当前我国住房保障问题与对策研究

住房问题是现代城市社会问题之一。城市土地和住房供给的巨大需求，形成了住房供应的绝对短缺，极易导致住房价格极大高于中低收入家庭的支付能力，因而，如何有效的解决住房保障问题，无疑具有重要的理论意义和应用价值。本文在探讨当前住房保障问题政策困境的基础上，探讨相关对策，以期更好的解决住房保障的迫切难题。     

中国土地征收补偿标准研究 基于地方立法文本的分析

地方立法中的征收补偿条款在一定程度上决定着我国土地征收补偿标准的实际状况。从对地方立法文本中关于征收补偿标准的立法权行使状况和内容构成的统计分析来看，我国征收补偿的立法层级很低，地方立法文本的补偿条款具有高度不确定性，年产值倍数法仍然是占主导地位的补偿模式，补偿倍数总体不高，政策性文件和立法存在冲突。我国今后应当对土地征收统一立法，确立按市场价值公平补偿的原则，构建合理的征收补偿权力制约机制，明确征收补偿标准的计算公式，对集体土地所有权人和用益物权人分别进行补偿。     

Measuring the Effectiveness of New Approaches to Housing Support Policy for Persons with Disabilities

Housing support policy for persons with disabilities who require access to 24‐hour formal or informal support is changing throughout Australia. This is consistent with international trends including: independent living in generic housing; facilitating choices about where and with whom people live; individualised home‐based support; and community integration. Are these trends leading to policies that are effective in the Australian context? This article presents a framework for analysing the effectiveness of new approaches to housing support using a rights perspective. The framework consists of four domains: client outcomes; administrative systems; service viability; and coordination between formal and informal carers. Applying the framework to six case studies found that they all aim to foster independence, while providing effective individualised, holistic housing support.     

自由的堡垒——在非法侵入住宅罪中探析住宅权的价值

每个人的家都是自己的一座城堡。住宅是公民私人生活最安全、最隐密、最独立的家园,住宅权是一项既包含财产权利．又包含人身权利的综合性权利。我国对非法侵入住宅罪的规定缺乏深入研究,应借鉴古今中外的相关规定和学说．揭示住宅权在刑法中应有的价值,从而使之能够得到更有力的保护。     

略论商品房预售之定金

在实践中对订立商品房买卖合同前所交付的款项的用语不同,对其性质的判断应依《合同法》第125条关于合同解释的规定探究当事人的真实意思来确定。认购书中的定金具有立约定金和违约定金的性质,因当事人的约定也可具有解约定金的性质,其责任应适用定金的规定。     

中国住宅产业发展走向分析

世纪之交知识经济的迅猛到来 ,对房地产业发展会产生积极的影响。加入 WTO后 ,在信息技术、信息革命的推动下 ,住宅产业在不断创新的发展战略指导下 ,会有一个较长期的持续发展 ;先进的科技成果在住宅开发中的应用 ,将使住宅的功能更加完善 ,多功能、综合性、智能化的住宅将会在本世纪初普及 ;住宅郊区化随着经济的发展必然会实现     

Resident-Owned,Informal Mobile Home Communities in Rural California: The Case of Rancho Don Antonio,Coachella Valley

California's farmworkers are among the lowest-paid wage earners in the state. They often live in crowded or substandard housing. The Polanco Bill—state legislation enacted in the early 1990s—aimed to increase the supply of housing for farmworkers by encouraging the development of employee housing on land zoned for agriculture. This article discusses the implementation and effects of the Polanco Bill in the agricultural area of the eastern Coachella Valley. It finds, somewhat unexpectedly, that groups of farmworkers, often family members, have used the bill to collaborate and develop small, resident-owned, informal mobile home communities, called polancos, and focuses on one such case. Although the article's key contribution is to identify the informal approach and its key attributes, it also discusses whether a new housing model based on the collectively owned polancos is possible.     

Why Is Homeownership Associated With Nonfinancial Benefits? A Path Analysis of Competing Mechanisms

Four mechanisms may underlie a homeownership effect: residential stability, perceived control, social identity, and financial interest. Path analysis of survey data collected from lower-income households suggests that the length of time lived in the dwelling and the participant's sense of control mediate the association of homeownership with civic engagement and health outcomes. The magnitude of this homeownership effect depends upon higher levels of home equity and increases after controlling for single-family detached housing. While much of the homeownership effect remains unexplained, the findings suggest that the nonfinancial benefits of owning a home are influenced by home equity and dwelling type yet are driven by residential stability and perceived control. These mechanisms could be leveraged to benefit renters.     

Citizenship agendas,urban governance and social housing in the Netherlands: an assemblage approach

This article combines recent conceptualizations of citizenship beyond the nation state with new perspectives on governance assemblages comprising both state and non-state actors. Focusing on Dutch social housing, this study explores how such governance assemblages produce agendas that attempt to shape citizenship. Employing an assemblage approach, this study first demonstrates how state and non-state actors amalgamate by providing a historical overview of the urban governance of social housing in the Netherlands. Second, taking account of the territory that the assemblage claims, it shows how underprivileged neighbourhoods become the spatial locus of these assemblages. Third, examining what this amalgam produces, the article shows how the assemblage imposes a citizenship agenda on the population of these neighbourhoods, distinguishing between ‘good’ and ‘bad’ citizens. Acknowledging that citizenship agendas are produced by a multifaceted amalgam of state and non-state actors, this article emphasizes the need for rigorous academic analysis of such governance assemblages.     

State,citizenship, and the urban poor

This paper examines the dynamic, moving relationship between three concepts – those of life, law, and exception. Following a brief exposition of these concepts, this paper provides an ethnography of struggles over housing waged by the urban poor in a squatter colony in Noida that adjoins the city of Delhi, India. I argue that each concept in this triad exerts force on the other and is the dynamic relation that creates the conditions of possibility for the emergence of claims over citizenship for the urban poor. In suggesting that citizenship is a claim rather than a status, which one either has or does not have, the article shows the precariousness as well as the promise for the poor of ‘belonging’ to a polity. Joining the discussion on the politics of life, the paper argues that the notion of life allows the mutual absorption of the natural and the social, and thus illuminates aspects of citizenship forged through the struggles waged by the poor for their needs. These are aspects of citizenship which remain obscure if we reduce democratic citizenship to the domain of rational deliberative processes alone.