Are Public-Led Arts Incubating Programs a Double-Edged Sword? A Case Study of the Arts Council Korea’s Performing Arts Grant Program

A nation’s cultural policy is derived from its political and governance history, and its past practices. Taking the genealogical traits of South Korean cultural policies into account, the authors examine the contributions and risks of a public-led arts incubator program. One of the Arts Council Korea’s grant programs in the arts-incubating structure was involved with a public funding scandal of political intervention during the grant review process. Consequently, questions were raised about the current bureaucratic system for cultural policy. This article discusses the legitimacy of state intervention in the arts, and analyzes the case with relevant collected documents and interviews.     

经济法与民法视野中的干预——对民法与经济法关系及经济法体系的研究

干预是外力对某种关系或机制的一种介入。在法律中 ,并非只有经济法才体现公权的干预 ,民法也体现了公权的干预 ,只是两种干预在对象、功能、手段、广度、深度及有效干预的前提等方面有着差异 ,这些差异构成了民法与经济法的区别。文章主要探究了这两种公权干预的质的规定性 ,并在此基础上对经济法体系中几个有争议问题作了一点探讨。     

芪参护心方治疗冠心病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗术后气虚血瘀型心绞痛30例

目的 评价芪参护心方联合西药常规治疗冠心病经皮冠状动脉介入（percutaneous coronary intervention,PCI）术后气虚血瘀型心绞痛的临床疗效。方法 选取成功施行冠心病PCI术后气虚血瘀型心绞痛患者60例,随机分为对照组和研究组各30例。对照组采用阿司匹林、氯吡格雷、他汀等西药常规治疗,研究组在对照组的基础上加用芪参护心方治疗。治疗1个月后评价两组患者临床疗效、中医证候疗效及血脂变化情况。结果 研究组临床疗效、中医证候疗效均显著优于对照组（P<0.05）;治疗后两组总胆固醇、三酰甘油、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平均较治疗前显著下降(P<0.05),其中研究组治疗前后低密度脂蛋白胆固醇差值显著大于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 芪参护心方联合西药常规干预治疗冠心病PCI术后气虚血瘀型心绞痛有较好疗效,可明显改善心绞痛症状,减少心绞痛发生率,提高患者生活质量。     

论澳门博彩业管制中的政府“暂时介入”简

澳门《娱乐场幸运博彩经营法律制度》第44条规定了三种特殊情境下政府得暂时介入博彩企业之经营,该条款十余载间却始终遭受政府弃用.公共政策的肇因固然可解释缘何第44条难以完成从“纸面中的法”向“行动中的法”的嬗变,但分析表明,条款自身的粗陋与模糊亦是澳门政府“弃法不用”的直接原因.基于性质归属,暂时介入是行政即时强制之一种,其蕴藏弱规制与强规制手段的双重品性.依此,文章以法治政府建设的二维要素——“合法性”与“最佳性”为分析工具,对暂时介入的启动时机、启动条件、介入主体、介入程序等进行了缜密设计,希冀能为暂时介入条款的完善提供修改路径与方向.     

Early detection and early intervention in prison: improving outcomes and reducing prison returns

Our aim was to investigate whether early detection was feasible in prison and whether it could improve mental health outcomes in young prisoners. A secondary aim was to explore whether it can reduce returns to prison. Between 2011 and 2014, a total of 2115 young prisoners were screened, 94 (4.4%) met criteria for ultra-high risk for psychosis and were offered an intervention, 52 actually received it. Return to prison data were sought on the 52 participants, receiving a formal intervention. Of the 52 prisoners who received an intervention, 30.8% returned to custody compared to national average reconviction rates of between 45.4 and 66.5%. Our results suggest that early detection is a feasible option in a prison setting, improving mental health outcomes and reducing returns to prison. Mental health outcomes were recorded for a sub-sample of those receiving the intervention. The results indicated statistically significant improvements on measures of depression, anxiety and psychological distress.     

浅谈对家庭暴力的法律干预

家庭暴力是我国一个严重的社会问题,它泛滥的重要原因之一是法律对家庭暴力的干预力度不够和家庭暴力立法的滞后。尽快出台《家庭暴力防治法》,完善我国预防和制止家庭暴力的法律体系是控制家庭暴力最迫切而有效的手段之一。     

政府干预与劳动者权益--兼与王一江先生商榷

最低工资制度在中国的实施是有效的,并不会出现劳动经济学理论规范分析得出的"获益者是被覆盖部门,损失者是未覆盖部门"这种现象.主要原因是,中国规范部门的工资高于均衡工资,更高于最低工资;中国不规范部门,实际上是雇主垄断型劳动力市场.政府应该干预劳动力市场、劳动关系的运行,政府干预的价值取向是,确立劳动者主体地位、追求经济效率.     

EARLY INTERVENTION IN NEW ZEALAND FAMILY COURT CASES

In April 2010 the New Zealand Family Court introduced the National Early Intervention Process (NEIP) to diversify its previous unitary dispute resolution pathway into two tracks (standard and urgent). A “triage” model is now in use to assess and assign cases appropriately. This article outlines the key milestones in the Family Court's 30‐year history which have led to this new initiative to reduce delays and help avoid the escalation of family conflicts over the care of children into bitter and intractable disputes. NEIP represents the most overarching reform of the Family Court since the Court's inception in 1981.     

清代地方政府市场干预行为探析——以广西地方官府为例

清代的广西地方官府在维护市场规则、统制经营、调控金融和公务采买等方面所采取的市场干预行为对当时广西的经济运行秩序产生了双重影响:既利于市场环境的改善,有助于经济平稳运行,也因违反市场规律而导致经济波动不稳,制约了地方经济的发展。     

非政府组织介入WTO争端解决机制的实证分析及其利弊考量

WTO争端解决机制正式运作以来,许多非政府组织不断以向争端解决机构提交“法庭之友”陈述的方式介入到争端解决程序中来。一方面,非政府组织的介入可以提请法官注意到争端当事方可能忽略的法律、环保、人权等问题,提高裁决的质量并增强WTO的透明度;另一方面,这种介入也可能会给当事方造成额外的诉讼负担,影响裁决的效率等等。因此,如何在允许非政府组织以“法庭之友”身份介入争端解决机制的情况下做到公平与效率的平衡才是我们所要解决的根本问题。