论职业教育中"现代人"人格的培荠

这是一个强调发展、立足变革的时代。社会高速运转，不确定·性和可选择性同时增强，在这种背景下，真正的职业教育应该是着眼明天、面向未来的教育。因此，如果离开了时代精神谈人格的建构是毫无意义的，人格建构的核心应该是时代精神的完美承载。本文为职业教育中的“人格”输入了一个关键词“现代人”，并就现代人人格的概念、基本特征和培养策略等问题展开了讨论。     

案外人申请再审的冷思考——文本分析的视角

民事程序的完备性关系到权利人寻求救济的途径,由于我国目前存在着判决生效后的效力及于当事人之外的案外人,致使有损该案外人利益或者对该案外人利益造成威胁的现象,出于对其利益的保护,有必要设置相应的制度保护案外人的合法权益。而我国目前法律规定对案外人的保护存在一定的不完善性与矛盾性,所以有必要设立独立的案外人撤销之诉。     

《阿格尼斯·格雷》的叙事解读

《阿格尼斯·格雷》是安妮·勃朗特的代表作，全书以女主人公第一人称的自叙述视角写成，体现出内聚焦型的视角和自叙体的风格，在叙事上独具特色。作者站在英国维多利亚时代的进步立场上，塑造了阿格尼斯格雷这个既坚持道德原则又富有反抗精神的女性文学形象，揭示了社会的不平等和不合理，表现出强烈的不满和抗议。这是《阿格尼斯·格雷》在主题意义上的独到之处。     

环境法“生态人”人性预设之否定——基于西方法律人性预设演进的视角

法律的人性预设的基本要求一是必须注意区分法律的人性预设与伦理道德的人性要求，二是必须基于对现实客观的人性标准的认识。作为法律的环境法的人性预设既应区分“环境法的人性预设”和“环境伦理的人性要求”，又必须准确把握现实人的人性标准。以这样的基本要求为工具审视环境法理论界的“生态人”理论，就能看出学者们共同采用了“应然模式”，没有注意区分“环境法的人性预设”与“环境伦理的人性要求”，且普遍存在不忠实于现实人性，不符合环境法人性预设的基本要求。所以，现阶段不宜直接将“生态人”作为环境法的人性预设。     

我国问责官员复出面临的现实困境与理性选择

本意是使我国吏治进入＂能上能下＂有效运行的官员复出机制,目前却面临着非公开化、非责任化、非透明化、社会认同度低的困境。因此,有效解决问责官员复出面临的现实困境,完善问责的基础,明晰官员的职责和构建相应问责程序;转变问责的模式,变＂权力问责＂为＂制度问责＂;建立官员复出的回应机制,使体制外的＂权利问责＂与体制内的＂权力问责＂、＂制度问责＂形成完整体系;建立多元化的问责主体,提高官员复出的社会认同度是关键。     

《个人独资企业法》调整主体范围浅议

《个人独资企业法》主体范围不明确 ,造成实践中某些企业难以纳入法制管理。作者认为 ,个人独资企业法的主体应包括有商学的个体工商户、私营企业     

The Rational Mastery in the Work of Cornelius Castoriadis*

In this article, I make the claim that the notion of rational mastery in the work of Cornelius Castoriadis is of outmost importance for fully understanding his philosophy. Yet, this notion has largely been ignored by the literature thus far. For this reason, I intend to highlight here the importance it assumes in Castoriadis’ philosophy. To this end, I argue that the notion of rational mastery in Castoriadis’ philosophy consists in an imaginary signification of progress that develops from modernity onwards in the form of unlimited expansion of technology and economy. I continue by presenting Castoriadis’ criticism of rational mastery. I then expand his criticism into the broader context of what I claim to be the social-historical perspectivism of Castoriadis’ logic-ontology of Magmas. Finally, I conclude with the demonstration of Castoriadis’ project of individual and collective autonomy as the counterweight to rational mastery of unlimited expansion of technology and economy against nature and society.     

Designing stakeholder consultations: Reinforcing or alleviating bias in the European Union system of governance?

Consultations with stakeholders are a policy instrument widely used by policy makers to design policies and prepare legislative proposals across national and supranational systems of government. The European Union has recently reviewed its stakeholder consultation regime and asked for stakeholders’ policy input. This offers an opportunity to examine empirically stakeholders’ own evaluation of the regime and to ask a fundamental question about its democratic credentials: Do stakeholders recognise the EU consultation regime as reinforcing bias in interest representation by benefiting policy insiders, or conversely as an instrument that alleviates bias in supranational policy making? Building on rational choice institutionalism, this article outlines the potential distributional outcomes of the regime and argues that they are likely to vary along the lines of a classic divide in policy making that opposes policy insiders to outsiders. Two competing narratives are discussed in relation to the expected direction of this variation by focusing on insiders’ incentives to support or oppose the regime. The observable implications are tested empirically on an original dataset containing information about stakeholders’ positions on the evaluation of the regime status quo, its proposed further institutionalisation and their recommendations for change. The findings describe a consultation regime that seems to have created conditions alleviating bias in stakeholders’ participation in supranational policy making. This is evident in the lack of systematic, significant differences between insiders and outsiders in the evaluation of the consultation regime. Where differences do occur, they are consistent with the image of a consultation regime that has not reinforced bias in favour of policy insiders. These actors are found to be more critical of the regime status quo, its institutionalisation and more inclined to recommend policy improvements. This supports an optimistic view over the democratic credentials and legitimacy of the EU consultation regime and outlines an additional scenario under which policy actors that are traditionally associated with exerting more power and influence find themselves stripped of their privileged position in the context of European supranational governance.     

Trafficking of Ethiopian women to Europe – making choices,taking risks,and implications

ABSTRACT

This piece focuses on the Ethiopian women victims of trafficking – the agency of these women in the whole trafficking process, and issues of choice – ‘trying a chance’, or just taking a risk to get out of poverty or difficult social circumstances, considering that they are lured, tricked, coerced, or even forced into the hands of traffickers by a wide range of circumstances and people, including family and friends. Traffickers target girls with economic, social, and family problems. Most of the trafficking of women and girls from Ethiopia is carried out through the use of service ‘agencies’ and human smugglers who facilitate the process of migration through a number of routes. Many of those who use the ‘desert route’ often begin from Sudan to North Africa from where they cross to Europe. The data for this contribution were generated in a study – ‘Captured in Flight: Experiences of violence among African women in Sweden’ – funded by the Swedish crime prevention agency (Brottsoffermyndgheten). The research for the project has been carried out in Sweden, but the women whose case studies are presented here have been in the Middle East, Turkey, Italy, Finland, and Greece before coming to Sweden.     

略论公众人物的隐私权

《民法典 (草案 )》首次在立法上使用了“公众人物”的概念 ,但在随后的九届全国人大常委会第 31次会议的审议中即被删除。笔者认为 ,今天的中国已经具备了对“公众人物”进行社会监督的基础和空间。“公众人物”也是人 ,他们也和普通人一样享有宪法和其他法律赋予的一切权利包括隐私权 ,同时又由于他们是“公众人物” ,其权利应该受到一定的限制