人体搜毒犬训练程序和方法研究

缉毒犬作为一种能高度分辨气味的特殊工具，能有效、准确地搜查出隐蔽的毒品。人体搜毒犬的培养一般包括基本能力培养、搜索形式培养、建立毒品气味联系、复杂气味条件下搜索能力培养等四个方面内容，每个方面均有不同的训练内容、要求和方法以及注意事项。     

权利的张扬与追寻——2006年中国权利问题研究综述

2006年的中国权利研究,著述颇丰,学术研讨频率密集且范围广泛,呈现了多元化、立体化的趋势。人权研究生机勃勃,平等权是当下社会生活和权利研究中的一个关键词,农民、农民工等弱势群体的权利保护则是与平等权密切相关的热点问题。传统的权利研究继续深入,新兴权利的研究与日俱增,权利本位理论正在向现实论证扩展,有关权利的理论日益丰满。     

试论职务犯罪侦查人力资源配置

党的十七大明确提出了坚持以人为本,树立全面、协调、可持续的科学发展观。它的提出是对发展内涵、发展要义,发展本质的进一步深化认识与创新,对推动各项事业的健康发展具有重大的意义。本文试图以科学发展观为研究视角,从职务犯罪侦查人力资源优化配置的维度作为论证重点,以期构建权威、高效、公正的职务犯罪侦查机制。     

科学发展观与人权事业的全面发展

以人为本的科学发展观,提升了中国人权事业全面发展的新境界,深化了中国人权事业全面发展的新内涵,指明了中国人权事业全面发展的新思路.     

人权保障机制下警察盘查制度的重构

盘查是国家基于人民警察的职责和任务依法赋予人民警察的一项重要职权，对于警察在日常治安行政管理活动中及时预防、发现、打击违法犯罪有着积极的作用。由于盘查启动的随意性，运行的任意性，尤其是超范围行使盘查权和超时限行使盘查权，导致在警察盘查中有冲击公民人身权的危险。因此应当从盘查权的启动、运行、救济方面来合理规范盘查权的行使，以实现保障公民人权的终极目的。     

Proactive counter-terrorist strategies in conflict with human rights

Three standard governmental policy responses to terrorism have been identified: a military one, treating the fight against terrorism as a form of warfare; a police-based one, treating it simply as a form of criminal activity, to be detected and then defeated using (perhaps some modified version of) the criminal justice system; and a political one, viewing it as a form of armed rebellion to be resolved through negotiation and the political process. All three responses to terrorism may be evident in any particular instance.     

“亲亲相隐”与和谐社会的构建

"亲亲相隐"作为以人伦亲情为纽带的传统法律制度,对尊重人性与实现正义,以及保护人权与构建和谐社会有着十分重要的意义,应当在我国刑事立法中予以体现。本文在介绍"亲亲相隐"制度的历史沿革与国外立法例的基础上,分析了"亲亲相隐"制度在我国现行刑事立法中缺失的成因,论证了如何重新构建亲亲相隐制度,以期裨益于刑事立法与司法。     

What Role for Human Rights in Business?

The Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) were endorsed by the United Nations Human Rights Council in June 2011, following the six‐year mandate of the Special Representative to the Secretary General (SRSG) on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises. The SRSG developed a framework comprised of three pillars: (1) States have a duty to protect against human rights abuses committed by third parties, including business enterprises; (2) business enterprises have a responsibility to respect human rights; and (3) victims of business‐related human rights abuses need access to effective remedies. In particular, guiding principle (GP) 11 provides that business enterprises should respect human rights, that is, they should avoid infringing on the human rights of others and address adverse human rights impacts with which they are involved. This article considers the implications of the Guiding Principles' framework for business; the continuing role of conventional accountability mechanisms in providing access to remedy for victims under the third pillar of the framework; and developments in ‘hard law', with a particular focus on the approach by the UK, since the introduction of the UNGPs, before turning, briefly, to the future for business and human rights.     

Indian spies inside Pakistan: South Asian human intelligence across borders

This article examines India’s historical efforts to spy inside Pakistan from the mid-1960s to the early 1970s. It draws from memoirs of notable Indian spies who were jailed for espionage in Pakistan and spy ‘fiction’ written by former Indian intelligence and military officers who allege their writing is based on actual cases. The article highlights commonalities among Indian spies using the words of Indian officers to better understand human intelligence efforts inside Pakistan. It finds that Indian spies in these books have initially been Hindus or from multi-religious families, from the Indian-Pakistan border and have been poorly treated by the Indian government and its intelligence services.     

Bridging the Gap: The Relationship between INGO Activism and Human Rights Indicators

This article explores the tension between the production of “naming and shaming” reports as tools of activism by international nongovernmental organizations (INGOs) and the usage of these reports as cross-national indicators of human rights violations. Because INGOs are strategic actors, their reports are not a reflection of the “true” levels of abuse. Although existing scholarship has raised this issue in relation to bias in cross-national indicators, it has yet to explain the process by which NGOs produce reports. This article exploits subnational variation across domestic and international NGOs within India, showing how the divergence in their reports can be explained by these groups’ organizational structures, probability of success in their chosen issue areas, and target audiences. By explaining how human rights NGOs produce reports, this article concludes with suggestions to ensure that the biases prevalent in a single source of data do not drive the results of future scholarship.