国际私法中的识别问题比较研究

文章对学术界有关识别对象的主要观点和识别依据的各种学说进行了比较和分析,客观地剖析了我国学术界有关“二级识别”的错误观点,并从理论和实践的角度论证了我国对识别依据问题应采取的态度。     

我国现行宪法在私有财产保护方面的缺陷及其补救途径--修宪之后的思考

一般认为,我国现行宪法在私有财产保护方面存在着两方面的缺陷,即形式缺陷和实质缺陷.对此有三种补救途径:修改宪法的途径,宪法解释的途径,立法法确立的立法监督的途径.本文认为,在强化对私有财产的法律保护方面,立法法所确立的立法监督途径能够发挥比修改宪法或解释宪法更为实际的作用;在宪法监督机制得不到改善的提前下,增补修正有关私有财产保护的宪法条款,对于强化私有财产保护,并无太大的实际意义.     

The new OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: better but not enough

This viewpoint addresses the extent to which the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises adequately serve as a system of global governance for MNEs. We argue that, while a 2011 revision has strengthened the Guidelines, their somewhat limited scope, voluntary nature, and less than satisfactory implementation render their potential utility unrealised.     

Governance within public–private partnerships and the politics of urban development

Public-private partnerships are the preferred vehicles for the planning, financing and implementation of contemporary urban development. Scholarship on public-private partnerships tends to examine their activities in advancing development. Less attention is accorded to their internal dynamics or governance. While partnerships are intended to build internal consensus and obtain consent in order to carry out urban development, this premise assumes that coordinated public and private interests are in play. This paper examines the internal governance of two public-private partnerships in Rochester, New along three dimensions: conformity to a collective purpose or vision, leadership structure and organizational style.     

National Varieties of Public–Private Partnerships (PPPs): A Comparative Analysis of PPP-Supporting Units in 19 European Countries

Most countries that have adopted the public–private partnership (PPP) model as a means of implementing infrastructure projects have launched dedicated supporting units to guide policy development and stimulate project implementation. This paper draws on the theoretical notion of PPP-enabling fields to carry out a comparative analysis of the roles and functions of PPP-supporting units across 19 European countries with varying PPP experiences. We distinguish four categories of national support of PPPs, from skeptical systems of zero support to full-fledged PPP systems. Furthermore, we take initial steps to analyze the possible link between national differences in institutionalized PPP support and the amount of implemented PPP projects. Finally, pathways for further research on PPP-supporting units are discussed.     

城市房屋拆迁中私人财产的保护

在目前的城市房屋拆迁实践中,广泛存在着无视公民基本财产权利、政府角色错位、商业利益盗用公共利益之名,补偿不公平、不合理等现象。针对这些问题,通过探求其原因,从明确政府在拆迁中的定位、合理界定公共利益、确立公平的拆迁补偿原则、信息公开等方面强化房屋拆迁中对私人财产的保护。     

Sexual Orientation Discrimination after Grant v South-West Trains

In Grant v South-West Trains [1998] ECR I-621, the European Court of Justice implied that, as a general matter, discrimination against an employee on the ground of sexual orientation did not violate Article 141 EC. This article argues that Grant rests on shaky foundations, in that it is conceptually inconsistent with the Court's earlier decision in P v S and Cornwall County Council [1996] ECR I-2143. Furthermore, the scope of Grant has since been qualified by decisions of the European Court of Human Rights – decisions which may well have undermined the status of the case more broadly. However these difficulties are ultimately resolved, the Court of Justice's treatment of sexual orientation discrimination exposes flaws in its approach as a self-proclaimed constitutional court.     

适用与限制：法律解释中的目的解释方法

作为一种重要的法律解释方法,目的解释的基本含义是按照法律规范的目的阐释法律疑义。按照公、私法不同的划分,目的解释有着不同的适用方式,进而决定了其适用范围。由于目的解释有着主观性和任意性的特征,需要运用法律制度内外的各种因素对其适用进行限制。     

社会转型期俄罗斯的公共所有权制度——兼论公共所有权与私人所有权的制度关系

上世纪90年代以来形成的俄罗斯公共所有权制度,在其主体、客体、权能、实现路径,及其调整社会生活范围、比重等方面,都经历了与社会转型同步的变迁。其中的重要线索是：在延续公共财产民法整体调整传统方法的前提下,围绕实现公共利益的根本目标,回应公共财产客体功能的特殊性及由此产生的法律调整方法特殊性要求,吸收与改造了大陆法国家“公产”与“私产”二分体制,构建了由俄罗斯特色的公共所有权向私人所有权循序过渡的类型序列。     

再论我国公立高等学校之法律地位

我国公立高等学校的法律地位问题日益成为教育法制的焦点。本文认为,高等学校在不同方面具有不同的法律地位:其在行使法律、法规授予的行政管理等职权时,是行政主体;在接受有关行政主体监督、管理时,是行政相对人;在管理有关资产以及进行平权性质的活动时,是民事主体。此外,公立高校与其内部群体如教师、学生等存在多种复杂的法律关系。因此,我们把握公立高等学校的法律地位需要一种综合性的视角,并注意具体区分授权基础、行为类型和事务性质。