系统、结构和经验--拉兹洛对系统认识论的探讨

拉兹洛的系统认识论对以往认识活动的说明方式进行了反思,并第一次采用现代系统分析、信息理论的基本概念与方法提出了人类各种不同性质的认识所具有的一般认识模式.本文试图对拉兹洛的系统认识论作一介评,以展示认识论研究的这一新领域,阐述它所揭示的问题及其理论意义.     

家长认知与意愿：流动人口子女融入城市公立学校视角

流动人口的子女能否真正进入城市公立学校并融入其中，与对“身为流动人口的家长”的认识、态度和意愿是分开的。本次调查发现，“身为流动人口的家长”送他们的子女进入城市公立学校的愿望十分强烈，但对相关政策的了解不多，他们普遍认为子女进入城市公立学校不太容易，公立学校收费超过自己的经济承受能力。文章最后提出了加大资源投入、加强政策宣传、放宽入学条件三条建议。     

论单位过失犯罪

在市场经济逐步确立的过程中 ,单位犯罪行为激增 ,其中也包括单位过失犯罪行为 ,这决定了单位过失犯罪的客观可能性和刑法价值性。单位意志深层次的因素是违法性意识 ,违法性意识说应作为肯定论的理论基础。以单位过失犯罪的主体特征、主观特征、行为特征来界定单位过失犯罪范围 ,一定范围内的单位过失行为应予犯罪化。单位过失犯罪的刑事责任由单罚制过渡到双罚制更为合理     

关于行政违法内涵界定及其危害性分析

本文在对即有的行政违法概念进行比较分析的基础上,对行政违法的内涵重新进行了界定,同时对行政违法的构成及其社会危害进行了深入剖析。     

中国文化在实践与认识关系问题上的特点

处理实践与认识的关系是一切人类社会的共同之处,古今中外,概莫能外。在处理实践与认识的关系问题上,中国文化的特色比较明显。其优点是因为它们拥有部分真理,其缺点是因为它们有片面性。     

品牌延伸心理模型及其消费者分析研究

品牌延伸心理模型构建是当今国际上品牌理论研究的重要内容,也是前沿性课题之一.20世纪80年代后期至90年代品牌延伸心理模型主要有情感态度模型、属性联想模型,进入21世纪以来,运用认知心理学观点与研究方法,从消费者情感与认知相互影响过程分析,构建品牌延伸理论模型,对制定切实可行的品牌营销策略具有重要的现实意义.     

儿童权威认知与警察询问研究综述

国外最近的心理学研究成果表明 ,警察的权威身份会增加儿童证人、被害人在接受警察询问中被误导的可能。对这一方面的研究在国内相当缺乏 ,需要对国外理论界在这一方面的研究成果进行简单的概括 ,并在此基础上结合我们的实际情况提出研究方向。     

Social Justice in Our Minds,Homes, and Society: The Nature,Causes, and Consequences of Implicit Bias

Social injustice is disruptive both personally and collectively, and the ordinariness of implicit prejudice plays a role in this process. In this report, I discuss the correspondence between implicit and explicit biases, and factors that moderate their association. In addition, I differentiate between declarative and procedural definitions of implicit bias, which have implications for their nonconscious nature. To underscore their conceptual distinction, I also present evidence that points to different origins for implicit and explicit biases. Finally, actions for confronting implicit bias are prescribed.     

对间接故意及疏忽大意过失罪过心理的探讨

在多年的刑法教学实践中,笔者发现许多学生在学习刑法犯罪主观方面理论时,对直接故意和过于自信的过失的内容掌握得较好,但在运用间接故意和疏忽大意的过失理论分析案例时常常出错,深究其原因,还是对这两方面的罪过心理理解得不够透彻的缘故。本文试从认识与意志两方面因素深刻探究这两种罪过心理的发生机制,以期供广大学员及教师同行们参考。     

Between punishment and discipline: comparing strategies to control unauthorized immigration in the United States

Immigration scholars have noted the rise of a distinctive discourse concerning immigrants in the United States. The ‘immigrant threat’ discourse is said to portray immigrants as an existential threat to the country and contributes to highly restrictive enforcement policies. Through a close examination of national political debates concerning comprehensive immigration reform (CIR) (2005–2007), the paper shows that most politicians involved in this debate (from liberal Democrats to conservative Republicans) agreed with the basic assumptions of this general discourse. But the paper also identifies important variants on the ‘threat’ discourse and associated strategies. Hardline conservatives stressed that the essential ‘illegalness’ of immigrants posed a threat to the country. Protecting the nation state from this threat required policies to totally banish all undocumented immigrants from the country, irrespective of their ‘good’ conduct or exceptional circumstances. Moderate and liberal reform advocates agreed with the idea that undocumented immigrants posed a threat to the country. However, they believed that banishment alone could not address the threat. Instead they advocated a strategy of risk management whereby the population would be differentiated according to levels of risk (high to low priority) and policies of inclusion and exclusion would be adjusted accordingly. This would allow the government to incorporate low risk/priority immigrants while freeing government resources to target the ‘truly threatening’ groups (i.e., criminals, delinquents, homeless, repeat unauthorized entries, etc.). Thus, while both sides conceded that undocumented immigrants were a threat to the country, they developed important variants on the discourse and contrasting policy solutions to exert control over the population.