行量化规定,以有利于提高驰名商标企业的综合水平。这不仅是对消费者负责,同时会提高企业竞争力,防止不正当竞争的出现,以期实现我国驰名商标制度的合理运行。     

论债之对外效力的表现

债之效力区分为对内效力与对外效力。对外效力是对债之关系当事人之外的第三人所产生的效力。一般情况下债权仅在当事人之间发生拘束力,但为了保障债权的实现,在特殊情况下法律对合同相对性予以突破。债的对外效力的表现主要包括:债权的保全,债权的物权化,第三人侵害债权,涉他合同。     

农民工社会保障权的实现

如何实现农民工的社会保障权是我国一个重要的现实问题.本文以农民工群体的特征和社会保障权的基本现状为基础,分析了农民工社会保障权实现的重要意义和存在的主要障碍,指出了农民工社会保障权实现的途径和措施.     

Do party leadership contests forecast British general elections?

When assessing election forecasts, two important criteria emerge: their accuracy (precision) and lead time (distance to event). Curiously, in both 2010 and 2015 the most accurate forecasts came from models having the longest lead time—albeit at most 12 months. Can we increase the lead time further, supposing we tolerate a small decrease in accuracy? Here, we develop a model with a lead time of more than 3 years. Our Party Leadership Model relies on the votes of MPs when selecting their party leader. We assess the forecasting quality of our model with both leave-one-out cross-validation and a before-the-fact forecast of the 2019 general election. Compared to both simple forecasting methods and other scientific forecasts, our model emerges as a leading contender. This result suggests that election forecasting may benefit from developing models with longer lead times, and that party leaders may influence election outcomes more than is usually thought.     

Particular Rights and Absolute Wrongs: Giorgio Agamben on Life and Politics

Over the past decade, as human rights discourses have increasingly served to legitimize state militarism, a growing number of thinkers have sought to engage critically with the human rights project and its anthropological foundations. Amongst these thinkers, Giorgio Agamben’s account of rights is possibly the most damning: human rights declarations, he argues, are biopolitical mechanisms that serve to inscribe life within the order of the nation state, and provide an earthly foundation for a sovereign power that is taking on a form redolent of the concentration camp. In this paper, I will examine Agamben’s account of human rights declarations, which he sees as central to the modern collapse of the distinction between life and politics that had typified classical politics. I will then turn to the critique of Agamben offered by Jacques Ranciere, who suggests that Agamben’s rejection of rights discourses is consequent to his adoption of Hannah Arendt’s belief that, in order to establish a realm of freedom, the political realm must be premised on the expulsion of natural life. In contrast to Ranciere, I will argue that far from sharing the position of those thinkers, like Arendt, who seek to respond to the modern erosion of the borders between politics and life by resurrecting earlier forms of separation, Agamben sees the collapse of this border as the condition of possibility of a new, non-juridical politics.

主观与客观之间——知识产权“信息说”的重新审视

作为知识产权对象的信息不应是信息论意义上的信息,而应是控制论意义上的信息,即具有"同型结构+意义"双重结构。这有其法学上的规范意义。具备"源于人、有价值、法定性"条件的信息即可成为知识产权的对象,其特点有主客观双重属性、与载体的可分离性、可复制性、可传递性、可共享性等。知识产权的诸多困境即源于信息的主客观双重属性。     

基本权利在特类民事行为领域的适用

"特类民事行为"即指与国家公权力有关联的民事行为。它主要适用于给付行政领域,可以分为两种类型:其一,国家以私法主体身份所为的民事行为,具体可以分解为3种形式。该类行为必须受到基本权利的限制,但这仅仅指向于其中的行政私法行为。而且,基本权利对该种行为的适用与对传统高权行政行为的适用不同,前者具有明显的层次性。其二,私人在传统公共行政领域所为的私法行为。该行为属于"公共行政民营化"中的第3种形式,即"实质民营化",主要集中在给付行政领域。该类行为要受到基本权利的约束。而且,应该受到法律保留原则的约束,但是,法律保留原则在该领域的适用和在秩序行政领域的适用具有本质的不同。     

以违法与责任为支柱构建犯罪论体系

对犯罪实体的认识不能仅停留在"客观"与"主观"两个概念上;犯罪论体系应当以价值或目的作为出发点,从而体现评价;以违法与责任为支柱构建犯罪论体系,具有充分根据与内在合理性。