医疗过失认定中的若干法律问题辨析

判断医疗过失必须考虑法律对医务注意义务的具体规定和该技术职称的任职条件的基本要求。（被）容许的危险理论认为对伴随一定危险性但对社会有益和必要的行为,法律应该容许该类行为产生的一定限度的危害结果不构成过失,该理论对认定医疗过失的借鉴价值表现为：其一,医学是在探索中发展的,在医学发展与绝对保证医疗安全难以两全的利益冲突下,全社会要理解医疗风险,不应使医疗方动辄得咎;其二,医疗方实施医疗活动要以良知与＂善良管理人＂的理性谨慎地进行医疗利益与医疗风险的权衡。     

“情报主导警务”研究综述

"情报主导警务"战略提出后,学界和实务部门对情报主导警务的研究逐步从以下几方面深入开展:"情报主导警务"与"信息主导警务"概念之争;"情报主导警务"模式的内容研究;"情报主导警务"战略的情报源研究;"情报主导警务"工作机制研究;"情报主导警务"战略在专门领域中的应用研究;"情报主导警务"战略的地区模式研究;"情报主导警务"战略发展方向的研究。     

论王稼祥对党建理论的探索与贡献

王稼祥在中国革命和建设的不同历史阶段,与党内的各种错误思想作斗争,起草和发表了很多关于党的建设的文件和论著,对军队党的建设、如何保持共产党员的先进性、党际外交等方面作了精辟的论述,为党的建设理论作出了重要贡献。     

产业集聚理论对中西部地区发展民营经济的应用分析

产业集聚是区域竞争优势的源泉 ,已成为发达国家、发达地区产业成长的一个显著特征。产业集聚的本质是外部经济 ,这一外部经济的主要来源有劳动市场的共享、专业性附属行业的创造和技术外溢。产业集聚可以减少环境的不确定性 ,有利于知识和技术的传播与扩散 ,形成创业空间集聚的正反馈效应 ,已经成为区域参与全球竞争的重要力量。我国中西部地区民营经济发展基础差、总量小、比重低 ,空间上的分散配置存在着私人供给的公共产品溢出效应损失 ,服务产品需求的市场外效应损失 ,信息的、知识和技术溢出效应损失。改变这一状况的一个有效途径就是在重点地区实现产业集聚 ,为民营经济的发展创造条件 ,促进工业化 ,推进城镇化 ,提升区域经济的竞争力水平     

人文荟萃能筑巢引凤吗？ ——基于人文适宜性的中国人才区域集聚研究

经济地理学的适宜性理论认为，经济适宜性和自然适宜性对人才分布具有决定性作用，但是伴 随着人均收入水平的提高，人文适宜性对人才的吸引力有逐步增强的趋势。研究利用全国层面的城市—人才数 据对人文适宜性的人才集聚效应进行了验证。研究发现：经济和自然适宜性依然对人才分布具有决定性作用， 但人文适宜性也已成为中国城市吸纳人才的一个有利因素；电影院、文化馆等具有国情特色的人文适宜性设施 对人才的区域分布具有显著而稳健的影响；人文适宜性是人才集聚的原因而非结果；随着人文适宜性相关设施 的存量不断积累，其吸纳人才的能力和规模不会边际递减，反而有累积递增的倾向。研究建议，在人文适宜性 塑造时应突出“中国特色”，打造“经济—自然—人文”三位一体的品质城市，以吸引人才集聚。     

Psychological Aspects of Property and Ownership

Although property lawyers and theorists were always interested in the legal doctrinal construction of property rights and in political, moral, or economic justifications of property rights through the course of history, they very rarely looked into possible psychological roots of property rights and the powers they entail. Similarly, psychologists (whether with a focus on individual or social psychology) provide models for the explanation of a person’s behaviour and the social interactions of humans, but they rarely touch upon property rights at all, and if so, only in brief passing comments. The one extensive study on the social psychology of property appeared 75 years ago. This paper looks into modern research of individual and social psychology and assesses whether some of the findings can be used to explain a psychological basis for the existence and importance of property rights. That may also be a starting point for a modern interdisciplinary study in this area.

Postmodern Jurisprudence: Contesting Genres

It has become a common place of contemporary legal theory, particularly postmodernist legal theory, to reject modernist jurisprudence’s assumption of law’s disciplinary autonomy. Within this enthusiasm for interdisciplinary approaches to law, what is less common is detailed analysis of precisely how interdisciplinarity is figured, rhetorically and epistemologically, in the discourse of contemporary legal theory. It is with a view to detailed analysis of this kind that this paper emerges. Its aim is to explore in detail how interdisciplinarity might be figured, and with what consequences, in the jurisprudence of postmodernity. The particular site of this exploration will be Costas Douzinas and Ronnie Warrington with Shaun McVeigh’s Postmodern Jurisprudence: the Law of Text in the Texts of law. Published in 1991, this text remains widely influential – it has become a contemporary classic in its genre. It is not the intention of this paper, however, to represent this text as exemplary. Rather, this paper intends to read this text in its particularity, to focus on its particular vision of postmodern jurisprudence. Specifically, this paper argues that Postmodern Jurisprudence figures interdisciplinarity in terms of genre; and that this understanding of interdisciplinarity is problematised by the unacknowledged contradictions between the different conceptions of genre – one associated with Jacques Derrida and the other associated with Jean-François Lyotard – which the text invokes. This paper argues that the project of postmodern jurisprudence – as title and as label – appears rather differently if it is imagined, on the one hand (following Derrida) according to the logic of the passe-partout and, on the other hand (following Lyotard), according to the logic of the differend. The paper concludes that this internal tension should at least give us pause for thought when approaching the complex phenomenon of interdisciplinarity in postmodern legal scholarship more generally.     

论我国诉讼中的证据排除与证据禁止

我国现行立法对证据排除和证据禁止的规定,严重混淆了证据适格和证据力的基本概念和判断标准,其结果是,在事实上否认了法官排除不适格证据的权力。同时,理论上的认识也存在种种误区。应设立和完善我国证据排除和证据禁止制度,重构设想包括四方面在诉讼中彻底贯彻直接审理原则;特权规则;非法取得证据禁止原则及明显无关联性排除规则。     

工会理论政策研究的地位与作用论纲--兼论全国总工会理论政策研究的方向与方法

工会理论政策研究性质,首先是政治理论政策研究,又是经济理论政策研究,同时也是社会理论政策研究.改革开放以来,尽管中国工会理论政策研究已有相当成就,但就不断深化的改革事业以及工会运动的客观需求而言,其作用还是相当的不足或滞后.加强和改善工会理论政策研究,是实现工会工作市场化的基础和前提.全总的理论政策研究应该具有实践的前导性和理论政策的敏锐性,还应该实现学科化和社会化.     

试论李贽“童心”说的理论基础

李贽《童心说》把“童心”界定为最初一念之本心并予全面肯定,然而在中对其肯定“童心”的依据全无论证。有的学在古代中国的人性论中,寻找其理论基础。但假如考虑到李贽的理论体系,则荀子、孟子和程朱的主张都不足为其依据。其实李贽这种理论的依据主要是禅宗学说。但李贽所说的“佛”是入世的、能够帮助人解决各种世俗困难,也就是使人的世俗生活更为顺遂的明灯;并且他所说的“学佛”是要人从外在的“闻见道理”中解脱出来,从而达到一切任其自然的境界。因此,这是经过李贽改造了的佛家之说。