人质危机谈判的阶段性策略

人质危机谈判通常分为谈判初始阶段，实质性谈判阶段和结束谈判阶段。在谈判的不同阶段，劫持者的心理状态有所不同，谈判使用的策略与方法也有所差异。谈判初始阶段的主要策略是稳定情绪，建立互信，会同攻击单位共同制订运送、接收、投降和攻击方案。实质性谈判阶段的重，最是策略性地处理要求与期限。谈判结束阶段应做好和平结束与武力结束两种可能的准备。谈判人员要根据各阶段形势发展，采用相应的有效谈判策略，有序地处理人质危机。     

论人质自救

人质自救涉及人身安全,必须审慎。在确保安全的前提下,应当允许人质自救。但须遵循主动性、有效性、妥协性、适当性、策略性等基本原则;所采取的自救措施必须是万无一失的,因而自救行动的实施要有充分的准备,并达成行动的突然性。人质自救不仅对保障人质人身安全有着十分重要的意义,而且为警方尽快捕获劫持者提供了有利条件。因此,应增强公民自我保护的自救理念。     

关于警务危机干预理论与实践探讨

警务危机干预理论和技术是公安机关做好群众工作行之有效的方法之一，它可以大大缓解矛盾激化而可能引发的恶性事件、案件的发生，也可以提高公众心理危机认知水平，预防心理障碍和疾病的发生，以积极健康的心态适应社会环境，化解因社会矛盾而引发的心理困惑．减少不必要的对抗和冲突．引导并创建祥和文明的社会，是新时期探讨警务工作机制的又一重要工作方式。     

人质谈判中的风险评估和方案设计

人质谈判中的风险评估就是指当警方赶到人质劫持现场后,在展开谈判工作和设计谈判方案前,指挥者对此次劫持事件做一个基本的风险评估。只有在判明危机事件情况的基础上,指挥员才能对案件的发展情况做到心中有数,从而把握人质危机处置进程的主动权,使谈判取得成效。结合我国目前人质事件类型,进行人质谈判中的风险评估,以确定谈判时所采取的应对策略,从而设计科学、动态的谈判方案,切实有效地提高谈判的效果。     

Groups Work for Women: Gender and Group Identity in Social Dilemmas

Behavior in social-dilemma (mixed-motive) situations has been of great interest to economists, psychologists, and negotiation scholars. In this study, we used a threshold social-dilemma game to examine factors that have not yet been investigated and that may have an impact on behavior in these settings: gender and group identity. We found that, for women, interacting with members of a naturally occurring group increased coordination and efficiency, while for men, interacting with members of a naturally occurring group decreased coordination and efficiency. Psychological literature on gender differences and group interdependence explains these differences. We conclude by discussing the implications of these results for gender differences in negotiation behavior.     

论劫持人质案件谈判中的沟通

劫持人质案件谈判最主要的技巧即在于谈判员与劫持者之间的沟通过程,然而,沟通的能力并不是与生俱来的,而是一项必须不断地学习及练习的技术。谈判失败的主要原因往往是谈判员在处置劫持人质案件过程中不能有效应对各种因素和状况,不会采用适当的沟通技巧。谈判人员很有必要掌握各种克服与劫持者沟通障碍的办法及在不同的状况下的沟通方法与技巧。     

论心理学在反劫制暴行动中的重要作用

劫持人质是一种严重的犯罪活动，它直接涉及人民的生命安全、社会安定等重大问题。反劫持谈判是防止劫持事态扩大、快速平稳局面的重要方法之一，也是目前世界各国政府与警方高度关注的课题之一。能获得反劫制暴战术谈判成功的关键取决于临场谈判人员对行为人的心理进行快速、准确的分析，现场情绪的控制及谈判技巧。因此，认识心理学在反劫制暴战术谈判中的重要性，提高和丰富当前警察队伍的心理学专业知识，改善其谈判手段，已迫在眉睫。     

To Flirt or Not to Flirt? Sexual Power at the Bargaining Table

We begin by exploring the lay belief that women can use flirtation to their advantage in professional contexts and contrast it with trained negotiators' negative views on flirtation. We then examine the impact of flirtation on negotiators' impression formation. We explore whether a flirtatious style aids women in the trade-off they often face between perceived likability and perceived competence. We discover both an upside and a downside to flirting at the bargaining table. Although flirtation appears to be positively related to women's likability, negotiators who flirted were judged to be less authentic than those who refrained from exercising their sexual power.     

MEDIATING JUDICIAL POLICY

Despite the widespread use of mediation to resolve public policy disputes, there is little written on the mediation of judicial rule disputes. A successful mediation of a dispute over proposed court rules to govern mediation of certain family law cases involving domestic violence concerns is reviewed. The authors conclude that the mediation provided (a) a confidential venue for disputing judges to respectfully disagree with one another, (b) an opportunity for collaborative problem solving, (c) an opportunity to reduce conflict among judicial colleagues. (d) a format for dialogue with other stakeholders, and (e) greater degree of influence with regard to the outcome of the dispute. Specific recommendations to encourage the effective use of judicial policy mediation are offered.