当代中国高级警官执政能力状况调查

对当代中国高级警官执政能力需求状况的调查,主要调查的是反映中国高级警官执政能力的基本状况的高级警官群体对执政党所执掌政权的合法性与支持度的认知,对执政方式存在的主要问题和原因的认知以及对政府执政成本的认知这三项指标。目前网络媒介对高级警官政治知识获取的影响力很小,换言之,以网络教学为主要手段进行高级警官执政能力训练并不现实,而以传统大众传媒(广播电视、报刊资料)的日常教育与组织学习、教育培训等专项教育相结合的双结合训练模式,是目前改善高级警官执政能力的最佳训练途径。     

The Impact of Unfunded Environmental Mandates When Environmental Quality and Timber are Produced Jointly

A number of different aspects of environmental quality are produced jointly with timber. Unfunded environmental mandates whose costs are borne strictly by the private landowner lead to reduced production of both timber and environmental quality relative to the quantity of both that would be produced in the absence of such policies. That is, acting without regard to environmental consequences, private landowners produce more environmental quality (as a byproduct of producing timber) than they do when unfunded policy mandates result in de facto partial takings for which they are not compensated.     

论股份有限公司制度在清末民初的演进

股份有限公司是一种企业组织形式,又是一种现代企业制度,两是有机统一、不能割裂的。股份有限公司这种企业组织形式自１８７２年引入中国后,与应有的现代企业制度割裂开来,先受洋务派的控制被扭曲为“官督商办制”,后被社会名流用于“救国之策”,直到五四时期中国发展的黄金岁月,才具备现代企业制度的诸机制,开始推动的持续发展。     

“HU 理论”在工资集体谈判中的运用构想探析

工资集体谈判制度是职工工资的民主决策方式,也是工会保障职工经济权益的重要手段。作为当前以改善民生为重点的社会建设的一项战略性任务,工资集体谈判在具体的实践过程中起到了一定的积极作用,尤其是在保障职工最低工资等方面成效显著。由于当前工会方的经济非独立性,从而使谈判话语权较弱,以及企业和职工对经营成果分配的不满等,导致谈判质量较低,特别是职工工资增长的谈判不够理想,从而使利益分配成为工资集体谈判的关键点。为此,针对工资谈判中的利益分配问题,本研究试图设计一个既能够满足企业的利益需求,又能够维护职工的正常工资需求的"工资联合确定模式",即在工资谈判中运用"HU理论",进行操作,实现劳资双赢,从而化解工资集体谈判在实践中的实施难题。     

Joint sector reviews—M&E experiments in an era of changing aid modalities: Experiences from JSRs in the education sectors of Burkina Faso,Mali and Niger

Aid policy and practice have been thoroughly shaken up over the past few years. One of the reform areas relates to monitoring and evaluation (M&E). In short, aid recipients are asked to elaborate result‐oriented frameworks while donors are expected to harmonise and align their policies and frameworks. This article examines the extent to which joint sector reviews (JSRs) could take the M&E reform agenda forward. JSRs are M&E exercises at the sector level which have the potential to satisfy the M&E needs of various stakeholders while, at the same time, also contributing to the M&E reform agenda. They are increasingly utilised on the ground, yet, so far, there do not exist any systematic stocktakings and/or analyses of them. Our own analysis of a sample of JSRs from the education sectors of Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger indicate that JSRs score highly on harmonisation, coordination, leadership and broad‐based participation, but poorly on alignment. They generally prioritise accountability over learning needs and largely neglect accountability and learning at the level of the sector institutional apparatus. In this article, findings from the field are contrasted with insights from evaluation theory and practice so as to provide suggestions for on the ground JSR improvements. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

关于交通肇事罪几个问题的思考

交通肇事罪作为常见多发且危害性较大的犯罪,引起理论界以及司法实务界的极大关注,同时也带来很多问题。刑法第133条和《关于审理交通肇事刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》均存在不合理之处,交通肇事罪的主观罪过形式应为混合罪过。     

试论德、日刑法中的必要共犯理论

必要共犯理论是德、日刑法共犯理论中的一个问题,该理论是与德、日的刑法理论体系相契合的,有着其鲜明的特色,必要共犯理论与我国的共同犯罪理论存在着显著的差异,对此应加以重视。     

论教唆犯的几个问题

在刑法理论中,学者们对共同犯罪中的问题进行研讨,倾注了不少的心血,从而使这一问题观点纷纭。不过,正是因为观点纷纭,反倒令人目不暇给。本文试图对教唆犯的几个问题进行一下梳理,希冀会使这一问题眉目清晰。     

The Trouble with Moral Rights

It is usually argued that moral rights are severely handicapped by their inconsistent entrenchment in common law and civilian legal systems. This article argues that the main trouble with moral rights protection is that the justifications for the existence of these rights are riddled with internal inconsistencies generated by the vagaries of copyright exploitation. Harmonising moral rights protection or using moral rights justifications cumulatively may not resolve the theoretical inconsistencies. Copyright protection must therefore be seriously overhauled if moral rights are to be widely perceived as vehicles for protecting authors' rights.     

制定民法典侵权行为法编争论的若干理论问题——中国民法典制定研讨会讨论问题辑要及评论（二）

当前起草民法典侵权行为法的主要理论问题,集中在以下几点第一,民法典既要规定绝对权请求权,又要在侵权行为法中规定侵权请求权,因此必须协调好绝对权请求权和侵权请求权之间的关系;第二,侵权行为一般条款应当采纳"埃塞俄比亚体例",概括全部的侵权行为内容;第三,侵权行为法必须规定侵权行为类型,但如何进行侵权行为类型化,需要进一步加强研究,要适合中国国情和便于司法实践操作.