突发事件信息传播的法律规制

我国突发事件的信息传播呈现鲜明的政府主导性,引致信息流通不畅和肆意传播的弊端,没有起到通过信息传播提高公众参与度,促进危机解决的危机信息传播目的,甚至延长或加重了危机的过程。应从立法上予以规制,明确严格规范政府的信息发布行为,建立完善媒体、公众参与信息传播的制度,保障个人信息权利。     

中国人股骨的性别鉴定

目的建立中国人股骨性别判定的方程。方法测量来自全国14省区的已知生前确切性别180例（男150例,女30例）个体的双侧股骨21项指标。使用统计软件SPSS13．0对获得的股骨测量项目数据,进行同一性别双侧间及不同性别同侧间的t检验,然后采用Fisher判别分析法和Bayes逐步判别分析法,建立股骨性别判定的系列判别函数。结果股骨单一测量指标中男性判别率最高指标为股骨上髁宽,为94．0％,女性判别率最高指标为股骨头周与股骨颈垂直径,为93．3％,总判别方程的判别率为男性98．0％,女性93．3％。结论本研究提供的判别方程式判别准确率较高,适用于中国人股骨的性别判定。     

私人拍摄交通违章的证据法分析

私人拍摄交通违章能否作为司法机关认定案件事实的证据。我国法律并未明文规定。在实践中。部分省市出台政策。鼓励市民对违章车辆进行拍照并以拍摄的照片向公安机关举报。然而这些措施却带来诸多问题。私人拍摄交通违章照片能否作为证据使用受取证主体、证据的形式、证据的收集程序和提取方法等制约。私人拍摄交通违章照片对认定交通违章案件具有现实意义。     

利益不是权利——从我国《宪法》第51条说起

利益不是权利而只是权利的要素之一,他人可能维护你的利益,但不能代替你享有权利。我国《宪法》第51条关于“利益”与“权利”的区分对宪法理论和宪政实践都有着极为重要的意义。公民权利不可能与国家的、社会的、集体的“权利”而只可能与其“利益”发生冲突,权利只存在于平行主体之间（如国家与国家之间、集体与集体之间、集体与集体外的个人之间、个人与个人之间）或非平行关系中的“弱势”一方（如国家与集体关系中的集体、集体与个人关系中的个人、国家与个人关系中的个人）。公民权利也并非都会对国家的、社会的、集体的“利益”构成威胁,有些权利不可能损害其利益,如信仰、思想、良心自由;与其利益冲突的主要是个人权利中具有明显利益成分的权利,如财产权、社会保障权等;国家的、社会的、集体的利益一般不能成为剥夺人身权（如生命权、健康权）的理由。国家的、社会的、集体的利益亦有别于“公共利益”。     

现代国际法的人本化发展趋势

Humanization is not only a new concept and value-oriented, but also an ever-increasing positive phenomena in international law. Contemporary international law has been contributing to the establishment and improvement of global peace and development order for the co-existence among States on the one hand, and making endeavors to the formation and maintenance of humanizing order, which is both “individual-oriented” and “humankind-oriented”. Such a humanizing phenomenon undoubtedly represents the advanced trend of international law, enriches its contents, updates some of its classic branches and impacts on the basic principle of reciprocity on which it is created and developed. However, the humanization of international law could not have taken shape without common accords among States by means of either treaties or customary rules; and without cooperation among States, the humanistic value of international law can never become true no matter how sublime it is. Zeng Lingliang, Ph.D, is presently a dean and professor in Faculty of Law of the University of Macau, a Cheung Kong awardee and Jean Monnet Chair of European Union Law in Wuhan University, and one of the first three individuals nominated by the Chinese government on the list of panelists in the WTO. Prof. Zeng has a lot of articles published on the WTO issues, EU law and international law, and his representative monographs, for instance, European Communities and Modern International Law (Wuhan University Press, 1992) and its revised edition European Union and Modern International Law (Zhiyi Press, 1994), Law of World Trade Organization (Wuhan University Press, 1996), International Law and China in the Early 21st Century (Wuhan University Press, 2005) and Essentials of EU Law—In the new perspective of the treaty on a Constitution for Europe (Wuhan University Press, 2007).     

行政许可与个人自由

在资源配置效益之外从个人自由的角度论证行政许可的本质 ,运用分析法学的方法解析许可和行政许可的法律意义 ,则行政许可就是通过行政程序创设个人自由或财产性权利的构成性事实。行政许可权的合理性与正当限度即在于个人自由与公共利益的平衡。公共利益概念存在不确定性和“羊皮化”倾向 ,而对治理的实质理性的追求是不可靠的 ,应该注重程序制度的建设和程序权利的维护。     

权利冲突中的少数主义原则

权利冲突问题一直以来都是法学研究的一个热点,同时也是一个难点,而多数人权利与少数人权利的冲突问题,则可以说是难点中的难点:因为处理不好它有可能导致民主制度的颠覆或多数人的暴政等问题.考虑到法学首先是一种实践性学科,因而对这个在实践中经常遇见的问题进行理论上的分析并提出解决之道就是法学的当有之责--而"少数主义原则"正是对这一问题的可能答案.     

THE ROLE OF TURNING POINTS IN ESTABLISHING BASELINE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PEOPLE IN DEVELOPMENTAL AND LIFE‐COURSE CRIMINOLOGY

Turning points, between‐person differences, and within‐person changes have all been linked to desistance from crime. Nevertheless, the means through which between‐person differences are frequently captured in life‐course criminology makes them intertwined with, and perhaps confounded by, turning points in life. We propose that a new way of capturing the between‐person effect—the baseline between‐person difference—could benefit theoretically informed tests of developmental and life‐course issues in criminology. Because they occur at one time point immediately preceding a turning point in life, we demonstrate that baseline between‐person differences establish meaningful theoretical connections to behavior and the way people change over time. By using panel data from the Serious and Violent Offender Reentry Initiative, we estimate models capturing within‐person change and baseline between‐person differences in social bonds (family support) and differential association (peer criminality) at the time of release from prison. The results demonstrate that baseline levels of family support protect people from postrelease substance use but not from crime. Baseline between‐person differences and within‐person changes in peer criminality, however, are robustly related to crime and substance use. Collectively, baseline between‐person differences seem critical for behavior and within‐person change over time, and the results carry implications for reentry‐based policy as well as for theory testing in developmental criminology more broadly.     

重新认识社会主义市场经济条件下的集体主义价值观

在社会主义市场经济条件下,在处理个人与社会、个体与整体的价值关系问题上,仍然必须坚持集体主义的价值观。但是,这种集体主义价值观与传统意义上的集体主义价值观是相区别的。在新形势下,我们不但要对集体主义价值观的内涵做出新的阐释,而且要遵循集体主义价值观的建构原则。     

论文化发展的辩证运动——超越文化普遍主义和文化特殊主义

文化普遍主义和文化特殊主义的对立 ,是它们各自所代表的社会文化思潮及其所反映的特定的个人利益和民族国家利益的对立 ,因而具有物质和精神方面的侵犯性和自卫性。从文化个体生成论的角度来看 ,不同的文化都是处于不同社会发展水平和阶段之上的现实的人 ,在其历史文化传统和具体社会实践基础上进行各种建构过程的产物 ,它们之间的关系并不是彼此对立的你死我活的静止关系 ,而是前后递进、不断相互吸收和取长补短的生成发展关系。这种对于文化发展的辩证运动的理论视角 ,有利于我们扬弃文化普遍主义和文化特殊主义的对立 ,为全球化环境下的文化沟通和文化对话奠定科学的理论基础。