首都单位内部治安防控网络建设问题初探

当前首都单位内部治保工作面临的形势十分严峻,工作环境发生了许多新变化,加强单位内部治安防控网络建设十分必要。经过近两年的实践,首都单位内部防控网络建设已经取得了明显成效,今后还需继续坚持“预防为主、单位负责、突出重点、保障安全”的工作方针,把维护稳定放在各项工作首位,精确指导单位内部安全防范工作,规范内保民警的警务活动,发挥公安机关打击犯罪的职能,深入开展基层基础工作,全面推动争创“双无单位”活动的深入开展。     

论黑恶势力“内部渗透”的防治

近几年来,我国黑恶势力犯罪现象日益严重,黑恶势力不仅渗透经济领域,而且向基层政权组织进行“内部渗透”。黑恶势力进行“内部渗透”大都遵循这样一条主线:壮大经济实力——寻求“保护伞”——向党政司法机关直接渗透势力。黑恶势力“内部渗透”之所以能得逞归因于某些基层政权组织的软弱与涣散等因素。防治黑恶势力向我内部渗透须采取综合治理手段。     

高考移民现象的宪法学分析

近几年来,高考移民现象的出现严重破坏了正常的教育考试秩序,损害了考生平等受教育权,也滋生了教育领域的腐败,目前各地采取“封堵”的对策来制裁高考移民,保护本地考生利益。本文试图从高考移民产生的原因入手,结合宪法学基本理论分析这一现象涉及的深层次问题,并提出相应解决办法。     

传统发展理念的内在矛盾

传统发展理念由于其包含一系列内在矛盾而使自身陷入困境并导致了发展危机。这主要表现在:发展至上主义的迷醉及其对生存家园的遗忘;技术乐观主义的虚妄及其对有限理性的消失;人类中心主义的偏执及其对天人关系的僭越;消费享乐主义的滥觞及其对生态伦理的缺席。在揭示传统发展理念深层矛盾困境的同时,昭示当代人应自觉走出其设定的内部陷阱,从而为建构通向未来科学的发展观扫清理念上的障碍。     

论内部会计控制

随着经济规模的扩大和经营业务的多元化,外部审计机构对企业经济活动的独立审计越来越困难。尤其是抽样审计面对庞大而又繁杂的业务量,问题越来越多。为了最大限度地确保企业会计信息的真实,借助企业本身的力量延伸审计职能,不失为一条有效的途径。强化内部会计控制,并随经济环境的变化不断发展其内涵与外延,无论从数量、还是质量来说,是审计等外部监管部门确保会计信息真实、有效,加强基础力量的坚实基础。     

当代中国人口迁移的裂变

迁移行为是人口最基本的行为之一,是引起社会结构与功能变化的主要因素,人口迁移的裂变是其发挥功能的主要手段。现代化是社会发展的必然趋势,亦是这种裂变的必然成果。和平与发展是当代世界的主旋律,为我国人口迁移与裂变提供了良好环境。人口迁移的裂变在经过历史的积淀后,必将爆发,释放出推动社会飞跃的巨大能量,为实现现代化铺奠基石。     

Deliberation,Democratic Decision-Making and Internal Political Efficacy

Empirical research into the possible positive consequences of deliberation increasingly reveals that there is a complex relationship between deliberation and its effects on citizens. In this experimental study I examine the relationship between internal political efficacy and one type of deliberation: deliberative decision-making. I also test whether different structures of decision-making mediate between deliberation and internal political efficacy. The data suggest that deliberative decision-making had no direct effect on a global measure of internal political efficacy. Participants in face-to-face deliberative decision-making, though, had higher scores on a situation-specific measure of internal political efficacy than participants who only voted. The structures of decision-making had no effect on either measure of internal political efficacy. These results support claims that deliberation will not necessarily lead to direct, positive effects on citizens internal political efficacy, but they also highlight the likelihood that face-to-face deliberation can lead citizens to feel more competent in their deliberative abilities.     

Introduction

This introductory paper seeks to provide an overview of the key themes that run through the papers in this special issue. Taking their cue from some ongoing current debates about the meanings of citizenship, multiculturalism and identity in the contemporary environment, Schuster and Solomos begin by exploring some of the most significant ideas in current political and academic controversies about these issues. In doing so they touch upon some of the main policy dilemmas faced both by nation-states and by migrant and minority communities. They then move on to engage with the question of what policies need to be developed to deal with citizenship and belonging in societies that are increasingly ethnically and culturally diverse. They conclude by analysing the direction of current research and policy priorities, and provide an overview of the key arguments to be found in each of the substantive papers that make up this issue.     

融贯论、道德实在与法律——一个基于内在实在主义的整合

不同的真理理论导致不同的法律方法论。符合论实在主义的哲学会导致哲学的和自然主义的法律发现,而融贯论则是规范分析和法律解释的基础。不少哲学家认为没有脱离融贯论的符合论(如普特南)。但同时,从真理的客观性维度讲,融贯论只能保障认知的客观性,而不能获得形而上的客观性。融贯论的结果必然是相对主义。因此,法律哲学的认识论选择必然是折中的,这个折中的认识论可以由普特南的内在实在主义来承担,而内在实在主义将最终引向包容的法律实证主义。     

US mainland,EU archipelago? Convergence and divergence on transnational organized crime

The fight against organized crime has become a top security priority for the European Union (EU). While a new policy area is emerging, it is difficult to understand who is in lead and how the process develops. This article delves into the post-Lisbon EU security model, exploring how Washington and Brussels collaborate in combating organized crime in a context of changing definitions, actors and policies. It argues that US definitions, operational models and policies influence EU institutional thinking and policies, shifting the emphasis from prevention and rule of law to execution and intelligence. The dynamics of policy convergence and divergence on criminal matters in the transatlantic community reflect tectonic shifts in the deepest levels of thinking security in the West, affecting the moulding of a European security identity.