意见证据规则要义——以美国为视角

意见证据规则是证据规则的重要组成部分。尽管意见证据规则在我国的立法层面已初步确立,但相关的理论研究仍然十分薄弱。鉴于意见证据规则在美国适用最为广泛,发展最为成熟,本文力图以美国为例,全面介绍意见证据规则的基本内容,分析其价值内涵、法理基础,阐释其适用的难点,探讨专家意见可靠性的属性定位,研究意见证据规则下终极问题原则基本被废弃的根本原因及专家意见受到的限制,进而就意见证据规则在我国的适用提出管见。     

两型社会背景下失地农民医疗保障制度研究

失地农民的医疗保障制度是失地农民社会保障体系中的重要内容之一。针对当前长株潭两型社会建设过程中失地农民在医疗保障制度方面所面临的问题,提出构建失地农民医疗制度的思路和原则,以及具体的解决途径,从而为完善两型社会失地农民社会保障制度提供有益的实践探索。     

强制医疗程序司法运作中的问题与完善——以检察监督权的有效行使为视角

我国精神病人的强制医疗程序性质上属于刑事司法程序,兼具治疗精神病和防卫社会的目的,奉行入院中心主义。强制医疗在司法运作中仍存在启动程序不规范、适用标准不明确、检察监督不到位、配套机制不健全等问题。检察院应履行法律监督职能,加强对强制医疗启动程序、审查程序和审查标准、执行程序的监督,实现强制医疗公正、效率、安全和人道的制度价值。     

对构建新型监狱医疗管理机制的思考

监狱体制改革正沿着“全额保障、监企分开、收支分开、规范运行”的十六字目标不断深化。社会医疗体制改革同样在稳步推进,寻求一个又一个的突破。社会医疗和监狱体制改革为构建新型的监狱医疗管理机制提供了历史性的机遇。按照建设“公正、文明、廉洁、高效”的监狱运行机制要求,正确认识当前监狱医疗机制中存在的弊病,探索和创新发展监狱医疗管理机制是重要又迫切的现实课题。     

血液中乙醇检测结果的法医学分析

目的对交通事故中血液中乙醇检测结果进行法医学分析。方法从检测方法、血液采集方法、采集时间、血液保存、尸体腐败、饮酒量与血液中乙醇质量浓度关系等方面进行血液中乙醇检测结果的法医学分析。结果检测方法、血液采集方法、采集时间、血液保存、尸体腐败等因素直接影响血液中乙醇检测结果。结论为保证交通执法的公正性，对血液中乙醇检测结果应当作法医学分析。     

Deconstructing Deliberation in the Appraisal of Medical Technologies: NICEly Does it?

Appraisals of medical technologies undertaken by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) have significant implications for the setting of priorities for health care expenditure in the NHS in England and Wales. NICE has been characterised as a deliberative body, an evaluation which reflects the recent attention paid by those working within the health policy community to the establishment of mechanisms which deliver procedural justice, in the absence of societal consensus upon the substantive values which should underpin distributive choices in health care. This article critically interrogates the assessment of NICE as deliberative in character. It also considers the relationship between legitimacy and deliberation in this policy context, in light of the claim that 'thickening proceduralisation' by establishing and enhancing deliberative structures and processes is a useful strategy for addressing regulatory problems.     

IMAGES OF GOD AND PUBLIC SUPPORT FOR CAPITAL PUNISHMENT: DOES A CLOSE RELATIONSHIP WITH A LOVING GOD MATTER?*

This study argues that the nature and intensity of a person's relationship with God creates a transposable cognitive schema that shapes people's views toward public policies such as executing convicted murderers. In this context, we investigate whether Americans who report having a close personal relationship with a loving God are less likely to support the death penalty. We hypothesize that such a relationship tempers the tendency to see punitiveness as an appropriate response to human failings. Individuals who hold a loving God image are more likely to believe that God responds to those who have “failed” or “sinned” by demonstrating unconditional love, forgiveness, and mercy. Accordingly, support for capital punishment is problematic because it contradicts the image of a merciful, forgiving deity; God's purpose—and admonition to believers—is to demonstrate compassion toward those who have trespassed against others. We test these possibilities using the 2004 General Social Survey (GSS). Controlling for a range of religious factors and other known predictors of death penalty attitudes, the results show that Americans with a personal relationship with a loving God are less likely to support capital punishment for convicted murderers.     

再论医疗事故争议纠纷的诉讼管辖

本文从正反两方面论述了医疗纠纷中以“侵权结果发生地”确定管辖权的合理性及必要性。并从司法实践出发,就如何从证据法学角度认定“结果发生地”的相关事实阐述了作者的观点。     

医疗事故罪中医疗行为的法律界定

本文在研究了我国台湾地区和日本刑法中的医疗行为后,认为我国刑法中医疗事故罪中的医疗行为是指对疾病的诊断、治疗、堕胎等以医学知识与医学技术为行为的准则,直接作用于人体,导致人体的形态和/或功能发生一定变化或恢复的医学行为的总称。