以问题为本的教学方法在公安民警培训中的运用

随着公安干警培训制度的不断改善,公安院校的职责也发生了变化,除了完成学历教育,为公安队伍输送人才外,还要承担大量的干警培训任务。怎样在规定的时间内,按要求保质保量地完成干警培训,提高培训的效果,使干警培训更贴近实战要求,更贴近公安实际工作,是公安院校面临的一个课题。本文探讨了以问题为本教学方法PBL在公安干警培训中的运用问题。     

巡警如何劝解和制止在公共场所发生的民间纠纷

发生在公共场所的民间纠纷,近几年呈逐年大幅上升的趋势。实践证明,如果对民间纠纷预防、调解、处置不力,将会给社会治安和公共安全造成很大危害。巡警作为活动在公共场所维护社会治安和公共安全的主要力量,在发现、劝解和制止民间纠纷方面发挥着关键性的作用。笔者从研究民间纠纷的性质、特点、发生以及发展规律入手,着重分析劝解和制止民间纠纷的步骤和方法,以期帮助巡警及有关力量做好调解、处理民间纠纷这项工作,扎扎实实搞好治安防范。     

第一次讯问的行为视角研究

第一次讯问是指侦查人员对特定犯罪嫌疑人实施的第一次讯问行为.基于指导办案实务的考虑,从理论上对第一次讯问行为进行总结和凝练具有重要意义.结合侦查实务工作运行情况,应当基于查明犯罪和固定口供的双重行为导向,并结合排除可翻供因素以支持诉讼的行为导向进行探讨第一次讯问行为.侦查人员通过实施第一次讯问活动,一是要突破犯罪嫌疑人...     

网上传播黑客技术行为应构成传授犯罪方法罪

利用互联网传播黑客技术的行为是众多计算机犯罪的“罪魁祸首”,严重危害网络安全,对用户的合法利益造成巨大损害。这种行为的实质是向他人传授犯罪方法,情节严重的应构成传授犯罪方法罪。     

The contested nature of political leadership in the European Union: conceptual and methodological cross-fertilisation

Abstract

European leaders have struggled to find common responses to the polycrisis the EU is facing. This crisis of leadership makes it urgent that scholars provide a better understanding of the role and impact of leadership in EU politics and policy making. This article prepares the ground for a collection of contributions that addresses this need by strengthening old and building new bridges between the academic domains of European studies and leadership studies. It opens with a discussion of the contested concept of leadership in the context of the European polity and politics, challenging the conventional view that leadership is necessarily a matter of hierarchy. Moreover, it argues that rather than leaderless, the EU is an intensely ‘leaderful’ polity. Subsequently, this introduction identifies four key debates in contemporary EU leadership research and discusses the value and insights the contributions in this special issue bring to these debates.     

推进反腐倡廉建设科学化若干问题的思考

党的十七届四中全会明确提出“提高党的建设科学化水平”,十七届中纪委四次全会又提出了“提高反腐倡廉科学化水平”等重大命题。科学理解和准确把握反腐倡廉建设科学化的基本内涵和重要意义,认真总结中国特色反腐倡廉建设科学化的基本经验,深入分析我国反腐倡廉建设科学化进程中的主要问题,积极探索推进反腐倡廉科学化的具体路径,无疑具有重要的理论和实践意义。     

对心理学方法论的扩展性探索

方法论是任何一门科学研究的基础.它既是理论的基础,也是方法和技术的基础,因此,心理学的方法论也是心理学研究的基础.方法论的探索是关系到心理学学科发展的核心问题.原有的心理学方法论的研究仅仅涉及关于心理学研究方法的探索,其实,心理学研究的方法论应该得到扩展.方法论的探索包括关于对象的立场,关于方法的认识,关于技术的思考.     

侦查讯问程序

作为案件侦查中的手段之一,侦查讯问程序被世界各国规定在刑事诉讼法中,而通过侦查讯问获得的证据——犯罪嫌疑人的供述和辩解即口供,亦成为诉讼中重要的证据种类。侦查讯问程序对于实现刑事诉讼查明案件真相、发现实体真实的目的具有重要的作用。文章结合国外有关侦查讯问程序的探讨,探究侦查讯问程序在诉讼运作过程中存在程序违法问题的原因,进而对侦查讯问程序进行重构及完善。     

Tracing Foreign Policy Decisions: A Study of Citizens' Use of Heuristics

Public opinion researchers agree that citizens use simplifying heuristics to reach real, stable preferences. In domestic policy, the focus has been on citizens delegating judgement to opinion leaders, notably political parties. By contrast, citizens have been held to deduce foreign policy opinions from their own values or principles. Yet there is ample scope for delegation in the foreign policy sphere. In this exploratory study I use a 'process-tracing' method to test directly for delegation heuristic processing in university students' judgements on the Iranian nuclear issue. A substantial minority sought guidance on foreign policy decisions, either from parties, international actors or newspapers. This was not always simple delegation; some used such heuristics within more complex decision-making processes. However, others relied on simple delegation, raising questions about the 'effectiveness' of their processing.     

Repositioning Restorative Justice in Europe

Abstract

Over the last 20 years, the European Union (EU) has invested considerable amount of resources in supporting policies and legislation that promote mediation and other restorative justice (RJ) practices at the national and regional level. Alongside these developments a series of legal safeguards, standards, and regulations were introduced to mainstream restorative justice in European criminal justice systems. While we are far from claiming that a unified restorative justice model exists across European countries, the standardization of restorative justice through top-down approaches raises serious concerns around its viability as a community-born ethos. This article draws from the findings of an EU-funded research project that focused on the implementation of the restorative justice articles of the. Victims’ Directive. The article argues that if restorative justice is not repositioned in Europe through innovation and bottom-up structures of community, unregulated, unregistered, and localized projects, it will soon face its demise. The mainstreaming, regulation, and state control of restorative justice in Europe must be balanced against what Nils Christie identified as its original intention of returning conflicts re property.