我国药物滥用文献计量学研究

目的:了解我国近10a来药物滥用研究的文献状况。方法:采用"物质相关性障碍"为主题词,对《中国生物医学文献数据库》1997年-2006年收录的药物滥用文章进行检索和分析。根据《中国学术期刊综合引证报告》(2007版)提供的各项统计指标,对药物滥用领域的核心期刊进行分析。结果:(1)我国药物滥用研究论文的发表呈逐年上升趋势;(2)文献的著者以广东、北京和山东发文量最多,占50.4%;(3)大学的相关研究机构和附属医院发文量较多,占30%,其中北京大学发表最多;(4)药物滥用领域的研究中9.8%是基金资助的,而且基金资助数量也逐年增多;(5)载文量最多的期刊是《中国药物依赖性杂志》,其次是《中国药物滥用防治杂志》。结论:《中国药物依赖性杂志》和《中国药物滥用防治杂志》是药物依赖研究领域最受关注的期刊,具有较高的影响力和学术地位。     

《德意志意识形态》中“交往理论”的深层透析及其现实意义

"交往理论"是《德意志意识形态》中一个非常重要的理论。马克思和恩格斯在科学实践观的基础上对交往进行了系统阐述,并首次创建了马克思主义的交往理论。今天,我们重温"交往理论",对全面建设小康社会,构建社会主义和谐社会以及构建和谐世界,都具有重大的理论意义和实践意义。     

产业集群风险理论研究述评

在简要评述国内外产业集群风险理论的基础上,指出现有集群风险理论研究上的缺陷。基于演化经济学的分析框架,从技术与制度变迁两个层面入手构建了产业集群自稔性风险成因的扩展模型,旨在为深入探求集群风险的成因与化解途径提供更多支持。     

逮捕措施适用的实证分析.

逮捕是刑事诉讼中最严厉的强制措施。逮捕措施的适用，既要保证准确有力地打击犯罪，又要保障人权。当前逮捕措施在适用中一些行之有效的做法得到落实，逮捕条件掌握得较好，质量较高。同时也存在着公安机关撤销和变更逮捕措施等问题。应当进一步完善检察机关对公安机关撤销、变更逮捕措施的监督制度和检察机关决定逮捕的制度以及逮捕的执行制度。 关键词：逮捕措施　适用　实证分析     

刑事诉讼中司法审查机制的实证分析——以俄罗斯和我国台湾地区的司法改革为范例

法制变革国家和地区的司法审查实践的经验和教训有助于我们理性地看待建立我国刑事诉讼中的司法审查制度。我国台湾地区羁押权、搜查权收归"法院"的成功实践表明,司法审查机制能够成为保护被追诉者乃至普通公民免受国家权力无理侵犯的甲胄;俄罗斯建立法院对逮捕、羁押的司法审查机制的艰难实践却证明,司法审查制度最终得以实现需要突破重重难关,尤其是改变旧的权力格局,确立新的权力结构。我国刑事诉讼中确立并落实司法审查机制,同样需要完善错案追究、国家赔偿制度,实现司法独立、树立司法权威。     

中国高校教师聘任制政策文本研究

本文通过内容分析的研究方法，对依据“可获得性”原则搜集到的47所高等学校教师聘任制度样本，从13个方面比较了具体内容的异同，对我国目前各地高校教师聘任制度改革的整体状况进行了统计分析和说明。研究发现，各地高校在政策制定上都与国家相关规定的基本精神保持了高度一致，相互之间不存在显著差异，这些都充分反映了我国高等教育高度行政化、高度集权化的特点。现阶段，我国高校教师聘任制度建设已初步形成体系，并发挥了一定作用，但是仍然存在各个方面的具体问题，需要进一步深化和落实聘任制度改革。     

基于中国银行业市场集中度分析外资银行进入的影响

本文基于我国具有代表性的14家国内银行1991-2004年的时间序列数据,对外资银行进入对我国银行市场集中度的影响进行了定量实证研究。结果表明:外资银行进入对我国银行业人民币存贷款集中度、外汇存贷款集中度的影响并不显著,但是从整体来看,外资银行资产份额比外资银行数目对我国银行业集中度的影响要大。最后,文章提出了实证结论和相应的对策建议。     

On the value of formal assessment of uncertainty in regulatory analysis

The US Office of Management and Budget introduced in 2003 a new requirement for the treatment of uncertainty in Regulatory Impact Analyses (RIAs) of proposed regulations, requiring agencies to carry out a formal quantitative uncertainty assessment regarding a regulation’s benefits and costs if either is expected to reach $1 billion annually. Despite previous use in other contexts, such formal assessments of uncertainty have rarely been employed in RIAs or other regulatory analyses. We describe how formal quantitative assessments of uncertainty – in particular, Monte Carlo analyses – can be conducted, we examine the challenges and limitations of such analyses in the context of RIAs, and we assess how the resulting information can affect the evaluation of regulations. For illustrative purposes, we compare Monte Carlo analysis with methods typically used in RIAs to evaluate uncertainty in the context of economic analyses carried out for the US Environmental Protection Agency’s Nonroad Diesel Rule, which became effective in 2004.     

The economic significance of “insignificant” rules

We know relatively little about the economic effects of “insignificant” rules because they are not typically analyzed. Yet, these rules could be cumulatively important. We provide an economic analysis of one proposed rule to control hazardous air pollutants, which is not considered to be economically significant. This rule is of particular interest because it is one of the first in a long series of rules that Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will consider for limiting hazardous air pollutant emissions. Our analysis suggests that the proposed controls that EPA has considered are not likely to pass a benefit–cost test. We recommend that an agency base its decision to allocate additional resources to benefit–cost analysis on the expected value of the improved information. In addition, agencies should consider applying a rule of thumb that would specify a threshold level of risk reduction that needs to be achieved before some kinds of regulation are considered.     

The changing face of ‘Drivers of Change’

In 2001 the UK Government's Department for International Development (DFID) launched a new way of conducting political economy analysis, called ‘Drivers of Change’ (DoC). DoC is now well known amongst international development practitioners and professionals. This article provides an introduction to DoC, explaining what it is, where DoC analysis has taken place and which organisations have been involved. It also explores the history and background to DoC, outlines its effect on other bi and multi‐lateral donors and shows how the approach has evolved over the last 5 years. The final section of the article analyses some of the current limitations in the way DoC analysis is used by DFID and predicts how the approach may develop in the future. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.