人民监督员制度的人权保障功 能简

人民监督员制度在尊重和保障人权方面发挥了较大的作用，加强了对检察机关的监督与制约，对保障刑诉法尊重和保障人权原则得到正确执行有重要意义。更好的发挥人民监督员制度尊重和保障人权功能应从以下几个方面着手：选任优秀的人民监督员队伍；尝试扩大人民监督范围；创新人民监督员监督形式。     

中国人力资本投资状况及其政策选择

人力资本投资状况对我国经济发展和劳动者个人收入水平有着至关重要的影响。虽然我国对人力资本的投资总量在逐年增长,但我国的人力资本投资支出还远远低于各国平均数,与物质资本投资相比较,人力资本投资的相对量还处于较低水平,投资结构也不尽合理。     

论我国女性人力资源开发中存在的问题及对策建议

女性人力资源开发对我国经济和社会可持续发展具有不可替代的重要作用,但我国女性人力资源开发中还存在着人力资本投资不足、人力资源结构不合理及利用不充分等诸多问题。完善女性人力资源的管理体制和利用机制、加大女性人力资本投资、优化和调整女性人力资源结构、优化女性人才成长的社会环境是应对策略。     

人耳自动识别技术探讨

人耳识别是一种新的生物识别技术。一套完整的人耳自动识别系统一般应该包括以下几个环节:人耳图像采集、图像预处理、人耳图像的边缘检测与分割、特征提取、样本训练和模板匹配。人耳识别方法主要有主元分析法、神经网络法、力场转换方法、基于3D耳朵检测和识别方法。     

What Limits for Government Control? Civil Liberties and Anti‐terror Measures after the Heathrow Bomb Plot

The threat posed by transnational terrorism has excited debate about how best to calibrate relations between government, the courts and parliament: how can the provision of internal security be facilitated, whilst respecting freedoms and ensuring that policies enjoy broad legitimacy? Attention has focussed primarily on the power of the courts. Sections of the government have mooted a curtailment of judicial competencies; by contrast, a broad range of actors calls for ‐ at the least ‐ the maintenance of current judicial powers as the best means to prevent government from exploiting its already large scope for manoeuvre, as well as to overcome public scepticism. Yet the current debate misses the point that relations between government, courts and parliament have already been altered. Government has gained extra political resources thanks to its participation in forms of international counterterrorist cooperation. This shift of power, and associated problems, were clear during the recent ‘Heathrow bomb plot’.     

对"社会主义政治文明"的阐释

“社会主义政治文明”是一个全新的概念。研究和把握“社会主义政治文明”要同研究社会主义物质文明和精神文明结合起来,要正确认识和把握“社会主义政治文明”与人类政治文明成果的关系,从而深刻理解这个命题的理论和实践意义。     

"入世"与我国政府人力资源开发

"入世"之后,由于政府职能的转变和激烈竞争的要求,我国将面临较大的人力资源缺口,尤其是在外贸、外语、金融、环保、谈判等方面,人才缺乏,必须尽快进行卓有成效的人力资源开发,才能应对因"入世"带来的各种挑战.     

THE SEXUAL SUBALTERN IN CONVERSATIONS “SOMEWHERE IN BETWEEN”: LAW AND THE OLD POLITICS OF COLONIALISM

Ratna Kapur’s recent book entitled Erotic Justice proposes a new politics of postcolonialism whereby the sexual subaltern disrupts the normative principles of the universal, liberal, legal domain. Kapur traces legal strategies regarding censorship, sex-work, homosexuality, sexual harassment, trafficking and migration which travel a treacherous path, countering allegations of ‘unIndian’ and Western practice with cultural histories of ‘authentic’ sexual legitimacies, towards a new politics of desire. Kapur frames her analysis through postcolonial feminist theory as providing a tool for feminist struggle, yet distinct from and disruptive of a liberal project of global sisterhood. This review deeply values the role of the sexual subaltern which disrupts the tenets of a linear, progressive liberalism. Drawing upon Indian feminist and Western feminist perspectives, the review considers how the distinct position of the postcolonial sexual subaltern subject informs the generic role of law as a tool constructing relations of domination regarding gender, sexuality, caste, property and religion. Kapur observes that both the West and the Hindu Right have engaged with liberal legal principles. This engagement, I argue, exposes and informs law as a historical and contemporary tool of gendered legal colonialism, for sisters to disrupt across the Western and Eastern terrains.Review of Ratna Kapur’s Erotic Justice, Law and the New Politics of Postcolonialism, London: Glasshouse Press, 2005, 219 pp., ￡26, ISBN 1-90438-524-9     

Before Identity, Gender and Human Rights

This is the beginning of an exploration of before as the thesis ‘before’ (temporally) and ‘be-fore’ (spatially) difference. Before denotes the origin and the desired destination. Before (in the double sense of ‘before’ and ‚be-in-the-fore’) opens up a space of pre-difference, of origin and of forgotten memory, as well as a space of desire, objective, illusion of teleology, unity, completion. Applied to the two domains of Human Rights and Sex/Gender, the space of ‘before’ yields two slightly different vistas: in human rights, a premodern, functionally undifferentiated society which had to invent human rights as its safeguards of functional differentiation. In Sex/Gender, ‘before’ brings a self-referential construction: that of ipseity, as the form of identity beyond comparison that does not play with id but with ipsum. Ipseity is inoperable but not useless. It is inoperable because it cannot be observed from anywhere without suffering rupture. It is not useless because it offers a ground for the reconceptualisation of difference, both through awe and desire.