邓小平理论研究的几个历史阶段

党的十一届三中全会以来 ,邓小平生平及邓小平理论研究一直是国内外学者关注的热点。 2 0多年来 ,邓小平理论研究大致经历了五个阶段 ,取得了丰硕的研究成果。这些研究成果为推进中国的社会主义现代化进程和促进邓小平理论的形成和发展 ,为帮助人们准确把握邓小平理论的科学体系和精神实质作出了重要的贡献。     

简议领导理论的发展轨迹及其发展方向

领导理论的发展在半个多世纪来取得了巨大的成就.但仍然在领导者的选拔中未能取得一致的结论。对领导理论 发展的各阶段评述,可得出领导理论的发展应将素质和情景进行匹配研究,最终得到基于情景的完整的领导理论。     

传统发展理念的内在矛盾

传统发展理念由于其包含一系列内在矛盾而使自身陷入困境并导致了发展危机。这主要表现在:发展至上主义的迷醉及其对生存家园的遗忘;技术乐观主义的虚妄及其对有限理性的消失;人类中心主义的偏执及其对天人关系的僭越;消费享乐主义的滥觞及其对生态伦理的缺席。在揭示传统发展理念深层矛盾困境的同时,昭示当代人应自觉走出其设定的内部陷阱,从而为建构通向未来科学的发展观扫清理念上的障碍。     

嬗变的理性和理性的嬗变──主题报告:刑罚进化论·评论·答辩

主题报告人提出了从进化论角度考察刑罚演变的这样一种学术观点,即刑罚进化论。该论的提出,意在首先明确三个问题：一是刑罚进化的形态,二是刑罚进化的规律,三是刑罚进化的原因。“西南法学论坛”的一些学者就该报告的研究方法及术语使用等问题进行了评论,也提出了一些不同见解,报告人作了简明的答辩。     

建立我国显性存款保险制度析论

随着我国金融改革工作的不断推进,现有金融体制的完善亟待加强。我国目前隐性存款保险制度已明显不符合市场经济条件下金融稳定和发展的要求。借鉴主要发达国家完善的存款保险制度,建立我国显性存款保险制度,对于提高公众对金融机构的信心,形成有效的市场退出机制,减轻政府负担,降低政府维护金融市场秩序的成本,具有重要意义。我国存款保险制度的建立,必然要从我国实际情况出发,协调各方利益,设计有利于我国市场发展的显性存款保险制度。     

The social semiotic of homophone phrase substitution in Chinese netizen discourse

The paper addresses an ingenious way by which Chinese netizens manage to reach their intended audiences under the radar of censors surveying the Internet in China. One specifically Chinese social use of language in this respect is the option to express criticism by using inoffensive characters that share the same or similar pronunciation with politically sensitive phrasing. We identify this type of expression as homophone phrase substitution (HPS). The device has been part of Chinese since ancient times under the name political metaphor. We address the main constraints at work in HPS, especially the role of voice (prosodic contour) that guides the construction of two divergent kinds of aboutness. Leaving aside its critical function in contemporary society, by contrasting HPS with verbal irony, metaphor, and Australian rhyming slang, and by drawing on semiologie and semiotics, indirect speech acts and implicit deixis, we suggest that this linguistic option throws new light on the semantic/pragmatic distinction.     

驳泛叙述者论

很多当代叙事学家都认为所有的虚构叙事都有一个不同于作者的虚构叙述者。这一观点被称为“泛叙述者论”。本文以充分的理由驳斥了这一观点,同时指出那些看似支持这一观点的重要论据是根本站不住脚的。在简要介绍小说理论的基础上,文章认为,无论从理论还是从实践角度来说,都没有必要为每个虚构叙事假定一个虚构叙述者。     

Student/trainee-professional implicit theories of paedophilia

Abstract

This research investigates student/trainee-professional implicit theories of paedophilia and their explanations for the current crisis of paedophilia. The research methodology is based on a previous research design (Sternberg, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607–627, 1985), and consists of two interrelated studies. Study 1 (n=60) develops scales for student/trainee-professional implicit theories of paedophilia and Study 2 (n=188) uses these scales in conjunction with other scales to define the student/trainee-professional implicit theories of paedophilia and to measure the potential explanations for the current crisis of paedophilia. The findings indicate that student/trainee-professional implicit theories of paedophilic personalities (pathology, abusive and mentally disordered old offender) and behaviours (devious, child focused, cognitive distortions, secretive, child lovers, sexual abusers, socially inept and grooming) seem to reflect both previous research and expert opinion. These tentative findings suggest that student/trainee-professionals' implicit theories of paedophilia, and as such the current crisis of paedophilia in modern society, seem to have developed in part from the transfer of expert knowledge (explicit theories), the impact of the media, and social constructionalism; and not from the student/trainee-professionals' individual personality and coping traits.     

Portfolio Allocation or Policy Horizons? Determinants of Coalition Formation in Danish Local Government

It is widely assumed that policy considerations are important when parties form government coalitions. But if this is so, and if coalitions are negotiated in multi-dimensional policy spaces with no majority parties, then a rapid turn-over of coalitions should be observed, cf. the chaos theorem. However, we rarely witness this. Here we analyse two of the most prominent theories that address this puzzle: Laver and Shepsle's portfolio allocation model; and Warwick's policy horizon hypothesis. We do not analyse the ‘usual suspects’ (i.e. national government formations in Europe), but present a new empirical testing ground: Danish local governments. We rely on Laver and Shepsle's Winset programme to identify ‘strong parties’ in the portfolio allocation model but develop a new measure of Warwick's policy horizons that better deals with problems of multi-dimensionality. In a conditional logit analysis of survey data from 3000 local councillors, we find support for the policy horizons model, but not for the portfolio allocation model.