行政诉讼司法建议制度的功能衍化

行政诉讼司法建议原本是一项裁判执行措施,但随着最高人民法院司法政策的变化,其发挥的事实功能被大大扩展。实践中,行政诉讼司法建议在规范性文件修改中发挥着功能性审查的作用。从社会变迁的视角观察不难发现,维稳压力、协调和解政策与地方发展型政府的模式变迁,诱发了对于行政诉讼司法建议的制度性需求,从而迫使司法建议成为行政诉讼工具箱中的重要工具。行政诉讼司法建议制度的功能衍化,为法社会学研究提供了一个极具价值的制度样本,亦为行政诉讼法的未来发展提供了背景材料。     

技术标准的规范适用初探

技术标准是一种具有特殊逻辑结构的法律形式,在静态上具有法律渊源的性质和效力.形式法渊与实质效力统一的技术标准只解决了技术标准规范的效力基础问题,是应然层面的分析.法治是一种多元开放的社会形态,法治背景下的规则多样化为技术标准的形态分析提供了理论基础,技术标准的适用亦应在法治框架内进行.要发挥技术标准的效力,解决实然上的效力问题,仍需在适用上考虑其自身特点与范式.     

社会保障权责配置：一种规范分析视角

社会保障权责配置有政府与市场和政府间之横纵两个层级。滞后的社会保障法制导致权责横纵配置的失衡-政府与市场之间配置的偏倚,政府之间配置的粗疏,这严重制约该制度功效的彰显。横向配置矫正的关键在于寻求政府责任的确定性与实现方式的多样性之间的平衡,并在发挥政府基础性作用时,倡导个人责任的回归、市场机制的引进及民间力量的渗透。纵向关系的细化要求以宪法层面原则性规定与法律层面具体性条款相结合的方式进一步规范各级政府的事权及其支出责任;从责任分担上做出更具操作性的制度安排,完善政府间社会保障支出责任分担法律机制。     

大学生信用档案建设中的诚信教育价值

大学生信用档案是大学生在信用活动中形成的第一手资料,它通过制度来规范大学生的诚信行为,其建设过程蕴含着重要的诚信教育价值。因此,高校应充分认识大学生信用档案本身和建设过程包含着的诚信教育内容,并将诚信教育贯穿于信用档案建设过程中。     

问题案件评析——“乃扒涉嫌故意杀人案”剖析

纵观"乃扒涉嫌故意杀人案"卷宗时,发现该案件在侦查破案过程中,存在侦查过程不清、被害人身份不明、审讯技巧不佳、现场有关痕迹形成没有进行合理分析、现场物证提取使用过程、卷宗制作不认真、诉讼意识不强等问题。     

电子文件与纸质档案价值鉴定之比较分析

本文主要从电子文件的价值鉴定和纸质档案的价值鉴定入手,从不同的方面比较了两者的异同,重点阐述电子文件的价值鉴定。笔者根据比较分析电子文件的价值鉴定和纸质档案的价值鉴定,对两者的鉴定工作提出了几点建设性的意见。希望本文的论述既能对档案工作者有所帮助,又能对档案研究人员有所启发。     

意匠多重保护评析

意匠多重保护,是指在赋予意匠以外观设计专利权保护的同时,给以著作权、商标权以及反不正当竞争法的保护。中国法和中国判例对意匠多重保护的态度不明朗。基于规范分析以及成本收益分析,可知意匠多重保护是不可欲的。     

Just punishments: Guideline sentences and normative consensus

The federal sentencing guidelines prescribe ranges of sentences to be given to persons convicted of felonies in the federal criminal courts. The U.S. Sentencing Commission wrote the guidelines attempting to make sentences conform to community views of appropriate punishments, along with several other criteria. Employing data from a 1994 national sample of adult Americans, designed as a factorial survey, the degree of correspondence is shown between guidelines sentences and those desired by the American public. Although at the individual level only a modest degree of concordance was found, the central tendencies of public opinion (median sentences) were found to correspond quite closely to the guidelines sentences. The major points of disagreement centered around drug trafficking crimes: the guidelines prescribed very long sentences for those crimes and distinguished sharply among trafficking in heroin, powder cocaine, and crack, whereas median sentences desired by the public were much lower and did not distinguish sharply among trafficking in those drugs. We interpret the findings as indicating that the guidelines sentences conform reasonably closely to American normative consensus concerning the sentencing of federal felons.The research reported in this article was commissioned by the U.S. Sentencing Commission. The views expressed in this article are not necessarily endorsed by the Commission. Full expositions of the findings from the national survey used are given by Rossi and Berk (1995, 1997).     

不真正不作为犯的结构与罪刑法定原则

不真正不作为犯的结构问题具有特殊性,加之刑事立法的缺失,造成对其处罚的根据不明确,这与刑法的罪刑法定基本原则相悖,引起了过多的争议,文章对不真正不作为犯存在的逻辑结构和规范结构进行了剖析,从而说明对其处罚并不违反刑法的罪刑法定原则。     

The Legality of the Image

Intimate links exist between political power, law and images. Theology, philosophy and law have always developed elaborate rules about visuality. The iconophilic and iconoclastic traditions complemented one another and combined to construct subjectivity and to reconcile humanity with finitude. In modernity, law replaced religion and philosophy conceptualised legality through the aesthetic category of the sublime. The law understands the importance of the governance of images for the maintenance of the social bond and helps organise a regime of permitted images and forbidden idols which amounts to a complex legal administration of aesthetics and a related aesthetic organisation of law.