论粤港澳跨境有组织犯罪区际侦查合作模式及原则

“一国两制”使我国成为一个多法域国家,利用各法域之间立法、司法的差异与冲突逃避打击已成为跨境有组织犯罪愈演愈烈的主要原因之一。从粤港澳三地的区域性特点出发,以三地警方多年区际侦查合作的实践探索为基础,创建区域性专项区际侦查合作模式是有可行性的,也是遏制该区域跨境有组织犯罪的有效对策。其基本原则是:坚持“一国两制”原则;平等协商、对等互助原则;尊重对方法律制度原则;公共秩序适当保留原则;以犯罪地为主,以有效惩治犯罪为辅,合理界定侦查管辖权原则;以及简便、及时、效率等原则。     

建设天津东疆自由贸易港区 促进环黄渤海区域经济发展与合作

国务院已经正式批准设立天津东疆保税港区,并允许东疆港区借鉴国际惯例在通关、外汇、物流、贸易、税收等多个领域先行先试,成为我国对外高度开放的示范区。保税港区是自由港的雏形,是向自由港的过渡。自由贸易港区是天津东疆保税港区的发展目标。建成后的天津东疆保税港将成为天津港作为世界一流大港的标志性区域和现代港口功能示范区,港口的建设与发展将对环黄渤海合作与发展产生不可估量的影响。     

浅析现阶段西部民族地区经济发展中的问题及对策

现阶段西部民族地区经济发展出现了许多问题和难题,但归纳起来不外乎"人"和"财"的问题,所以,扫除西部民族地区经济发展的阻力和障碍,必须解决好人的思想、人的知识结构和人的素质问题;解决好资金的调配、筹措及引资等问题.处理好了这两个大问题,西部民族地区经济的发展便有了"软"、"硬"件的保障和基础.     

元代江南多族士人圈的地域特色

There appeared multi-ethnic circles of literati in Yuan Dynasty founded by Mongolia nationality . The paper analyzes the characteristics of multi-ethnic circles of literati in regions south of Yangtze River: compared with circles of scholars in Khankaliq, there were more tours and banquets, more retired officials and monks in the circles of literati; in the late Yuan the non Han Nationality scholars mourned and acknowledged patriotic literati. Under the influence of South Yangtze River culture, the literati were more and more elegant. The ethnic character, national psychology and nationality religion which were presented by the scholars of the minority nationality, also imported the diverse and inclusive South Yangtze River culture, and added new color to it.     

在历史与现实之间——关于西部地区哲学现状的断想

在当代,我国西部地区的哲学现状及其发展与国内其它经济和文化发达的地区相比存在一定差距。作为一种文化现象,造成西部地区哲学滞后的原因,既要从物质生产状况和经济发展的方面去分析,也要研究历史的、文化传统的、学术传统的诸多因素的原因。     

对我国欠发达地区农业劳动力转移的几点思考

欠发达地区农业劳动力转移具有重要意义和特有形式。欠发达地区农业劳动力转移具有诸多制约因素。只有针对制约因素,采取相应对策,才能较好地实现欠发达地区农业劳动力的转移。     

以人与自然和谐为基础谋发展——中西部地区的路径选择

中西部地区长期以资源换增长的传统经济“赶超”战略的实践结果令人忧虑。必须选择人与自然和谐为基础的绿色发展新路。这是从实践反思、理论启迪和顺应国家优化国土开发格局战略新变化,破解中西部地区产业发展的“低端锁定”困局和重化工业结构与生态脆弱矛盾作出的必然选择。     

Responding to the New Europe and the Crisis: The Adaptation of Sub-national Governments' Strategies and its Effects on Inter-governmental Relations in Spain

This article analyses the evolution of the institutional setting that the Spanish multi-level system provides for regional European Union (EU) adaptation, and the effects that recent developments of the EU (the Eastern enlargement, the Treaty reform process and the Euro-zone crisis) have had on the more or less pro-European positions and adaptive strategies of Spanish regions and on inter-governmental arrangements. It thus describes the increasing institutionalization of regional participation and EU policy coordination, both at the domestic and supra-national level, and the evolution of regional strategies, looking at its effects both on the degree of vertical and horizontal coordination, and the actual relative power and discretion of both levels of government. It argues that regional strategies have increasingly become more defensive and less pro-European and that increasing participation in European matters seemed to have favoured multi-lateralism and increased coordination without having produced further centralization until the recent crisis and associated budget consolidation targets induced new coordination requirements and a centralization of power towards the central government and EU authorities. This has, as a side-effect, reinforced some centrifugal tendencies of the system and therefore may affect the operation of IGR.     

贵州民族地区推进新型工业化道路初探

党的"十六大"报告指出,我国要走一条新型工业化道路.贵州作为一个多民族省份,又是一个传统农业省,工农业基础薄弱,要改变经济落后的面貌,实现全面小康的宏伟目标,推进新型工业化势在必行,这是新的历史时期的重要任务.     

Reform Strategies Matter: Explaining the Perplexing Results of Regional Government Reforms in Norway and Denmark

Reforming the public sector often means imposing immediate costs on well-organised interests in return for longer-term, diffuse benefits to voters and taxpayers. Nonetheless, reforms sometimes are carried through. Investigations of this puzzle have followed two approaches: The first is structural and explains reforms as a consequence of the institutional setting in which policymakers operate. The second focuses on human agency. It investigates how reformers search for ways to overcome structural obstacles. This approach has lived a quiet life in recent decades. In this paper, we investigate recent attempts to reform the regional government level in Norway and Denmark. Despite very similar structural settings and political preferences, the reforms failed in Norway, but were successful in Denmark; failure and success being defined by the two governments' intensions. We argue that the explanation lies in the different reform strategies pursued by the central governments in the two countries.