表见代理制度探析

新《合同法》第一次明确规定了我国的表见代理制度,本文剖析了两大法系表见代理制度与我国表见代理制度的异同,结合法学界不同观点对表见代理的构成要件进行分析和论证,并对实践中应注意的问题进行探讨,以期完善我国的民事代理制度。     

Social networks and non‐market strategy

To date, the field of non‐market strategy has little to offer in the way of an integrated perspective on the simultaneous management of strategic issues and corporate stakeholders. This paper employs social network analysis to make a number of theoretically grounded conjectures about the delicate relationships between stakeholder behaviour and issue evolution. It is found that social network analysis has the potential to enrich and integrate theoretical perspectives in the field of non‐market strategy, offering solutions to a set of previously unresolved puzzles. Copyright © 2004 Henry Stewart Publications     

Of change,training and public affairs in Europe

European public affairs practitioners need to be increasingly professional in their reactions to an EU undergoing transformational change. The paper offers a comprehensive summary of the subtleties of institutional change in Commission, Parliament and Council in 2004. In particular, the author argues that expansion from 15 member states to 25 has fundamentally changed the nature of the Union's politics and the skills required to influence it. This new EU requires more of practitioners than experience and amateur instinct: to achieve results and avoid restrictive regulation, the public affairs community must adopt effective training strategies, challenging competence targets and regular self‐assessment of its performance and ethics. Copyright © 2004 Henry Stewart Publications     

关于制约非公经济发展的体制瓶颈的几点思考

我国非公有制经济已成为社会主义市场经济的重要组成部分,成为发展生产力和完善社会主义市场经济体制的重要力量。但非公有制经济的发展也面临着种种困难和问题,影响非公有制经济发展的观念、制度、政策和管理等方面的制约因素依然存在。全面深入推进经济体制改革,努力构建非公经济发展的良好制度环境,才能扫除非公有制经济发展道路上的种种障碍,推动非公有制经济发展再上新台阶。     

论禁止双重危险原则中的同一性问题——以美国法律实践为视角

禁止双重危险原则是刑事诉讼中保障被告人合法权益的重要制度设计。美国法院在执行这一原则时先后使用了同一要素标准、同一行为标准及同一证据标准。之所以出现如此反复,是美国司法实践在犯罪事实及刑罚对象认识方面不断深化的结果。我国刑事司法应当借鉴关国在禁止双重危险原则之同一性问题上的司法经验,合理优化吸收犯与牵连犯理论,落实罪刑相适应原则。     

论由区分所有权人连带赔偿高空抛物所致损害的法律障碍——兼评《中国民法典草案侵权责任法编》第56条

我国侵权法草案规定侵权人不明的高空抛物致人损害,由“不能证明自己没有过错的建筑物使用人”连带承担全部赔偿责任。这实质上是对建筑物区分所有权人设定了一种对其在住宅内的行为随时举证证明的义务。这种对建筑物区分所有权人自由权利的限制和负担,无法解释和证成其正当性。建筑物区分所有权人实施的抛物行为是其承担侵权责任的根据,侵权行为人不明,受害人就无法按照侵权法获得赔偿。区分所有权人相互之间的监督义务和协助查找义务以及作证义务,乃公法上的义务;以此为根据要求其对受害人承担连带侵权责任,违反了法律关系理论的基本原理。要求建筑物区分所有权人证明没有实施抛物行为,违背了未发生的事实无法证明的证据法原理。推定所有可能实施侵权行为的人实际实施了侵权行为,违背了违法行为不能推定的侵权法原理。所以该条应该删除。     

关于按生产要素分配的经济学思考

按生产要素分配实质上是按投入生产过程的各生产要素在生产过程中的贡献进行收益分配,其理论依据是使用价值论.在社会主义市场经济条件下,以价值论和使用价值论为依据,坚持按劳分配与按生产要素分配相结合,是对马克思主义经济理论的坚持和发展.     

Can We Blame it on Rio?

The Rio de Janeiro Olympic Games were the last major sporting event in a decade‐long cycle in the Brazilian metropolis. In the years leading up to the Rio 2016 Summer Olympic Games, the city's urban planning agenda was captured by the exogenous demands of hosting the quadrennial spectacular. This capture has exacerbated four tendencies that will pertain in Rio de Janeiro for the foreseeable future: consolidation of consumer sovereignty, restructuring of urban circulations, financialisation of urban territories, and securitisation of exception.     

Migration Pessimism and the Subjective Well‐Being of Migrant Households in Mexico

A new migration pessimism argues that the economic benefits of international labour migration for migrant households may not justify the social costs. This article provides a test of this argument based on the author's survey of 304 households in Jerez municipio (municipality), Zacatecas, Mexico, in 2009. The results indicate that active households (those with at least one migrant abroad) perceived their economic situation to have improved more, but both their social cohesion and their happiness to be less than those of non‐active households. Social cohesion (family unity and maintenance of values) is shown to be pivotal in the happiness differential enjoyed by the non‐active households.