处理银行卡盗刷纠纷的法理基础及实务要点

对于银行卡盗刷纠纷的法律处理,在迄今为止的司法实践中基本是沿着合同法思路展开。这种惯常思路固然能够给当事人以法律安抚而致银行卡应用实践以法律秩序,但实际上是以耗损效率和弱化公正为代价的。银行卡是代表持卡人财产权利的资格证券,因其使用中权利人识别机制的特点,相关义务人的识别义务、归责模式及免责事由均有本属规则,并非通常合同法规则所能涵盖,如银行卡上的证券关系与据以形成的合同关系相分离,对卡权利人的识别义务与卡的占有状态及持卡人的过错无关等。因此在处理银行卡盗刷纠纷的司法实践中,应当把握银行卡作为权利凭证的法律性质及应用规则,以此作为伪卡盗刷与网络盗刷的本质区别,并由此展开银行卡盗刷案件的情形类别设定及相应处理规则。     

Jurisprudential Foundation of the Alogithmic Enforcement and Regulation of Law in an Intelligent Society: Taking the Automated Copyright Infringement Monitoring of the Online Content Sharing Platform as an Example

As cyber-space has become increasingly important for human activities, and intelligent algorithms are widely used in cyber-space, we are rapidly entering an intelligent society. Now, algorithmic enforcement and regulations of law have posed non-negligible issues. As algorithmic enforcement of copyright law was introduced earlier than that of other laws, it provides a helpful observation perspective. The worldwide practice of copyright enforcement has gradually departed from traditional “safe harbor provisions, ” and has emphasized prior examination of shared contents uploaded by Internet service providers’ (ISPs) users through the following three dimensions: automated infringement detection algorithms voluntarily used by the ISPs, heavier judicial liability of ISPs, and updated legislation principles. Thus, innovations and development have stimulated new mechanisms and regulations for enforcing copyright in cyberspace. Algorithmic enforcement of copyright law in an intelligent society is essential and meaningful. The copyright regulation mechanisms should be guided by jurisprudential principles and concepts featuring the principles of (a) legitimate and efficient flow of information, (b) balance between and among algorithmic power, public power and private rights, (c) boosting the sharing economy and the new gig economy, and (d) promoting social governance philosophy of “coconstruction, co-governance and sharing.” These principles are meaningful for creation of a new mechanism for balancing interests between ISPs and their users, and for introducing the pluralistic co-governance mechanism beyond simply practicing “filtering obligations.” In addition, these principles are significant for improving a certification with credibility of copyright status and ownership, and for advancing a mechanism for online collegiate-panel dispute resolution.     

高职学生网络英语学习的现状与展望

文章从调查了解高职学生网络英语学习的现状入手,分析了网络英语学习对语言技能发展的利弊,从学习者的视角探讨了网络技术在高职学生英语学习中的局限性,并对高职学生网络自主英语学习的发展提出了建议及展望,以期为适合高职学生特点的网络英语教学的实践与发展提供有益的探索和尝试。     

From women for women: The role of social media in online nonprofit activities during Wuhan lockdown

The article examines the role of social media in mitigating information asymmetry and coordination problems during COVID-19 epidemic crisis. We use “Sisters-Fight-Epidemic” online volunteering project during the outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China, as a case to demonstrate how social media plays a role as a mechanism in linking multiple stakeholders and shaping their actions during the epidemic response. We show that social media facilitates the self-organizing processes of volunteers and develops the emergency information networks, therefore enabling a relatively efficient relief responses to the needs of epidemic victims particularly female medical workers. This article also identifies spontaneous online volunteering project as a new form of nonprofit organization and as a new emergent response group that can leverage the strengths of social media in disaster responses to enable effective coordination, initiate advocacy, and improve transparency of relief efforts.     

在线仲裁与B2C模式下电子商务纠纷的解决

对于不断增长B2C电子商务活动来说,一个合理的、简便易行的纠纷解决机制是十分必要的。在线仲裁制度以其便捷、高效、预见性强的特点,迎合了B2C模式下电子商务发展的要求。然而,在线仲裁作为一个新事物,在解决B2C模式下电子商务纠纷的过程中仍然存在着不少的障碍。对于这些问题一方面可以通过对现行法律制度作扩大性解释加以解决,另一方面,也可以通过发挥互联网的自律功能加以克服。     

网上仲裁法律问题研究

网上仲裁的出现不仅是在形式方面对传统仲裁的突破,更是需要人们来认识既有的仲裁法律制度所面临的新课题,包括:在线仲裁协议的形式要求,网上仲裁的仲裁地问题,网上仲裁裁决及其撤销、承认与执行以及网上仲裁是否适用现有的国内和国际仲裁法律制度。     

Internet gambling: Community flop or the Texas Hold'em poker rules1

Transformed by technology, the virtualisation of gambling has prompted administrations around the world to respond swiftly to the challenges posed by the new way of carrying out an age-old practice. However, approaches to regulation differ. Within the USA online gambling is prohibited by the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act 31 U.S.C. 5361-5367 (enacted in the USA in October 2006). This has been played out by the threats of extradition and arrests of senior executives in Texas and ultimately imprisonment for criminal infringements in among other places Las Vegas. By contrast the UK has implemented a regulatory regime through the Gambling Act 2005. The European Community has provided a regime somewhere between the two following recent European Court of Justice decisions (Plancanica 2 CMLR 25) finding against Member States operating state monopolies preventing the establishment of private providers in this specific sphere of commercial activity, contrary to Article 43TEC (right of establishment) and Article 49TEC (the right to provide services, this will of course also have the corollary of the right to receive services). The appropriateness of these responses leads the commentators back towards embryonic Internet governance discussions on cyber-paternalism and cyber-liberalism with online gambling as the case study.     

论网络购物中消费者纠纷在线仲裁解决机制的构建

目前网络购物具有虚拟、即时、小额的特点。针对于网络的这一特点有必要建立与网络购物相适应的专门的网上购物消费者纠纷在线仲裁制度,这对促进网络购物的进一步发展有着极其重要的价值。在这一制度的构建过程中,注意把握好其与传统仲裁制度的不同,积极探索网上仲裁方便、快捷的途径,加快我国仲裁制度的创新与改革。     

药品网上销售存在的风险及法律对策思考

目前国内网上购物呈现欣欣向荣景象,网上购物无论是种类还是数量都呈不断增长的趋势,药品通过网络销售也是大势所趋,然而药品由于其具有的特殊属性,使药品在网络上销售就存在着一定的风险,而这种风险直接关乎消费者的生命健康。文章根据药品在网络上销售可能存在的主要风险进行分析,并提出一些解决的思路。     

域名纠纷在线解决机制研究

域名纠纷是网络民事纠纷的一种,使用诉讼和ADR来解决域名纠纷将面临“纠纷解决的会面成本较高”等缺陷,同时域名纠纷的责任要件的认定有时借助网络就可以完成而无需当事人双方会面.为此域名管理机构创立了专门解决域名纠纷的域名ODR机制,以便快捷、廉价的解决域名纠纷.为鼓励当事人选用域名ODR来解决域名纠纷,域名管理机构把域名ODR设置为附条件的诉讼前置程序以保证域名ODR有充足的案源,另外裁决结果易于执行性、专家裁判、裁判快捷高效、费用低廉等优势成就了域名ODR,但是域名ODR也面临着困境.