On Who matters: extending the scope of luck egalitarianism to groups

Abstract

What is the scope of principles of egalitarian justice? This is the question that Kasper Lippert-Rasmussen addresses in Chapter 6 of his Luck Egalitarianism, where he comprehensively considers the different dimensions along which the issue of the scope can be articulated (e.g. with respect to time, to the boundaries of states, etc.). For all the dimensions taken into account he defends a broad understanding of the scope of equality, except for one. He thinks that the principle of luck egalitarianism can only apply to individuals and not to groups. In this paper, we show that Lippert-Rasmussen’s reasons for caring only about inequality between individuals are unsatisfactory, and we provide an argument that justifies extending the application of the luck egalitarian principle also to groups.     

北京市农转居人员的社会保障问题及其政策选择

20世纪90年代以来,北京市的城市化过程明显加速.在城市化过程中,当城乡结合部的土地被征用以后,大批的农民转为城市居民(简称“农转居“).这些失去土地的农转居人员今后的社会保障问题将如何解决,是值得政府关注的重大事情.     

警民联合团队：新农村治安模式的构建与选择

警民联合团队是适应社会主义新农村治安治理活动的一个有益探索。它以人力资源管理学中的工作团队理论为知识背景，结合新农村警务运行现状，通过界定团队组织成员、共同目标、互动方式、信任关系、绩效评估与奖酬体系等要素来构建一种行之有效的新型警务运行模武，它的组建会对和谐农村建设产生积极的影响。     

论刑事非法证据证明能力的价值选择

在我国,刑事非法证据证明能力的价值如何选择,诉讼法理论界说法不一。对此问题的价值选择,关系到实体真实与程序正当、控制犯罪与公民权利之间利益冲突的权衡和刑事诉讼目的的实现。     

公司治理结构与会计政策选择

公司治理结构是产生会计政策选择的内在动因,公司内部和外部治理结构是影响会计政策选择的重要因素。根据我国公司治理结构的特点,我国公司会计政策选择当务之急是完善公司治理结构,规范会计政策选择,从而有效提高会计信息质量。     

调节收入差距 实现社会和谐

缩小贫富差距是构建社会主义和谐社会的一个重要方面。随着改革开放的不断深化,中国的贫富差距也日趋严重,我们必须充分分析贫富差距过大的原因并采取有效措施缩小贫富差距,促进社会主义和谐社会的构建。     

再论牵连犯

牵连犯是指行为人出于一个最终的犯罪目的实施了数个犯罪行为(目的行为、方法行为或结果行为 )而分别触犯不同罪名的犯罪形态。牵连犯是一种客观存在的犯罪形态,因此,对其宜存不宜废。判断牵连关系,应坚持主客观相统一原则,并由法官结合具体案情判定。对牵连犯的处罚,应坚持从一重重处断原则。     

养老保险基金收支模式的选择

养老保险基金收入模式可分为现收现付、完全积累和部分积累三种,养老保险基金支出模式可分为给付确定制和缴费确定制两种。基金收支模式是基金收入模式和基金支出模式的组合。基金收支模式的选择要遵循有利于基金收支平衡的实现,有利于保障功能的齐全,有利于公平与效率的兼顾,有利于养老保障和经济发展的兼顾等原则。以适当比例组合起来的复合型模式和混合型模式能够兼顾养老保险多方面功能的发挥。     

Ministerial Advisers and the Politics of Policy‐Making: Bureaucratic Permanence and Popular Control

The advent of ministerial advisers of the partisan variety – a third element interposing itself into Westminster's bilateral monopoly – has been acknowledged as a significant development in a number of jurisdictions. While there are commonalities across contexts, the New Zealand experience provides an opportunity to explore the extent to which the advent of ministerial advisers is consistent with rational choice accounts of relations between political and administrative actors in executive government. Public administration reform in New Zealand since the mid 1980s – and in particular machinery of government design – was quite explicitly informed by rational choice accounts, and normative Public Choice in particular. This article reflects on the role of ministerial advisers in the policy‐making process and, on the basis of assessments by a variety of political and policy actors, examines the extent to which the institutional and relational aspects of executive government are indeed consistent with rational choice accounts of the ‘politics of policy‐making’. The reader is offered a new perspective through which to view the advent, and the contribution of ministerial advisers to policy‐making in executive government.     

教唆未遂之理论界定

作为教唆犯罪中最为复杂的形态之一,教唆未遂一直为学界所关注.对流行性观点与传统观点语境下的教唆未遂的研究表明,二者均存在不同程度、不同维度的理论缺陷;基于其他学说基础上的教唆未遂,也未能提供科学而信服的教唆未遂理论观.而以价值取向为切入点、以纯粹的教唆犯独立性说为基础构建教唆未遂的理论体系,无疑将成为较为理想的路径选择:破除共犯理论体系下的教唆犯独立性说、从属性说或二重性说,在完整的独立犯的价值判断的基础上,重构教唆未遂理念.