试论我国的精神损害赔偿法

社会文明程度的提高和人们法制观念的增强,人们越发注重对个人权利的保护,尤其是精神利益的自我保护意识呈越来越强化之势.本文拟对精神损害赔偿的涵义、适用范围以及精神损害赔偿在法律实践中面临的有关问题进行探讨,由此提出健全和完善我国精神损害赔偿之立法对策.     

货币市场基金法律问题研究

目前我国尚不存在货币市场基金 ,但是未来出现货币市场基金是必然的 ,对未来出现的货币市场基金前瞻性的法律问题进行探讨 ,以期未来的货币市场基金健康发展     

论中国台湾地区的行政执行制度及理论

我国台湾地区的行政执行制度及理论对探讨中国内地制定行政强制执行法具有借鉴意义。笔者介绍了台湾行政执行的概念、特征、种类 ,探讨了其法理基础及原则 ,分析了其修订后的“行政执行法”在形式和内容上的变化 ,并就公法上金钱给付义务的执行 ,公法上行为、不行为义务的执行 ,行政上的即时强制 ,行政执行行为的性质及法律救济等问题进行了详细探讨 ,对台湾行政执行制度及理论的特色与不足也作了分析。     

The Scope of Serious Crime and Preventive Justice

I first offer an account of serious crime that goes beyond victimizing crimes committed by individuals against other individuals. This approach extends the well-known framework offered by von Hirsch and Jareborg to include crimes undermining welfare-producing institutions. I then consider how the seriousness of crime justifies preventive measures, including the criminalization of acts preparatory to the commission of serious crime. I shall defend preventive measures, including highly intrusive ones, for the most serious crimes, such as terrorism in the form of mass killing, but I shall take issue with very expansive conceptions of serious crime that include what are intuitively much less serious offenses than terrorism or murder. In England and Wales, the Serious Crime Act (2007) lists relevant types of serious crime in its Schedule 1. This and other pieces of serious crime legislation in the UK are discussed critically.     

中日合作共同推进东亚共同体

东亚共同体是东亚合作的必然趋势,是东亚各国的长期目标。然而,在小泉政府期间,因日本不与中国讨论东亚共同体,在双边自由贸易方面孤立中国,中日关系冷淡,中日两国一直未能共同推进东亚共同体。日本民主党实现政权轮替后,表示了与中国合作共同推进东亚共同体的新姿态,受到了中国的欢迎,出现了中日合作共同推进东亚共同体的新局面。以此为契机,中日两国应该根据推进东亚共同体的前提、原则与途径,加强合作,共同推进东亚共同体。     

The Silence of the Sirens

Risk is a projection of a specific temporality performed by the observer. However, this projection is doomed to impossibility because of the prohibiting problems of time, causality, subjectivity and relativity of risk. The observer is left only with a castrated projection that defies the role of science as a pedestal for the projection and institutes negation as its driving force. This projection is materialised within the Law in the form of the Precautionary Principle. Risk evokes undesired dualisms, especially the one between Idealism and Operationalism. The essay attempts to bring the two together by extrapolating the hard appearance of the legal system as seen through Luhmann’s autopoiesis and the need for critical openness of a contextualised environmental law. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

法医学鉴定实践中的伦理考量

法医学鉴定的对象是人及与人相关材料,因此在法医学检案实践中需要考虑伦理问题。基于法医学鉴定中的公平正义、尊重、真相告知三大基本原则,进一步衍生出法医学检案实践活动的具体伦理要求,即法医学鉴定的称职性、对鉴定涉及案件及其当事人伦理考虑、如何处理案件检材。然而当前法医学鉴定却存在部分法医鉴定人不称职、重技术轻程序、鉴定机构选择出现争议、利益输送与利益冲突等问题。笔者针对以上问题提出相应对策,并重点讨论三大矛盾,保证法医学鉴定称职性。     

论法院裁定仲裁协议效力的原则

本文论述了人民法院在裁定仲裁协议时 ,如何正确贯彻公正原则 ;坚持依法原则 ;体现强制原则 ;实行纠错原则等。以充分维护当事人的合法权益。     

The Judge Ses No Facts：on the Facts,Evidence, and Fact Identification under the Principle of Evidentiary Adjudication

Evidentiary adjudication is one of the important signs of progress of litigation and judicial civilization. There are three key concepts under the principles of evidentiary adjudication: facts, evidence and fact identification. They form a kind of logic relationship among proposition, the argument and conclusion. As a logical starting point of judicial proof, the case facts have legal determinacy which is different from the facts in philosophical sense, and also different from the fact that as a foundation for the judicial judgment. As the basis of the facts, the evidence emphasizes more the relevance and legitimacy in form. As a logical end point of judicial proof, fact identification is a rational, rigorous proof, but the case facts happened in the past, the fact-finder can only see the evidence, and can only use the evidence to find the facts, which determines the uncertainty of fact identification.