论西方卢梭研究的历史演进

卢梭的诸多学说一直有着巨大影响,在西方各种精神和运动中留下印记。研究卢梭的学者们成就斐然,但各种解释互相抵牾,意见分歧已不限于卢梭的政治理论,还包括其经济学说、宗教学说、教育学说和道德学说。20世纪二三十年代,一小批学者开始进行卢梭著作统一性的研究。朗松、赖特和卡西勒三位学者为寻求卢梭那一大原则作出重要贡献。20世纪60年代中期以来,书写卢梭的大潮一直势头不减,并出现一种内在转向,即探察卢梭遗留下来的大宗零散的自传性资料,包括书信、出版著作和卢梭所有的自白,利用这些证据耐心复原卢梭的生活。这并不意味着冷落了卢梭发表的著作,而是将其融入他的整个存在。     

国家安全学视域下的人工智能安全研究：议题网络建构的初步尝试

国家安全学的创建为人工智能安全研究提供了整合与成长的契机。人工智能技术并非基于安全目的而诞生，却因其核心功能可以与既有安全体系内的诸多环节建立深度链接，从而获得了内在的安全属性。人工智能与国家安全学存在深度耦合关系，国家安全学研究框架能够为人工智能安全议题网络的建构提供基础条件。人工智能本身蕴含的“双重时空意义”与国家安全学框架内特点各异的安全领域形成复杂互动，能够在学科框架中建立以“中心—外围”结构为基本特征的人工智能安全研究议题网络。国家安全研究的六个领域同时兼容人工智能的双重身份：在研究视角更加宏观的政治安全、经济安全和军事安全领域，人工智能将以系统性要素的身份创建广泛的新议题，并成为网络的中心节点；在安全内涵相对具体的网络安全、核安全与国土安全领域，人工智能则成为重要的赋能主体，塑造了网络的半中心区域。其余十个国家安全领域与人工智能的链接相对松散，人工智能分别以博弈客体、功能性要素和技术性要素的身份发挥次要作用，从而构成议题网络的外围区域。议题网络的创建有助于人工智能安全研究迈入学科化的发展轨道。     

Understanding markers of trust within the online stolen data market: An examination of vendors’ signaling behaviors relative to product price point

Research Summary

The current study examined 1055 stolen data products across 40 vendors on the Open and Dark Web to determine whether different product- and vendor-level behaviors predicted vendors’ trustworthiness as reflected in their product price point. Understanding the mechanisms that convey trust in the underground marketplace is crucial as it could help law enforcement target serious actors and disrupt the larger marketplace. Findings suggest the online stolen data market may resemble an uninformative cost condition where buyers are unable to accurately differentiate credible sellers due to the obscure nature of signaling behaviors.

Policy Implications

Law enforcement would benefit from designing fake shops and deceptive forum posts that transmit mixed signals to complicate market participants’ process of interpreting trust signals as intended. These interventions would generate high levels of risk that encourage both buyers and sellers to exit the online illicit marketplace without needing law enforcement arrests. Law enforcement could also target prominent market facilitators to generate a larger disruption that prevents actors from continuing their illicit behavior.