论商事立法传统与商事立法模式

每个国家的商事立法模式很大程度上是由该国的商事立法传统决定的。通过对四个典型国家及地区的商事立法传统和商事立法模式的分析,充分证明了这一点。因此,通过我国商事立法传统的分析有助于合适地选择我国的商事立法模式。通过我国商事立法传统及世界商事立法现状的分析,以《商事通则》为基础,各商事单行法为主体的商事立法模式应是我国商事立法模式的理想选择。     

古代中国判例传统:成因及启示——案例指导制度的另一观察视角

中国古代有着悠久的判例传统,其成因有经验哲学、贵族精神以及实用性。中国古代判例传统对我国当今案例指导制度建设的启示有二:一是确立成文法为主判例为辅的二元法源形式;二是加强对法官自由裁量权的规制,具体包括加强法官裁判过程的程序控制和提高法官的人文素养。     

二十一世纪财税法学人的历史使命

在当今时代,财税法是国家与纳税人双方利益的调节器,和谐社会建设的关键是需要建设一个科学、理性的财税制度,以及和谐的国家与纳税人的关系,那么作为21世纪的财税法学人应当承担起历史赋予我们的伟大历史使命,应当对历史、对国家、对社会负责,实现财税法学人所应当完成的历史责任和社会责任。     

重刑考

重刑,作为一种制度和理念,在中国刑法史上长期存在。历史上有许多伟大的思想家、法学家发表过不少的宏篇伟论,对重刑高唱赞歌,力证重刑对治国安邦之不可或缺;肉刑的存废之争,更延续了上千年。重刑的价值取向在全社会有相当普遍的共识,不仅统治者对其情有独钟,一般善良百姓也津津乐道,直至现在,重刑思想在中国仍有深厚的社会、文化基础。     

欧美宪法社会学比较透视

宪法社会学是关于宪法的社会学研究,是宪法学与社会学交叉融合的产物,旨在发现人类政治生活中的真实规则。在欧洲和北美,宪法社会学已经形成了多元化的学术传统。其中,德国的宪法社会学侧重于从政治与历史的角度切入,偏好史论结合,思辨色彩浓厚。法国的宪法社会学具有客观的、旁观者的叙事风格。英国的宪法社会学打上了判例法或不成文宪法的痕迹,致力于素描一部活生生的宪法,仿佛人类学家的调查报告。美国虽然承袭了英国的判例法制度,但美国的宪法社会学透出强烈的现实主义意味,宪法背后的经济关系、利益格局得到了凸显。梳理欧美宪法社会学的学术传统,比较欧美各国宪法社会学的不同旨趣,有助于为当代中国宪法社会学的稳步发展提供理论与方法论上的启示。     

Voices

正"The way that the Chinese conceive of themselves in the world is very dif erent from the Western tradition I imagine that most people think that as China rises it will be a bit like the U.S.in some shape or form     

An Issue of Grave Concern

正China’s buried historic relics are under severe threat of theft After one and a half days of presentations and voting by a 21-judge jury,China’s top 10 archaeological discoveries in 2013 were announced by the Institute of Archaeology under the Chinese Academy of     

Reforms Will Guide China简

正THE third Plenary Session of the 18th Communist Party of China(CPC)Central Committee approved a plan that will comprehensively deepen China’s reforms.Few plans in the history of New China have been so powerful or wideranging.It ranks alongside the historic report of the third Plenary Session of the 11th CPC Central Committee of 1978,which marked the onset of the"reform and opening-up"policy.     

Tactics,traditions and opportunities: British and French crop‐trashing actions in comparative perspective

This article compares the tactic of trashing genetically modified crops in activist campaigns in Britain and France. In Britain, most crop trashing was carried out covertly, while in France most activists undertook open, public actions. In seeking an explanation for this, the article shows that the analysis of political opportunities, dominant in comparative studies of social movements, can only take us so far. While it helps explain the occurrence of direct action, it is much less useful in explaining the tactical differences between each country. It is argued that a fuller explanation requires an understanding of how action was shaped by different activist traditions. In France, action was staged as a demonstration of serious, responsible, collective Republican citizenship; in the United Kingdom, activists combined a sceptical view of legality developing from anarchist individualism with an explicitly non‐threatening, playful, ethos. The article concludes that a focus on activist traditions can provide an effective bridge between structural and cultural approaches to understanding the determinants of social movement action.     

穿行于理想和现实之间的平衡--从法律文化的视角解读"法律效果和社会效果的统一"

"法律效果与社会效果的统一"这一司法政策的出台是伴随着中国司法改革的深入而日渐成熟的,从法律文化的视角对该项司法政策进行评述,就会发现,该政策既有存在的深厚文化土壤,又具有存在的客观必要性,是在理想与现实中寻求平衡的司法选择.