论以人为本与以物为本的同一性

以人为本与以物为本具有三方面的同一性:其一,在本体论上以物为本是以人为本的基础,以人为本是以物为本的升华;在人类社会历史里人是主体,物是客体,互为条件,互相转化.其二,在价值论上人的价值与物的价值相互比较,相互依存;人和物的具体价值由人类历史发展过程具体环节的价值需要来确定;人的发展与物的发展互相促进.其三,在现实论上现实的个人是由个人的现实的物质生产劳动创造的,人与人的物质交往又造就了有社会性的现实的个人;而当今中国社会现实是中国处在社会主义初级阶段,只有全面协调以经济建设为中心的经济、社会、政治、文化和人的各方面关系,才能促进经济社会和人的全面发展;只有人与自然和谐相处,才能实现人与自然的可持续发展.     

文化人类学的族群认同与考古学文化的族属研究——汉末魏晋河套阴山地区北方民族遗存族属研究的个案思考

考古人类学的族属研究注重考古学文化问题,其关健在于理解考古资料和文献记载中人群集团的历史真实。应用"族群边界"的族群认同理论中的"情境族群"和"根基小族群"概念分析河套阴山地区北方民族遗存的族属问题,关注族群的构建过程,可以建立某种识别判断"根基小族群"性质遗存的操作模式。     

“未成年人前科消灭“的理论与实践探讨

建立"未成年人前科消灭"制度具有重要的理论和现实意义,它既符合法的正义价值,又有利于实现刑罚的目的,同时还有利于撕掉犯罪标签和完善我国现有的未成年人保护法律体系.但目前在我国实施还面临一些困境,即该制度与我国现行相关法律冲突,制定主体不适格,缺乏相应的法律支持和配套实施机构,极易导致司法腐败.因此,只有在充分的法律准备下才能在全国推广和实施.     

青少年犯罪社区矫正制度的现实解读

社区矫正制度是中国在少年司法制度上的一项大胆的探索,对其建立的现实依据以及运行情况进行总结,是建立与完善统一的青少年犯罪社区矫正制度的必要前提。     

Identity Orientation, Voice, and Judgments of Procedural Justice During Late Adolescence

This study focused on the relationship between voice and judgments of procedural justice in a sample of older adolescents and examined potential moderating and mediating influences of identity orientation (personal, social, and collective) and negative emotional response. Participants read 1 of 2 different family conflict scenarios (voice and no voice) asking them to imagine themselves in a disagreement with their parents over grades and financial support. In the voice condition, parents were described as making their decision after listening to the participant’s input. In the no voice condition, parents were described as making their decision without listening to the participant’s input. The adolescents then judged the fairness of the parental decisions and responded to questions concerning their identity orientation. Findings indicate that in addition to replicating the effect of voice in a novel context, the present investigation found moderating effects of personal identity orientation on procedural fairness judgments. Additionally, negative emotional response partially mediated the relationship between voice and global judgments of procedural fairness.Mark R. Fondacaro is an Associate Professor of Psychology and Associate Director of the Levin College of Law Center on Children and Families at the University of Florida. He received his Ph.D. in clinical psychology from Indiana University and his J.D. from Columbia University School of Law. His major research interests are ecological jurisprudence and the conceptualization and assessment of procedural justice in legal and extra-legal contexts including the family and the juvenile justice and health care systems.Eve M. Brank is an Assistant Professor of Criminology, Law & Society at the University of Florida. She received her Ph.D. in social psychology and her J.D. from the University of Nebraska, Lincoln. Her major research interests are parental responsibility laws and juvenile law issues.Jennifer Stuart is a graduate student in counseling psychology at the University of Florida. Her major research interests are adolescent development and delinquency prevention.Sara Villanueva-Abraham received her Ph.D. in developmental psychology from the University of Florida. Her major research interests are adolescent development and parent-child relationships.Jennifer Luescher is a Forensic Psychology Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Massachusetts, Boston. She received her Ph.D. in counseling psychology from the University of Florida. Her major research interests are in the areas of procedural justice, risk assessment and risk management, and mental health and juvenile justice policy.Penny S. McNatt is a Visiting Assistant Professor at the University of North Florida. She received her Ph.D. in social psychology from the University of Florida. Her major research interests are in the area of intergroup relations.     

Why We Punish in the Name of Justice: Just Desert versus Value Restoration and the Role of Social Identity

Two different notions of justice might motivate people to demand punishment of an offender. The offense could be seen as lowering the victim’s and community’s status/power position relative to the offender, requiring a degradation of the offender to restore a moral balance (just desert). Or, the offense could be seen as questioning community values, requiring a reaffirmation of those values through social consensus (value restoration). Two studies referring to tax evasion and social welfare fraud yielded supportive evidence. Just desert was related to traditional punishment, especially when participants did not identify with a relevant inclusive community (Australians). Value restoration was related to alternative (restorative) punishment, especially when community values were regarded as diverse and requiring consensualization. It tended to be related to traditional punishment when community values were regarded as clear and consensual.

寻求身份的认证:萨德本的规划

小说《押沙龙,押沙龙!》作为福克纳的“约克纳帕塔法世系”小说中的轴心之作,引起了诸多评论家的关注,国内对该小说大多进行主题研究而忽略文本分析。文章聚焦萨德本的规划,运用拉康的“镜象”理论和库勒的“镜子自我”理论,对其规划的形成、建立和毁灭进行了详尽的论述,指出萨德本规划的实质乃是寻求自我身份和社会地位。     

试论民事诉讼中的证明标准

我国民事诉讼法对于民事诉讼的证明标准没有明确规定,长期以来理论界一直有“客观真实”和“法律真实”两种证明标准之争,随着法学理论研究不断深入,人们从民事诉讼证明的相对性、“客观真实”标准的局限性、“法律真实”标准的可行性,重新认识,逐渐接受“法律真实”标准。     

刑如韭，剪复生－从现实、传统哲学、文化、人性层面解读刑讯逼供

刑讯逼供何以"刑如韭,剪复生",可以从其存在的现实状况,哲学基础、文化背景、人性特征方面分析,探究刑讯逼供的泛滥成灾之势.