警察执法权益受侵害的现状、原因和对策

当前警察在执法过程中受到侵害的事件屡有发生，分析其产生的原因，找出应对的策略，采取切实可行措施，能有效保障警察在执法活动中的合法权益。     

程序正义的有限性——电影《马背上的法庭》观后感

目前在法学界都普遍接受了程序正义、程序至上的观点时,电影《马背上的法庭》所反映的事实却对此提出了质疑,在这里我们看到的更多的却是程序过剩,而对于此问题的出路并非在于舍弃程序而是要加强程序分流,同时完备程序设计上的不足。     

当前宏观调控应抓好的几个问题

经济全球化的发展 ,对政府宏观调控提出了更高的要求 ,创造并维护一个有效率的市场是政府宏观调控的重要目标。要保持国民经济快速健康发展 ,必须从几个方面加强和改善宏观调控。     

我国黑社会性质组织犯罪的特点及心理基础

打击黑社会性质组织犯罪是当前我国司法机关的一项重要工作。黑社会性质组织犯罪社会危害性巨大 ,严重危害着社会治安稳定 ,甚至威胁着地方政权 ,也是当今世界各国重点防范与打击的对象。为了有效地遏制和打击这一日趋严重的社会治安问题 ,文章针对这类犯罪的特点 ,分析了我国当前黑社会性质组织犯罪形成的社会心理原因。     

Employee concerns regarding self-managing work teams: A multidimensional justice perspective

The increase in the use of self-managing work teams in organizations has been accompanied by growing employee resistance and concern about what such dramatic changes mean to workers. Using an organizational justice perspective, this chapter identifies and examines employee concerns about the move to self-managing work teams in two Fortune 500 organizations. Employee fairness concerns regarding three types of justice—distributive, procedural, and interactional—are highlighted. Findings suggest that to address employee fairness concerns regarding the move to self-managing work teams, managers should act distributively, procedurally, and interactionally justly.[Self-managing work teams are] the right way and the only way to be productive.—Self-managing work team member in a Fortune 500 company     

我国古代封建政权治吏略论

人类历史上文官制度的创始者归为中国,而尤为封建官吏制度备受世人推崇。中国古代的封建官吏制度是中国 古代封建政治制度的一个重要组成部分,它对封建制国家的产生、发达产生过重要影响。试图从中国古代封建官 吏的选任、考核、奖惩、监察等方面揭示一些带有共性的,已被历史证明是成功的,可供我们现在参考、倦鉴的一些 法律和制度。     

COMPROMISED POLICE LEGITIMACY AS A PREDICTOR OF VIOLENT CRIME IN STRUCTURALLY DISADVANTAGED COMMUNITIES*

This study examined whether indicators of compromised police legitimacy explained variations in violent crime within New York City police precincts from 1975 to 1996. Integrating models of urban cultural attenuation and procedural justice, the study hypothesized that variations in patterns of police misconduct and over/under policing (the indicators of police legitimacy) would predict variations in violent crime rates of communities characterized by concentrated structural disadvantage. Using a panel design and controlling for the relevant ecology of crime factors and spatial autocorrelation, the study found that in communities characterized by high disadvantage, incidents of police misconduct predicted variations in violent crime; in communities characterized by extreme disadvantage, both indicators of compromised police legitimacy (misconduct and over policing) predicted variations in violent crime. The study found no significant relationships between the indicators of police legitimacy and violent crime in communities of low disadvantage. Findings support emerging arguments that emphasize the importance of formal institutions of social control in the most structurally disadvantaged communities (that is, those often subjected to cultural attention) and suggest implications for the ecology of crime model and police accountability.     

论审查起诉中的补充侦查

补充侦查体现了诉讼程序往复的可能性,如果处理不当将破坏诉讼的终局性和程序的公正性。从对新刑事诉讼法对补充侦查制度改革的法条解读看,在部分事实不清的情况下,并不一定要进行补充侦查;在案件不符合起诉条件时,应及时中止包括补充侦查在内的诉讼程序。对由补充侦查制度凸显出的侦控关系,有必要适当提升公诉机关的地位,加强公诉机关对侦查活动的监督与制约。     

The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior

To investigate the relationship between fairness and organizational outcomes, the present study examined the survey responses of government employees at six Federal installations. Indices of procedural and distributive fairness were factor-analytically derived. Multiple regression analyses indicated that both the procedural measures and the distributive measures were significantly related to measures of job satisfaction, evaluation of supervisor, conflict/harmony, trust in management, and turnover intention. Procedural fairness accounted for significantly more variance than distributive fairness in each of these criterion measures, except for turnover intention. These findings are related to conceptual and methodological issues concerning procedural fairness and organizational behavior.     

业绩考评体系中的不规范刑事诉讼行为浅析

业绩考评体系是影响现实刑事司法活动的重要规则。对不规范诉讼行为的惩治是业绩考评体系中的重要内容。虽然不同的机关(部门)对某些不规范刑事诉讼行为关注的重点和有所不同,但是,他们在业绩考评体系中不仅采用列举方式对不规范刑事诉讼行为进行了规定,而且将不规范刑事诉讼行为按照严重程度进行了等级划分,并且一致对这些不规范刑事诉讼行为持否定态度。这充分说明了司法实践对不规范刑事诉讼行为的认识程度。业绩考评体系中对不规范刑事诉讼行为规制的尝试,也为刑事程序法的完善提供了有益的参考。